Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
局麻下股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗高危患者股骨转子间骨折
Hits: 2483   Download times: 921   Received:December 14, 2019    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
乔梁 QIAO Liang 徐州医科大学第二附属医院 徐州矿务集团总医院 骨科, 江苏 徐州 221006 Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China  
曹贞国 CAO Zhen-guo 徐州医科大学第二附属医院 徐州矿务集团总医院 骨科, 江苏 徐州 221006 Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China orthopa@163.com 
李华 LI Hua 徐州医科大学第二附属医院 徐州矿务集团总医院 骨科, 江苏 徐州 221006 Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China  
葛行新 GE Xing-xin 徐州医科大学第二附属医院 徐州矿务集团总医院 骨科, 江苏 徐州 221006 Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China  
张姚 ZHANG Yao 徐州医科大学第二附属医院 徐州矿务集团总医院 骨科, 江苏 徐州 221006 Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China  
魏东 WEI Dong 徐州医科大学第二附属医院 徐州矿务集团总医院 骨科, 江苏 徐州 221006 Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2020年33卷,第4期,第317-321页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.04.006


目的:比较局麻和全麻下行股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)治疗高危患者股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。

方法:2018年2月至2019年2月因股骨转子间骨折行PFNA手术的32例患者,16例局麻下行PFNA手术,男9例,女7例,年龄54~98(82.43±9.30)岁,住院时间(10.94±5.30) d;16例全麻下行PFNA手术,男6例,女10例,年龄51~83(72.69±9.48)岁,住院时间(12.88±4.12) d。记录患者性别、年龄、骨折AO分型、术前VAS疼痛评分、术前ASA病情分级、术后第1天静息状态VAS评分、住院费用及住院时长。

结果:32例患者术后均恢复较好,伤口愈合良好,恢复下肢活动能力。患者术后平均随访时间4.6个月。两组患者年龄差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);患者性别比、骨折AO分型、术前VAS疼痛评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组ASA分级比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两组ASA ≥ Ⅲ级患者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。局麻组术中VAS疼痛评分4.19±1.50,患者尚可忍受。两组术后第1天静息状态VAS评分、平均住院费用及平均住院时长比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论:多学科诊疗模式下局麻为主的多种镇痛镇静方式下PFNA手术的方法是安全可行的,局麻手术患者年龄更大,并且ASA ≥ Ⅲ级患者的比例更高,对于部分老年高危患者局麻比全麻手术是更好的适应证。
[关键词]:股骨骨折  髋骨折  麻醉,局麻  骨折固定术,髓内
 
Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation under local anesthesia for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in high-risk patients
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy under local anesthesia and general anesthesia proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of femur in high risk patients.

Methods: From February 2018 to February 2019,32 patients underwent PFNA operation due to intertrochanteric fracture of femur,including 16 patients undergoing PFNA operation under local anesthesia,9 males and 7 females,aged 54 to 98(82.43±9.30) years and hospitalized for (10.94±5.30) days;16 patients undergoing PFNA operation under general anesthesia,6 males and 10 females,aged 51 to 83 (72.69±9.48) years and hospitalized for (12.88±4.12) days. The patients' gender,age,fracture AO classification,preoperative VAS(visual analogue score),preoperative ASA condition grade,postoperative 1st day resting state VAS,hospitalization cost and length of stay were recorded.

Results: All patients recovered well,the wound healed well,and the ability of lower limb activity was restored. The average follow-up time was 4.6 months. There was significant difference in age between two groups(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in sex ratio,AO classification of fracture and VAS before operation(P>0.05). There was no significant difference on ASA between two groups (P>0.05),but there was significant difference on ASA ≥ grade Ⅲ between two groups(P<0.05). In local anesthesia group,VAS pain score was 4.19±1.50,which was tolerable. There was no significant difference in postoperative 1st day resting state VAS,average hospitalization cost and average length of stay between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion: Under the multi-disciplinary diagnosis and treatment mode,the method of PFNA operation is safe and feasible,the patients with local anesthesia are older,and the proportion of patients with ASA ≥ grade Ⅲ is higher,which is better for some elderly high-risk patients than general anesthesia.
KEYWORDS:Femoral fractures  Hip fractures  Anesthesia,local  Fracture fixation,intramedullary
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:乔梁,曹贞国,李华,葛行新,张姚,魏东.局麻下股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗高危患者股骨转子间骨折[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(4):317~321
英文格式:QIAO Liang,CAO Zhen-guo,LI Hua,GE Xing-xin,ZHANG Yao,WEI Dong.Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation under local anesthesia for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in high-risk patients[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2020,33(4):317~321
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com