Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折骨缺损不同内固定方案的生物力学分析
Hits: 2652   Download times: 669   Received:October 19, 2022    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
苏志豪 SU Zhi-hao 上海理工大学健康科学与工程学院, 上海 200093
上海市浦东新区人民医院骨科, 上海 201299
School of Health Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201299, China
 
谭宏莉 TAN Hong-li 海安市中医院康复科, 江苏 海安 226600 Department of Rehabilitation, Haian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Jiangsu Province, Haian 226600, Jiangsu, China  
徐子环 XU Zi-huan 上海理工大学健康科学与工程学院, 上海 200093
上海市浦东新区人民医院骨科, 上海 201299
School of Health Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201299, China
 
李鹏飞 LI Peng-fei 上海理工大学健康科学与工程学院, 上海 200093
上海市浦东新区人民医院骨科, 上海 201299
School of Health Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201299, China
 
王永钦 WANG Yong-qin 上海理工大学健康科学与工程学院, 上海 200093
上海市浦东新区人民医院骨科, 上海 201299
School of Health Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201299, China
 
李双 LI Shuang 上海市浦东新区人民医院骨科, 上海 201299 Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201299, China  
倪明 NI Ming 上海市浦东新区人民医院骨科, 上海 201299
上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科, 上海 200025
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201299, China
Department of Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
gendianqing@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2023年36卷,第3期,第255-261页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.03.012
基金项目:上海市浦东新区新兴交叉学科-数字骨科项目(编号:PWXx2020-08);上海市科委港澳合作项目(编号:21410760200)


目的:探究不同内固定治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折骨缺损的生物力学特征,为骨折治疗提供参考。

方法:基于CT图像建立Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折模型,包括单纯骨折和骨折骨缺损两种特征,模拟4种内固定,即倒置空心螺钉(inverted cannulated screw,ICS)、ICS+内侧板、股骨颈系统(femoral neck system,FNS)和FNS+内侧板。测量并比较不同骨折模型在2100 N轴向载荷下的应力分布、模型刚度和位移情况。

结果:ICS和FNS固定时,峰值应力集中于螺钉与骨折端接触位置,FNS的峰值应力高于ICS;与内侧板联用后,峰值应力转移至内侧板,且应力增大,ICS的增加幅度大于FNS。在骨折类型相同的情况下,FNS固定的刚度高于ICS。与骨缺损模型相比,骨折模型在相同内固定时刚度更高。内侧支撑板的使用可增加模型的刚度,但ICS模型的增加幅度超过FNS模型。ICS固定模型的骨折端位移超过FNS模型。

结论:对于Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折骨缺损模型,FNS较ICS具有更好的生物力学性能。ICS+内侧板有助于增强治疗的稳定性,但建议采用非锁定板;FNS具有抗剪切功能,无须与内侧板联用。
[关键词]:股骨颈骨折  骨缺损  有限元分析  内侧板  股骨颈系统
 
Biomechanical analysis of four internal fixations for Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures with defects
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the biomechanical characteristics of different internal fixations for Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture with defect,and provide reference for the treatment of femoral neck fracture.

Methods Three■dimensional (3D) finite element models of femoral neck fractures were established based on CT images,including fracture and fracture with defects. Four internal fixations were simulated,namely,inverted cannulated screw(ICS),ICS combined with medial buttress plate,the femoral neck system (FNS) and FNS combined with medial buttress plate. The von Mises stress,model stiffness and fracture displacements of fracture models under 2 100 N axial loads were measured and compared.

Results When femoral neck fracture was fixed by ICS and FNS,the peak stress was mainly concentrated on the surface of the screw near the fracture line,and the peak stress of FNS is higher than that of ICS;When the medial buttress plate was combined,the peak stress was increased and transferred to medial buttress plate,with more obvious of ICS fixation. For the same fracture model,the stiffness of FNS was higher than that of ICS. Compared with femoral neck fracture with defects,fracture model showed higher stiffness in the same internal fixation. The use of medial buttress plate increased model stiffness,but ICS increased more than FNS. The fracture displacement of ICS model exceeded that of FNS.

Conclusion For Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture with defects,FNS had better biomechanical properties than ICS. ICS combined with medial buttress plate can better enhance fixation stability and non■locking plate is recommended. FNS had the capability of shear resistance and needn't combine with medial buttress plate.
KEYWORDS:Femoral neck fracture  Bone defect  Finite element analysis  Medial buttress plate  Femoral neck system
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:苏志豪,谭宏莉,徐子环,李鹏飞,王永钦,李双,倪明.Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折骨缺损不同内固定方案的生物力学分析[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(3):255~261
英文格式:SU Zhi-hao,TAN Hong-li,XU Zi-huan,LI Peng-fei,WANG Yong-qin,LI Shuang,NI Ming.Biomechanical analysis of four internal fixations for Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures with defects[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2023,36(3):255~261
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com