| 环锯法植骨术与传统切开植骨术治疗骨不连的疗效比较 |
|
摘要点击次数: 1827
全文下载次数: 1101
投稿时间：2004-04-15
|
| 作者 | Author | 单位 | Address | E-Mail |
| 周英杰 |
ZHOU Ying-jie |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
yangyang3554260@sina.com |
| 马虎升 |
MA Hu-sheng |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
|
| 石福明 |
SHI Fu-ming |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
|
| 赵庆安 |
ZHAO Qing-an |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
|
| 郭艳幸 |
GUO Yan-xing |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
|
| 史相钦 |
SHI Xiang-qin |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
|
| 李立新 |
LI Li-xin. |
洛阳正骨医院正骨研究所 河南洛阳471002 |
Luoyang Orthopedic Traumatological Hospital and Institute,Henan Luoyang,471002,China |
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2005年，第18卷，第3期，第140-141页 |
| DOI：doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz |
| 基金项目: |
|
中文摘要:
目的:比较小切口环锯法植骨术和传统切开植骨术治疗四肢陈旧性骨折骨不连疗效的优越性。
方法:110例四肢陈旧性骨折骨不连患者,按随机方法,实验组与对照组1∶2原则进行分组,实验组38例,对照组72例,实验组采用小切口环锯法植骨术,对照组采用传统切开植骨术,手术后观察和比较两组骨不连患者骨折愈合所需时间。
结果:实验组骨折愈合时间(5.50±2.37)个月,对照组骨折愈合时间(9.00±5.32)个月;实验组和对照组采用成组t检验,P<0.05,差异有显著性意义,说明实验组比对照组骨折愈合时间短。
结论:小切口环锯法植骨术比传统的切开植骨术疗效好。 |
| 【关键词】骨移植 骨折,不愈合 四肢 |
| |
| Comparative study of therapeutic effect between trepan-method for bone grafting and traditional incision bone grafting for the treatment of nonunion |
|
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the advantages of trepan-method for bone grafting(TMBG)through a small incision and traditional incision bone grafting(TIBG)in the therapeutic effect on nonunion of old fracture in extremities.
Methods:According to random method,one hundred and ten patients of nonunion of old fracture in extremities were taken as the experimental group and the control group.Thiry-eight patients of the experimental group were treated by TMBG through a small incision,the seventy-two patients of the control group were treated by TIBG,the fracture healing time of the two groups were observed and compared postoperatively.
Results:The fracture-healing time of the experimented and the control groups were(5.50±2.37)and(9.00±5.32)months,respectively.Through the grouping t -test,the difference of these two groups was significant( P <0.05),suggesting that the experimental group had shorter fracture-healing time than that of the control.
Conclusion:The therapeutic effect of TMBG through a small incision is better than that of TIBG. |
| KEY WORDS Bone transplantation Fractures,ununited Extremities |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 周英杰,马虎升,石福明,赵庆安,郭艳幸,史相钦,李立新.环锯法植骨术与传统切开植骨术治疗骨不连的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2005,18(3):140~141 |
| 英文格式: | ZHOU Ying-jie,MA Hu-sheng,SHI Fu-ming,ZHAO Qing-an,GUO Yan-xing,SHI Xiang-qin,LI Li-xin..Comparative study of therapeutic effect between trepan-method for bone grafting and traditional incision bone grafting for the treatment of nonunion[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2005,18(3):140~141 |
|
| 阅读全文 下载 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
