Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
不同穿刺方法注入骨水泥在骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折中的应用研究
Hits: 1220   Download times: 484   Received:March 14, 2022    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
何毅 HE Yi 南部县人民医院骨科, 四川 南部 637300 Department of Orthopaedics, Nanbu County People's Hospital, Nanbu 637300, Sichuan, China  
白亦光 BAI Yi-guang 南充市中心医院骨科, 四川 南充 637000 Department of Orthopaedics, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanshong 637000, Sichuan, China bb81374@21cn.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2023年36卷,第1期,第86-91页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.01.016
基金项目:四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(编号:16PJ202)


目的:研究不同穿刺方法注入骨水泥在骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折(osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures,OVCFs)的临床应用。

方法:对2017年1月至2019年12月收治的282例OVCFs患者进行回顾性研究,根据手术方案分为A、B两组,每组141例。A组采取极外侧穿刺法经单侧穿刺、双侧注入骨水泥,B组采取椎弓根入路单侧穿刺注入骨水泥。观察两组手术情况(手术时间、射线暴露时间、骨水泥注入量、住院时间)和并发症,比较术前和术后6、12个月疼痛介质,包括5羟色胺(5-hydroxytryptamine,5-HT)、前列腺素E2(prostaglandin E2,PGE2)、P物质(substance P,SP),以及骨密度水平、伤椎解剖参数(椎体前缘高度、椎体后缘高度、Cobb角)、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。

结果:两组手术时间、射线暴露时间、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组骨水泥注入量大于B组(P<0.05)。术后12个月A组血清5-HT、SP、PGE2水平低于B组(P<0.05);术后12个月A组椎体前缘高度、椎体后缘高度大于B组,Cobb角小于B组,VAS、ODI低于B组(P<0.05);术后6、12个月两组骨密度比较差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后并发症两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论:与椎弓根入路单侧穿刺法比较,极外侧穿刺法经单侧穿刺、双侧注入骨水泥技术更有利于伤椎解剖结构和功能恢复,且不延长手术时间、射线暴露时间、住院时间,也不增加神经损伤、骨水泥渗漏风险,术后骨代谢及骨密度改善良好,是治疗OVCFs的安全可靠术式。
[关键词]:骨质疏松性骨折  脊柱骨折  椎体成形术
 
Application of different puncture techniques to inject bone cement in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Abstract:

Objective To study the application of different puncture techniques to inject bone cement in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Methods The clinical data of 282 patients with OVCFs treated from January 2017 to December 2019 were collected for a retrospective study. According to the surgical plan the patients were divided into group A and B,with 141 cases in each group. In group A,extreme lateral puncture was used to inject bone cement through unilateral puncture and bilateral puncture. In group B,bone cement was injected through unilateral pedicle puncture through pedicle approach. The operation status(operation time,radiation exposure time,bone cement injection volume,hospital stay) and complications were observed between two groups. Before operation and 6,12 months after operation,the pain mediators such as serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT),prostaglandin E2(PGE2),substance P(SP) were compared,bone mineral density,anatomical parameters of the injured vertebrae (height of the anterior edge of the vertebral body,height of the posterior edge of the vertebral body,Cobb angle),visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated between two groups.

Results There were no significant difference in operation time,radiation exposure time,hospital stay between two groups (P>0.05). The amount of bone cement injected in group A was greater than that in group B (P<0.05). The serum 5-HT,SP and PGE2 levels of group A were lower than those of group B at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The height of anterior edge and height of the posterior edge of vertebral body in group A were greater than those of group B at 12 months after operation,Cobb angle of group A was smaller than that of group B,VAS and ODI were lower than those of group B(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in bone mineral density between two groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in postoperative complications (P>0.05).

Conclusion Compared with unilateral puncture of the pedicle approach,unilateral puncture and bilateral cement injection technique is more conducive to the recovery of the injured vertebral anatomy and function,and do not prolong operation time,radiation exposure time,hospital stay,nor do increase the risk of nerve damage and bone cement leakage,and postoperative bone metabolism and bone mineral density are improved well,which is a safe and reliable surgical method for the treatment of OVCFs.
KEYWORDS:Osteoporotic fractures  Spinal fractures  Vertebroplasty
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:何毅,白亦光.不同穿刺方法注入骨水泥在骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折中的应用研究[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(1):86~91
英文格式:HE Yi,BAI Yi-guang.Application of different puncture techniques to inject bone cement in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2023,36(1):86~91
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com