Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
改良Uhl闭合穿针技术治疗Colles骨折回顾性研究
Hits: 962   Download times: 384   Received:July 08, 2023    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
李朝辉 LI Zhao-hui 山东省文登整骨医院创伤整复科, 山东 威海 264400 Department of Trauma Rehabilitation, Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital of Shandong, Weihai 264400, Shandong, China  
孙忠义 SUN Zhong-yi 山东省文登整骨医院创伤整复科, 山东 威海 264400 Department of Trauma Rehabilitation, Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital of Shandong, Weihai 264400, Shandong, China  
聂真 NIE Zhen 北京理工大学, 北京 100081 Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China  
陈煜 CHEN Yu 北京理工大学, 北京 100081 Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China  
聂伟志 NIE Wei-zhi 山东省文登整骨医院创伤整复科, 山东 威海 264400 Department of Trauma Rehabilitation, Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital of Shandong, Weihai 264400, Shandong, China 18663103927@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2023年36卷,第9期,第821-826页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.09.006


目的:回顾性分析中国接骨学(Chinese osteosynthesis,CO)理念指导下改良Uhl技术治疗Colles骨折的优势。

方法:回顾性研究2016年 1 月至 2021年 6月采用改良Uhl闭合穿针技术治疗Colles骨折358例,符合条件的纳入120例,按照手术方法不同分为两组:闭合穿针组和切开复位组。闭合穿针组68例,采用CO接骨理念指导下改良Uhl闭合复位经皮穿针技术;切开复位组52例,采用切开复位钢板内固定技术。术后 6 个月比较两组腕关节改良的Sarmiento影像学评分、Gartland-Werley腕关节评分及手术时间、住院时间、治疗费用。

结果:两组患者均获得6个月以上随访。两组在Sarmiento影像学评分、Gartland-Werley腕关节评分方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。闭合穿针组手术时间(35.88±14.11) min、住院时间(9.78±2.48) d、治疗费用(16 074.91±1 964.48)元,与切开复位组手术时间(65.48±14.26) min、住院时间(15.88±2.00) d、治疗费用(20 451.27±1 760.22)元相比,差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05),闭合穿针组优于切开复位组。

结论:与切开复位钢板内固定相比,改良Uhl闭合复位经皮穿针技术治疗Colles骨折具有固定可靠、创伤小、手术快、痛苦小、住院时间短、治疗费用低等优点,是一种值得推广的优势技术。缺点是钢针滑移易损伤肌腱,针对合并粉碎骨块且有骨质疏松的Colles骨折,可能无法牢固固定,需结合其他技术。
[关键词]:中国接骨学  Colles骨折  闭合穿针  改良Uhl技术
 
Retrospective study on the modified Uhl technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pin in the treatment of Colles' fracture
Abstract:

Objective To retrospectively assess the advantages of the modified Uhl technique in the treatment of Colles' fracture guided by the principles of Chinese osteosynthesis (CO) concept.

Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 358 patients with Colles' fracture treated with the modified Uhl technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pin between January 2016 and June 2021. Out of these,120 eligible cases were selected and categorized into two groups according to different surgical methods:the closed reduction and percutaneous pin group,and the open reduction group. Sixty-eight patients in the closed reduction and percutaneous pin group were treated with the modified Uhl technique,while fifty-two patients in the open reduction group were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using plates. The modified Sarmiento imaging score,Gartland-Werley wrist score,operation time,hospital stay,and treatment costs between the two groups were compared at a 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Results There were no significant differences in terms of gender,age,affected side,injure factors,time of injury to surgery,Sarmiento imaging score,and Gartland-Werley wrist joint score (P>0.05). The closed reduction and percutaneous pin group exhibited an operation time of (35.88±14.11) minutes,hospitalization stay of (9.78±2.48) days,and treatment costs of (16 074.91±1 964.48) yuan,while the open reduction group demonstrated comparatively longer operation time of (65.48±14.26) minutes,hospitalization stay of (15.88±2.00) days,and treatment costs of (20 451.27±1 760.22) yuan (P<0.01).

Conclusion The modified Uhl technique presents notable advantages in the management of Colles' fracture,including reliable fixation,less trauma,shorter operation time,less pain,shorter hospital stay,and cost-effectiveness. This technique exhibits promising potential for broader clinical application. However,it is important to note that the pin could potentially damage tendons,and in cases of Colles' fractures with osteoporosis and comminuted fragments,additional techniques may be required for reliable fixation.
KEYWORDS:Chinese osteopathology  Colles fracture  Closed needle  Modified Uhl technique
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:李朝辉,孙忠义,聂真,陈煜,聂伟志.改良Uhl闭合穿针技术治疗Colles骨折回顾性研究[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(9):821~826
英文格式:LI Zhao-hui,SUN Zhong-yi,NIE Zhen,CHEN Yu,NIE Wei-zhi.Retrospective study on the modified Uhl technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pin in the treatment of Colles' fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2023,36(9):821~826
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com