Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
仰卧位常规器械OCM入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的疗效对照
Hits: 2329   Download times: 607   Received:March 21, 2021    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
刘秋明 LIU Qiu-ming 台州市中心医院 台州学院附属医院, 浙江 台州 318000 Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China 234869779@qq.com 
夏宁晓 XIA Ning-xiao 台州市中心医院 台州学院附属医院, 浙江 台州 318000 Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China  
李小亚 LI Xiao-ya 台州市中心医院 台州学院附属医院, 浙江 台州 318000 Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China  
冯明宣 FENG Ming-xuan 台州市中心医院 台州学院附属医院, 浙江 台州 318000 Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China  
滕晓 TENG Xiao 台州市中心医院 台州学院附属医院, 浙江 台州 318000 Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2021年34卷,第10期,第934-940页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.10.010


目的:比较仰卧位常规器械OCM入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的临床疗效。

方法:2017年2月至2019年1月因髋关节疾病行髋关节置换患者67例,其中微创组21例采用OCM入路,男12例,女9例;股骨颈骨折10例,股骨头无菌性坏死5例,髋关节骨性关节炎6例。传统组46例采用传统后外侧入路,男28例,女18例;股骨颈骨折24例,股骨头无菌性坏死12例,髋关节骨性关节炎10例。所有患者使用生物型陶-陶人工关节假体。观察比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、手术前后肌酸激酶(CK-NAC)、下地活动时间、住院时间、术后假体的外展角及前倾角。比较两组术前及术后12个月Harris评分。

结果:所有病例获得随访,时间14~26(18.4±3.6)个月。两组患者术中出血、术后前倾角及外展角比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组病例手术时间、切口长度、术后肌酸激酶、下地时间、住院时间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前及术后12个月Harris功能评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论:两种入路人工全髋关节置换术均可获得满意的疗效,OCM入路损伤小,术后康复快,是可靠的手术入路。
[关键词]:微创外科手术  康复  关节成形术,置换,髋
 
Comparison of total hip arthroplasty with conventional instrument OCM approach and posterolateral approach in supine position
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty with conventional instrument OCM approach and posterolateral approach in supine position.

Methods: From February 2017 to January 2019,67 patients underwent hip arthroplasty due to hip diseases,including 21 patients in the minimally invasive group,12 males and 9 females;there were 10 cases of femoral neck fracture,5 cases of aseptic necrosis of femoral head and 6 cases of hip osteoarthritis. In the traditional group,46 cases were treated by traditional posterolateral approach,including 28 males and 18 females;there were 24 cases of femoral neck fracture,12 cases of aseptic necrosis of femoral head and 10 cases of hip osteoarthritis. All patients used biological ceramic artificial joint prosthesis. The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,incision length,preoperative and postoperative creatine kinase(CK-NAC),underground activity time,hospital stay,abduction angle and anteversion angle of prosthesis were observed and compared between two groups. Harris scores before operation and 12 months after operation were compared between two groups.

Results: All cases were followed up for 14 to 26(18.4±3.6) months. There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding,postoperative anteversion and abduction angle between two groups (P>0.05). There were significant differences in operation time,incision length,postoperative creatine kinase,underground time and hospital stay between two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris function score between two groups before operation and 12 months after operation(P>0.05).

Conclusion: The two approaches of total hip arthroplasty can obtain satisfactory results. OCM approach has less damage and rapid postoperative recovery. It is a reliable surgical approach and can be popularized and used.
KEYWORDS:Minimal surgical procedures  Rehabilitation  Arthroplasty,replacement,hip
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:刘秋明,夏宁晓,李小亚,冯明宣,滕晓.仰卧位常规器械OCM入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的疗效对照[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(10):934~940
英文格式:LIU Qiu-ming,XIA Ning-xiao,LI Xiao-ya,FENG Ming-xuan,TENG Xiao.Comparison of total hip arthroplasty with conventional instrument OCM approach and posterolateral approach in supine position[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2021,34(10):934~940
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com