Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
自制导向器引导下双股钛缆与锁骨钩钢板治疗严重肩锁关节脱位
Hits: 2084   Download times: 590   Received:June 19, 2020    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
王俊 WANG Jun 温州医科大学附属萧山医院萧山区第一人民医院骨科, 浙江杭州 311201 Department of Orthopaedics, Xiaoshan First People's Hospital, Hangzhou Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou 311201, Zhejiang, China junee@126.com 
刘敏波 LIU Min-bo 温州医科大学附属萧山医院萧山区第一人民医院骨科, 浙江杭州 311201 Department of Orthopaedics, Xiaoshan First People's Hospital, Hangzhou Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou 311201, Zhejiang, China  
崔永锋 CUI Yong-feng 温州医科大学附属萧山医院萧山区第一人民医院骨科, 浙江杭州 311201 Department of Orthopaedics, Xiaoshan First People's Hospital, Hangzhou Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou 311201, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2021年34卷,第3期,第237-242页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.03.010


目的:比较钛缆仿生重建喙锁韧带与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。

方法:回顾分析2017年1月至2018年12月39例严重急性肩锁关节脱位患者的临床资料,其中双股钛缆组19例,其中男13例,女6例;年龄26~67;RockwoodⅢ型10例,Ⅳ型4,V型5例;交通伤8例,摔伤11例;受伤至手术时间3~6 d。钢板组20例,其中男15例,女5例;年龄25~71岁;Rockwood Ⅲ型11例,Ⅳ型4例,Ⅴ型5例;交通伤7例,摔伤13例;受伤至手术时间2~7 d。比较两组手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、花费以及手术前后VAS评分;手术前后采用Constant-Murley评分评估手术疗效。术后拍摄X线片观察肩锁关节脱位的复位及维持情况。同时记录并发症发生情况。

结果:36例患者获随访,时间12~14个月。两组术中出血量基本相同,手术切口两股钛缆组较短,手术时间钢板组较短,两股钛缆组手术费用少。术后1周与1年,两股钛缆组比钢板组疼痛轻。两股钛缆组术后1年比钢板组Constant-Murley评分高。术后X线片示两股钛缆组肩锁关节得到良好复位,有1例出现复位轻度丢失。钢板组在锁骨钩钢板取出后无复位丢失,8例患者出现锁骨远端骨萎缩或肩峰骨吸收。钢板组4例出现术后长期疼痛,术后功能障碍等诸多并发症。

结论:双股钛缆仿生重建喙锁韧带治疗严重急性肩锁关节脱位手术疗效优于锁骨钩钢板,创伤更小(无须二次手术),花费更低。
[关键词]:肩锁关节  脱位  喙锁韧带
 
Treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double strand titanium cable and clavicular hook plate guided by self-made guide device
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of titanium cable biomimetic reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods: The clinical data of 39 patients with severe acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed,19 patients in double strand titanium cable group,including 13 males and 6 females,aged from 26 to 67 years old;Rockwood classification:10 cases of type Ⅲ,4 cases of type Ⅳ and 5 cases of type Ⅴ;8 cases of traffic injury and 11 cases of fall injury;the time from injury to operation was 3 to 6 days. There were 20 patients in steel plate group,including 15 males and 5 females,aged from 25 to 71 years old. Rockwood classification:11 cases of type Ⅲ,4 cases of typeⅣ,5 cases of type Ⅴ;7 cases of traffic injury,13 cases of fall injury;the time from injury to operation was 2 to 7 days. The length of incision,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,cost,VAS score before and after operation,and Constant-Murley score before and after operation were compared between two groups. Postoperative X-ray films were taken to observe the reduction and maintenance of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Complications were recorded.

Results: Thirty-six patients were followed up for 12 to 14 months. The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the two groups was basically the same. The operation incision in double strand titanium cable group was shorter,the operation time in steel plate group was shorter,and the operation cost in double strand titanium cable group was less. One week and one year after operation,the pain of double strand titanium cable group was less than that of steel plate group. One year after operation,the Constant-Murley score of double strand titanium cable group was higher than that of steel plate group. The postoperative X-ray showed that the acromioclavicular joint in double strand titanium cable group was well reduced,and there was 1 case with slight reduction loss. In the plate group,there was no reduction loss after removal of the clavicular hook plate,and 8 patients had distal clavicular bone atrophy or acromion bone resorption. In steel plate group,4 cases had long-term postoperative pain,postoperative dysfunction and other complications.

Conclusion: The clinical effect of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with double strand titanium cable is better than that of clavicular hook plate in the treatment of severe acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation,with less trauma (no secondary operation) and lower cost.
KEYWORDS:Acromioclavicular joint  Dislocations  Coracoclavicular ligament
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王俊,刘敏波,崔永锋.自制导向器引导下双股钛缆与锁骨钩钢板治疗严重肩锁关节脱位[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(3):237~242
英文格式:WANG Jun,LIU Min-bo,CUI Yong-feng.Treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double strand titanium cable and clavicular hook plate guided by self-made guide device[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2021,34(3):237~242
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com