| AI-HIP系统在全髋关节置换中的假体型号及联合偏心距和截骨的作用研究 |
|
Hits: 94
Download times: 42
Received:June 26, 2024
|
| 作者 | Author | 单位 | Unit | E-Mail |
| 孙国源 |
SUN Guo-yuan |
中国医学科学院北京协和医学院研究生院, 北京 100730 |
Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China |
|
| 蒋言坤 |
JIANG Yan-kun |
北京大学中日友好临床医学院, 北京 100029 |
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China |
|
| 李彤 |
LI Tong |
中日友好医院骨科, 北京 100029 |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China |
|
| 丛雪峰 |
CONG Xue-feng |
德州市第七人民医院骨科, 山东 德州 253000 |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dezhou Seventh People's Hospital, Dezhou 253000, Shandong, China |
|
| 黄诚 |
HUANG Cheng |
中日友好医院骨科, 北京 100029 |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China |
|
| 丁冉 |
DING Ran |
中日友好医院骨科, 北京 100029 |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China |
|
| 王卫国 |
WANG Wei-guo |
中日友好医院骨科, 北京 100029 |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China |
|
| 张启栋 |
ZHANG Qi-dong |
中日友好医院骨科, 北京 100029 |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China |
zhangqidong1982@sina.com |
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2024年37卷，第9期，第848-854页 |
| DOI：10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240276 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:82072494,81972130);中央高水平医院临床科研业务费(编号:2022-NHLHCRF-YGJE-05);中日友好医院"菁英计划"人才培育工程(编号:ZRJY2021-GG08);首都卫生发展科研专项(编号:2020-2-4067) |
|
目的: 探讨AI-HIP辅助手术规划系统在初次单侧全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)中的规划效果及其临床结果。
方法: 回顾性分析2022年3月至2022年11月连续性应用AI-HIP系统行初次单侧THA的36例患者的临床资料,男16例,女20例,年龄43~81(62.2±10.9)岁,将其纳入AI-HIP组;根据配对原则选择同期采用传统模板方法规划的患者36例,男16例,女20例,年龄40~80(60.9±12.1)岁,作为对照组。比较两组假体的准确率,以及术前规划和术后实际联合偏心距差值、下肢长度差值、距小转子上缘截骨高度和顶肩距以评价规划效果,采用Harris评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价其临床疗效。
结果: 两组均获得随访,时间12~18(14.5±2.1)个月。AI-HIP组规划髋臼杯和股骨柄假体型号的完全准确率、近似准确率分别为72.2%、100%和58.3%、88.9%,均优于对照组的44.4%、83.3%和33.3%、66.7%(P＜0.05); 规划股骨头假体型号差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。AI-HIP组术后实际联合偏心距差值、联合偏心距差值(实际-规划)分别为1.0(0.2,2.4) mm、1.1(-2.1,3.2) mm,优于对照组的3.0(1.4,4.9) mm、3.5(-1.6,6.5) mm(P＜0.05)。两组间术后实际距小转子上缘截骨高度比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。AI-HIP组术后实际下肢长度差值、下肢长度差值(实际-规划)、距小转子上缘截骨高度(实际-规划)、术后实际顶肩距、顶肩距差值(实际-规划)分别为1.5(0.2,2.8)、1.1(-0.3,2.2)、2.1(-2.3,4.1)、(15.3±4.1)、-2.2(-4.8,0.3) mm,优于对照组的2.6(1.3,4.1)、2.5(0.3,3.8)、5.8(-2.4,7.7)、(13.0±4.3)、-5.7(-9.4,-2.2) mm(P＜0.05)。末次随访,两组Harris评分中功能、疼痛、功能、畸形、总分及VAS比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);而AI-HIP组Harris评分中活动度评分(4.8±0.6)分,高于对照组(4.4±0.8)分(P＜0.05)。
结论: AI-HIP辅助手术规划系统较传统模板规划,在初次单侧THA中对髋臼杯和股骨柄假体型号的预测、恢复联合偏心距、规划下肢长度、截骨高度和顶肩距方面具有良好的准确性,临床效果满意。 |
| [关键词]:全髋关节置换术 术前规划 人工智能 |
| |
| AI-HIP system for prosthesis size,global femoral offset and osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty |
|
Abstract:
Objective To explore planning effect of AI-HIP assisted surgical planning system in primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its influence on clinical outcomes.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 36 patients who underwent their first unilateral THA from March 2022 to November 2022 and continuously used AI-HIP system (AI-HIP group),including 16 males and 20 females,aged from 43 to 81 years old with an average of (62.2±10.9) years old. According to the matching principle,36 patients who were planned by the traditional template method at the same period were selected as the control group,including 16 males and 20 females,aged from 40 to 80 years old with an average of (60.9±12.1) years old. The accuracy between two groups of prostheses were compared,as well as the combined eccentricity difference between preoperative planning and postoperative practice,lower limb length difference,osteotomy height from the upper edge of the lesser trochanter and top shoulder distance to evaluate planning effect. Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical efficacy.
Results Both groups were followed up for 12 to 18 months with an average of (14.5±2.1) months. The complete accuracy and approximate accuracy of acetabular cup and femoral stalk prosthesis in AI-HIP group were 72.2%,100%,58.3%,88.9%,respectively,which were better than 44.4%,83.3%,33.3%,66.7% in control group (P＜0.05). There was no statistical significance in planning of femoral head prosthesis size (P＞0.05). The actual combined eccentricity difference and combined eccentricity difference (practical-planning) in AI-HIP group were 1.0(0.2,2.4) mm and 1.1(-2.1,3.2) mm,respectively;which were better than 3.0 (1.4,4.9) mm and 3.5 (-1.6,6.5) mm in control group (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in actual osteotomy height of the upper margin of the lesser trochanter (P＞0.05). In AI-HIP group,the actual difference of lower extremity length after surgery,the difference of lower extremity length (practical-planning),osteotomy height from the upper margin of lesser trochanter (practical-planning),actual topshoulder distance after surgery,and topshoulder distance (practical-planning) were 1.5 (0.2,2.8),1.1 (-0.3,2.2),2.1(-2.3,4.1),(15.3±4.1),2.2(-4.8,0.3) mm,respectively;which were better than control group of 2.6(1.3,4.1),2.5 (0.3,3.8),5.8(-2.4,7.7),(13.0±4.3),-5.7(-9.4,-2.2) mm(P＜0.05). At final follow-up,there were no significant differences in Harris scores of pain,function,deformity,total scores and VAS between two groups (P＞0.05). The range of motion score was 4.8±0.6 in AI-HIP group,which was higher than that in control group (4.4±0.8)(P＜0.05).
Conclusion Compared with traditional template planning,AI-HIP assisted surgical planning system has good accuracy in predicting the prosthetic size of the acetabular cup and femoral stalk,restoring joint eccentricity,planning lower limb length,osteotomy height and top shoulder distance on the first unilateral THA,and the clinical follow-up effect is satisfactory. |
| KEYWORDS:Total hip arthroplasty Preoperative planning Artificial intelligence |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 孙国源,蒋言坤,李彤,丛雪峰,黄诚,丁冉,王卫国,张启栋.AI-HIP系统在全髋关节置换中的假体型号及联合偏心距和截骨的作用研究[J].中国骨伤,2024,37(9):848~854 |
| 英文格式: | SUN Guo-yuan,JIANG Yan-kun,LI Tong,CONG Xue-feng,HUANG Cheng,DING Ran,WANG Wei-guo,ZHANG Qi-dong.AI-HIP system for prosthesis size,global femoral offset and osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2024,37(9):848~854 |
|
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
