| 干扰电疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效的对照研究 |
|
摘要点击次数: 2438
全文下载次数: 1393
投稿时间：2006-06-20
|
| 作者 | Author | 单位 | Address | E-Mail |
| 何杰民 |
HE Jiemin |
广州中山大学附属第二医院骨科,广东广州510120 |
The Second Affiliate Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,Guangdong,China |
hejiem in@orthopsumh.com |
| 许杰 |
XU Jie |
广州中山大学附属第二医院骨科,广东广州510120 |
The Second Affiliate Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,Guangdong,China |
|
| 唐勇 |
TANG Yong |
广州中山大学附属第二医院骨科,广东广州510120 |
The Second Affiliate Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,Guangdong,China |
|
| 杨睿 |
YANG Rui |
广州中山大学附属第二医院骨科,广东广州510120 |
The Second Affiliate Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,Guangdong,China |
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2006年，第19卷，第12期，第708-710页 |
| DOI：doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz |
| 基金项目: |
|
中文摘要:
目的:评价牵引加干扰电疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果,并与单纯牵引治疗相比较。
方法:对180例腰椎间盘突出症患者分为牵引加干扰电疗法治疗(B组)和单纯牵引治疗(A组)。A组89例,男45例,女44例,采用持续牵引,牵引力300～400N;B组91例,男46例,女45例,使用干扰电作疼痛区局部刺激。各病程分级(<2个月、2个月～2年、>2年),A组为29、30、30例,B组有31、30、30例;各年龄段(<40岁、40～55岁、>55岁)两组分别为30、29、30例及30、29、32例。对治疗前及治疗中期、治疗后分别以日本矫形外科学会制订的“腰椎疾患治疗成绩评分表”进行评分,对其评测结果进行比较分析。
结果:两组不同病程疗效结果比较,对于病程<2个月和2个月～2年的患者评分显示牵引加干扰电疗组较牵引组疗效好(P<0.01)。两组不同年龄段中,对于年龄<40岁和40～55岁的患者评分显示牵引组加干扰电疗组较牵引组疗效好(P<0.01)。
结论:对于病程<2年、年龄<55岁患者,牵引加干扰电疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症较单纯牵引治疗疗效佳。 |
| 【关键词】椎间盘移位 腰椎 理疗 |
| |
| Study on treatment of lumbar disc herniation with interferential electric current stimulation |
|
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of treatment of lumbar disc herniation with interferential electric current stimulation.
Methods:One hundred and eighty patients were divided into two groups.In control group,89 patients(45 male,44 female)were treated with traction;In experimental group 91 patients(46 male,45 female)were treated with interferential electric and traction.There were 29,30,30 patients in each historical degree(<2 months,2 months to 2 years,>2 years)in control group and there were 31,30,30 in treating group.There were 30,29,30 patients in each age stage(<40 years,40 to 55 years,>55 years)in control group and there were 30,29,32 patients in experimental group.The clinical results were measured by the Japanese lumbar treatment standard.
Results:After treating,the results of those in experimental group with history of <2 months and 2 months to 2 years were better than those in control group,the difference was significant(P<0.01).The results of those in experimental group in age stage of <40 years and 40 to 55 years were better than those in control group,the difference was significant(P<0.01).
Conclusion:Interferential electric current stimulation had significant advantages in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation for those who were younger than 55 years and the history shorter than 2 years. |
| KEY WORDS Intervertebral disk displacement Lumbar vertebrae Physical therapy |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 何杰民,许杰,唐勇,杨睿.干扰电疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效的对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(12):708~710 |
| 英文格式: | HE Jiemin,XU Jie,TANG Yong,YANG Rui.Study on treatment of lumbar disc herniation with interferential electric current stimulation[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2006,19(12):708~710 |
|
| 阅读全文 下载 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
