Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
采用不同缝线及缝合位点缝合内侧半月板后根部损伤的生物力学研究
Hits: 2310   Download times: 0   Received:February 12, 2020    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
王江涛 WANG Jiang-tao 白求恩国际和平医院骨二科, 河北 石家庄 050000  
步建立 BU Jian-li 白求恩国际和平医院骨二科, 河北 石家庄 050000  
申学振 SHEN Xue-zhen 中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100853
南开大学医学院, 天津 300071
Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China  
常晗 CHANG Han 中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100853 Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China  
滕立佳 TENG Li-jia 中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100853 Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China  
朱娟丽 ZHU Juan-li 中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100853 Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China  
刘洋 LIU Yang 中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100853 Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China  
刘玉杰 LIU Yu-jie 中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100853 Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China liuyujie301@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2021年34卷,第5期,第442-447页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.05.009


目的: 比较不同高强度缝线及不同缝合位点缝合固定内侧半月板后根部损伤的生物力学特性。

方法: 取新鲜猪(雌性,月龄5~9个月,平均7个月)膝关节内侧半月板标本48个,采用Mason-Allen缝合方法建立实验模型。根据缝合位点不同随机分为红区固定组、红-白区固定组,每组24例。再根据固定材料不同将每组随机分为3个亚组,每组8例,分别采用Ethibond缝线、Ultrabraid缝线、FiberWire缝线固定。采用万能电磁力学试验机,先给予1 000次的循环载荷后行拔出试验,直至拔出失败;测量并计算标本最大失败载荷、失效载荷、拔出刚度及循环位移。

结果: 所有标本顺利完成生物力学测试。Ethibond缝线组失败模式均为缝线断裂。Ultrabraid缝线组失败模式:6例为缝线断裂,均属红区固定组;10例为缝线拔出,其中2例属红区固定组,8例属红-白区固定组。FiberWire缝线组失败模式均为缝线拔出。生物力学结果:(1)在缝线强度比较方面,最大失败载荷、失效载荷及拔出刚度:Ethibond缝线组P<0.05);100、500、1 000次循环位移:Ethibond缝线组>Ultrabraid缝线组>FiberWire缝线组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);表明FiberWire缝线强度最优,Ultrabraid缝线次之,Ethibond缝线最差。(2)在缝合位点比较方面,最大失败载荷、失效载荷及拔出刚度:红区固定组>红-白区固定组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);100、500、1 000次循环位移:红区固定组<红-白区固定组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),表明红区缝合强度优于红-白区缝合。

结论: Mason-Allen缝合方法可有效固定内侧半月板后根部损伤并满足术后早期部分负重要求。术中采用FiberWire缝线并将缝合位点置于红区可获得更好的固定效果,有利于半月板愈合及功能恢复。
[关键词]:缝线  胫骨半月板损伤  生物力学现象
 
Biomechanical study on different high-strength sutures and suture site for repairing posterior root tear of the medial meniscus
Abstract:

Objective: To compare biomechanical characteristic of different high-strength sutures and suture sites for repairing posterior root tear of the medial meniscus with modified Mason-Allen technique.

Methods: Forty-eight specimen of medial meniscus of knee joint from fresh porcine(female, aged from 5 to 9 months with an average of 7 months) were chosen and established experimental model. The samples were divided into red zone fixation group and red-white zone fixation group according to suture sites, 24 in each group; and then were randomly divided into 3 subgroups which 8 in each group, and fixed with Ethibond suture, Ultrabraid suture and FiberWire suture, respectively. Biomechanical tests were performed on universal electromagnetic and mechanical testing machine. Each specimen was underwent 1 000 cyclic tests on the first time, then pull-out test until failure. The maximum failure load, yield load, stiffness and displacement were analyzed.

Results: All specimen were successfully completed biomechanical tests. The failure mode of Ethibond group was caused by suture fracture; 6 cases of Ultrabraid suture group was caused by suture fracture which belong to red zone fixation group, 10 cases were caused by suture pull-out, which 2 cases belong to red zone fixation group, 8 cases belong to red-white zone fixation group;8 cases of FiberWire group was caused by suture pull-out. Biomechanical test showed that:(1) In terms of suture strength, comparison of the maximum failure load, yield load and stiffness showed that Ethibond suture groupP<0.05);comparison of cyclic displacement at 100, 500 and 1 000 cycles showed that Ethibond suture group>Ultrabraid suture group >FiberWire suture group, and had statistical differences among groups(P<0.05);the results showed the suture strength in Ethibond was the best, Ultrabraid suture took the second place, and FiberWire suture was the worst. (2) As for different suture sites, comparison of the maximum failure load, yield load and stiffness showed that red zone fixation group >red-white region fixation group, and had statistical difference between two groups(P<0.05);comparison of cyclic displacement at 100, 500 and 1 000 cycles showed that red zone fixation group P<0.05);the results showed that suture strength in red zone fixation group was better than that of red-white zone fixation group.

Conclusion: Mason-Allen suture could effectively fix posterior root tear of the medial meniscus and meet needs of early partial weight bearing after surgery. Suturing with Fiberwire in red zone is stronger and better for the meniscus healing and rehabilitation.
KEYWORDS:Sutures  Tibial meniscus injuries  Biomechnical phenomena
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王江涛,步建立,申学振,常晗,滕立佳,朱娟丽,刘洋,刘玉杰.采用不同缝线及缝合位点缝合内侧半月板后根部损伤的生物力学研究[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(5):442~447
英文格式:WANG Jiang-tao,BU Jian-li,SHEN Xue-zhen,CHANG Han,TENG Li-jia,ZHU Juan-li,LIU Yang,LIU Yu-jie.Biomechanical study on different high-strength sutures and suture site for repairing posterior root tear of the medial meniscus[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2021,34(5):442~447
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com