Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
带股骨距假体置换与髓内钉治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效对比
Hits: 3001   Download times: 782   Received:February 11, 2020    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
王强 WANG Qiang 浙江中医药大学附属金华中医院, 浙江 金华 321017 Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China  
冷燕奎 LENG Yan-kui 浙江中医药大学附属金华中医院, 浙江 金华 321017 Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China 1007336245@qq.com 
金斌 JIN Bin 浙江中医药大学附属金华中医院, 浙江 金华 321017 Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China  
吕杰 LYU Jie 浙江中医药大学附属金华中医院, 浙江 金华 321017 Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China  
胡庆华 HU Qing-hua 浙江中医药大学附属金华中医院, 浙江 金华 321017 Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China  
张勇胜 ZHANG Yong-sheng 浙江中医药大学附属金华中医院, 浙江 金华 321017 Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2020年33卷,第11期,第1017-1022页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.11.006
基金项目:金华市科技计划项目(编号:2019-4-062)
目的:分析采用带股骨距假体髋关节置换术与同期行闭合复位防旋股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)内固定术治疗高龄患者(≥ 80岁)股骨转子间不稳定型骨折(Evans Ⅲ、Ⅳ型)的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2016年6月至2018年3月采用假体置换与PFNA治疗的高龄股骨转子间不稳定型骨折患者60例,根据手术方式分为PFNA组与假体组,其中PFNA组男21例,女15例,年龄(84.3±2.9)岁;假体组男10例,女14例,年龄(82.9±2.4)岁。观察比较两组手术时间、术前与术后1 d血红蛋白差值、术后下地活动时间、住院时间及并发症发生情况,术后3、12个月行髋关节功能Harris评分。结果:患者均获得随访,时间12~24(19.3±4.8)个月,假体组1例1年后死于肺癌,随访终止。假体组手术时间长于PFNA组(P<0.05);术前后血红蛋白差值,假体组与PFNA组无差异(P>0.05);下地活动时间,假体组早于PFNA组(P<0.05);并发症出现数量,假体组少于PFNA组(P<0.05);治疗前假体组与PFNA组Harris评分差异无统计学意义,治疗后两组评分均较治疗前显著升高(P<0.05),术后3个月随访假体组评分高于髓内钉组(P<0.05),术后12个月差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。。结论:对高龄不稳定型股骨转子间骨折,尤其骨质疏松严重者,实施带股骨距假体髋关节置换术治疗是一种良好选择,有利于高龄患者术后功能锻炼和早期下地活动,减少并发症,提高生活质量,减轻家属及社会负担。
[关键词]:股骨骨折  髋假体  关节成形术,置换,髋  骨折固定术,髓内
 
Comparison of clinical efficacy of femoral calcar prosthesis replacement and intramedullary nail in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of hip arthroplasty with femoral calcar prosthesis and proximal femoral nail fixation(PFNA) in the treatment of elderly patients(≥ 80 years old) with unstable intertrochanteric fractures(Evans Ⅲ,Ⅳ). Methods: From June 2016 to March 2018,60 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with prosthetic replacement and PFNA were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical methods,they were divided into PFNA group and prosthesis group. In PFNA group there were including 21 males and 15 females,with an average age of(84.3±2.9) years old;in the prosthetic group,there were 10 males and 14 females with an average age of(82.9±2.4) years old. The operation time,hemoglobin difference between preoperative and postoperative 1 day,postoperative ambulation time,hospitalization time and complications were observed and compared between the two groups. Harris hip score was performed 3 and 12 months after operation. Results: All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months (19.3±4.8) months. One patient in the prosthesis group died of lung cancer one year later and the follow-up was terminated. The operation time of prosthetic group was longer than that of PFNA group(P<0.05);hemoglobin difference before and after operation had no difference between prosthetic group and PFNA group(P>0.05);the time of ambulation in prosthetic group was earlier than that in PFNA group(P<0.05); the number of complications in prosthetic group was less than that in PFNA group(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in Harris score between prosthetic group and PFNA group before treatment,but scores of both groups were significantly increased after treatment(P<0.05). After 3 months of follow-up,the score of prosthesis group was higher than that of intramedullary nail group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference at 12 months after operation(P>0.05). Conclusion: The elderly patients with intertrochanteric arthroplasty can reduce the burden of intertrochanteric arthroplasty and improve the quality of life.
KEYWORDS:Femoral fractures  Hip prosthesis  Arthroplasty,replacement,hip  Fracture fixation,intramedullary
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王强,冷燕奎,金斌,吕杰,胡庆华,张勇胜.带股骨距假体置换与髓内钉治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效对比[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(11):1017~1022
英文格式:WANG Qiang,LENG Yan-kui,JIN Bin,LYU Jie,HU Qing-hua,ZHANG Yong-sheng.Comparison of clinical efficacy of femoral calcar prosthesis replacement and intramedullary nail in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2020,33(11):1017~1022
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com