Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
中年人移位型股骨颈骨折内固定与关节置换的疗效比较
Hits: 1842   Download times: 776   Received:January 08, 2023    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
王志远 WANG Zhi-yuan 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
罗璠 LUO Fan 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
张英琪 ZHANG Ying-qi 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
刘嘉 LIU Jia 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
祝晓忠 ZHU Xiao-zhong 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
饶志涛 RAO Zhi-tao 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China raozht1980@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2023年36卷,第3期,第232-235页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.03.007


目的:分析比较年龄55~65岁中年人股骨颈移位型骨折内固定与关节置换的临床疗效。

方法:2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 8 月收治 Garden Ⅲ型或Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折患者 86例,根据手术方式的不同将其分为两组。其中38例采用平行拉力螺钉内固定治疗(内固定组),男 26 例,女12例,年龄55~64(60.2±3.1)岁;48例进行全髋关节置换术(关节置换组),男28 例,女20例,年龄57~65(61.3±3.8)岁。受伤至手术时间 1~3 d。比较两组患者的再手术率,深部感染发生率,髋关节功能Harris评分,疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),患者主观报告功能评分采用欧洲五维健康量表(European five-dimensional Health Questionnaire,EQ-5D)。

结果:所有患者获得随访,时间 24~54(35.8±10.3)个月。平行拉力螺钉内固定组术后再手术率高于较全髋关节置换术组(P<0.05)。两组患者深部感染发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后12个月时髋关节Harris评分及VAS比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。平行拉力螺钉内固定组术后患者主观报告的功能评分EQ-5D低于全髋关节置换术组(P<0.05)。

结论:中年人股骨颈移位型骨折内固定与关节置换的中短期疗效相似,但全髋关节置换术后再手术率低,患者主观报告的功能评分较高。
[关键词]:股骨颈骨折  内固定  全髋关节置换术
 
Comparison of effect between internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in middle age patients
Abstract:

Objective To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture from 55 to 65 years.

Methods From September 2016 to August 2020,86 patients with Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ femoral neck fracture were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods. Among them,38 patients were treated with lag screws for internal fixation,there were 26 males and 12 females,aged 55 to 64 years old with an average of(60.2±3.1) years;the other 48 patients were treated with total hip replacement,including 28 males and 20 females,aged from 57 to 65 years old with an average of(61.3±3.8) years. The time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 3 days. The reoperation rate,incidence of deep infection,Harris score of hip joint function,visual analogue scale(VAS) of pain and patients reported outcome scores(European five-dimensional Health Questionnaire,EQ-5D) were compared between two groups.

Results All patients were followed up for 24 to 54 months with an average of (35.8±10.3) months. There was significant difference in reoperation rate between two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on the incidence of deep infection,hip Harris score and VAS between two groups(P>0.05). The postoperative EQ-5D score of patients with internal fixation was lower than that of total hip replacement,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusion Both the surgery of internal fixation and total hip replacement have similar effect in short-and medium term among the patients aged 55 to 65 years old. However,for the reoperation rate,the group of internal fixation was higher than that of total hip replacement. For the subjective functional score of patients,the group of internal fixation was lower than that of total hip replacement.
KEYWORDS:Femoral neck fracture  Internal fixation  Total hip replacement
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王志远,罗璠,张英琪,刘嘉,祝晓忠,饶志涛.中年人移位型股骨颈骨折内固定与关节置换的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(3):232~235
英文格式:WANG Zhi-yuan,LUO Fan,ZHANG Ying-qi,LIU Jia,ZHU Xiao-zhong,RAO Zhi-tao.Comparison of effect between internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in middle age patients[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2023,36(3):232~235
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com