Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
大转子后半截骨入路与标准Kocher-Langenbeck入路治疗髋臼后壁骨折的疗效比较
Hits: 562   Download times: 214   Received:July 26, 2023    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张津 ZHANG Jin 甘肃省中医院创伤骨二科, 甘肃 兰州 730050 Second Trauma Department of Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China  
申建军 SHEN Jian-jun 甘肃省中医院创伤骨二科, 甘肃 兰州 730050 Second Trauma Department of Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China  
海祥 HAI Xiang 甘肃中医药大学, 甘肃 兰州 730030 Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China  
刘川源 LIU Chuan-yuan 甘肃中医药大学, 甘肃 兰州 730030 Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China  
周文杰 ZHOU Wen-jie 甘肃省中医院创伤骨二科, 甘肃 兰州 730050 Second Trauma Department of Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China  
陈志伟 CHEN Zhi-wei 甘肃省中医院创伤骨二科, 甘肃 兰州 730050 Second Trauma Department of Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China 13519698516@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2024年37卷,第8期,第786-792页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20221109
基金项目:甘肃省卫生健康行业科研计划项目(编号:GSWSKY2021-035)


目的:比较大转子后半截骨入路与标准Kocher-Langenbeck(K-L)入路治疗髋臼后壁骨折的临床疗效,探讨治疗髋臼后壁骨折的更优入路。

方法:回顾性分析自2019年1月至2021年6月收治的47例髋臼后壁骨折患者,根据手术方法分为大转子后半截骨组(试验组)及标准K-L入路组(对照组)。试验组24例,男16例,女8例,年龄(42.00±4.52)岁,受伤至手术时间(6.75±1.15) d。对照组23例,男16例,女7例,年龄(41.00±5.82)岁;受伤至手术时间(7.09±1.20) d。观察比较两组患者住院总时间、手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、骨折复位质量(Matta标准)、髋关节外展肌力、髋关节功能(Merle d'Aubigne-Postel评分)、术后两组并发症及异位骨化发生率。

结果:所有患者获得6个月随访,两组手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但试验组手术时间较对照组更短(P<0.05)。两组术后6个月骨折复位质量、髋关节功能评价差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组髋关节外展肌力优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率、异位骨化发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论:相比于标准K-L入路法,大转子后半截骨入路可缩短手术时间,对术后髋关节外展肌力恢复更好,术中对涉及髋臼后壁较为粉碎的骨折或臼顶骨折暴露视野更加,提高骨折解剖复位率,为临床治疗髋臼后壁骨折提供新的思路令另患者可早期行功能锻炼。
[关键词]:大转子后半截骨  Kocher-Langenbeck入路  髋臼后壁骨折  围术期指标  髋关节功能
 
Comparison of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures
Abstract:

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langenbeck(K-L) approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures and to explore a more optimal approach for the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures.

Methods Total of 26 patients with posterior acetabulum wall fractures were retrospectively analysed and divided into two groups:the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter group (test group) and the standard K-L approach group (control group). In the test group,there were 24 patients including 16 males and 8 females with an average age of (42.00±4.52) years old,the time of injury to surgery was (6.75±1.15) d. In the control group,there were 23 patients including 16 males and 7 females with an average age of (41.00±5.82) years old,the time of injury to surgery was (7.09±1.20) days. The total hospital stay,length of incision,operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative drainage,discharge,fracture reduction quality (Matta criteria),hip abduction muscle strength,hip function (Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score),postoperative complications and the incidence of ectopic ossification were compared.

Results All cases were followed up for 6 months. There was no significant difference in incision length,intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage between two groups(P>0.05). However,the operation time of the test group was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in fracture reduction and hip function between two groups (P>0.05). The hip abduction muscle strength of test group was better than that of control group(P<0.05). In addition,there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and heterotopic ossification between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion Compared with the standard K-L approach,the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach can shorten the operative time,has better recovery of the postoperative hip abduction muscle strength,exposes the view of the fracture involving the more comminuted posterior acetabulum wall or the fracture of the roof of the socket,improved the rate of fracture anatomical repositioning,provides a new idea for the clinical treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures,and allows patients to perform functional exercises at an early stage. Kocher-Langenbeck approach; Posterior acetabulum wall fractures; Perimeter indicators; Hip function
KEYWORDS:Posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter  Kocher-Langenbeck approach  Posterior acetabulum wall fractures  Perimeter indicators  Hip function
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张津,申建军,海祥,刘川源,周文杰,陈志伟.大转子后半截骨入路与标准Kocher-Langenbeck入路治疗髋臼后壁骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2024,37(8):786~792
英文格式:ZHANG Jin,SHEN Jian-jun,HAI Xiang,LIU Chuan-yuan,ZHOU Wen-jie,CHEN Zhi-wei.Comparison of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2024,37(8):786~792
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com