Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
经皮桥接钢板与逆行耻骨上支髓内螺钉固定骨盆前环骨折的疗效比较
Hits: 2455   Download times: 926   Received:May 20, 2019    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
王伟斌 WANG Wei-bin 宁波市第二医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315010 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China 13566562481@163.com 
袁欣华 YUAN Xin-hua 宁波市第二医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315010 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China  
郑轶 ZHENG Yi 宁波市第二医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315010 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China  
扶青松 FU Qing-song 宁波市第二医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315010 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China  
吴海挺 WU Hai-ting 宁波市第二医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315010 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China  
庞清江 PANG Qing-jiang 宁波市第二医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315010 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2020年33卷,第1期,第47-52页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.01.009
基金项目:宁波市自然科学基金(编号:2016A610145;2016A610142)


目的:比较经皮桥接钢板与逆行耻骨上支髓内螺钉固定骨盆前环骨折的疗效。

方法:回顾分析2013年1月至2017年6月收治的40例累及前环的不稳定性骨盆骨折患者,根据固定方式分成两组,其中经皮桥接钢板组(钢板组)20例,男9例,女11例;骨折按Tile分型,B1型1例,B2型14例,B3型2例,C1型2例,C2型1例。逆行耻骨上支髓内螺钉组(螺钉组)20例,男10例,女10例;骨折按Tile分型,B1型1例,B2型12例,B3型3例,C1型3例,C2型1例。分别对两组的手术切口长度、手术时间、透视次数、术中出血量、术后Matta评分、术后并发症及末次随访Majeed功能评分进行比较分析。

结果:两组病例均获随访,钢板组随访8~15(12.25±2.24)个月;螺钉组随访6~18(12.4±2.6)个月,两组差异无统计学意义。螺钉组手术切口长度(3.85±0.75) cm短于钢板组(7.05±1.39) cm;螺钉组手术时间(27.70±5.36) min长于钢板组(15.10±2.07) min;螺钉组透视次数(6.00±1.83)次大于钢板组(3.75±1.33)次。螺钉组出血量(22.50±10.82) ml与钢板组(25.25±9.93) ml相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后Matta评价及末次随访Majeed功能评分差异均无统计学意义。螺钉组发生1例浅表皮肤感染,钢板组1例浅表皮肤感染,1例股外侧皮神经短暂性麻痹。

结论:经皮桥接钢板与逆行耻骨上支髓内螺钉固定骨盆前环骨折疗效相当。经皮钢板组的手术时间更短、术中透视次数更少,而且学习曲线短,但术中需注意股外侧皮神经变异。
[关键词]:骨盆  骨折  骨折固定术,内
 
Comparative study of percutaneous bridging plate and retrograde suprapubic intramedullary screw fixation for anterior pelvic ring fracture
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the effect of percutaneous bridging plate and retrograde suprapubic intramedullary screw in the treatment of anterior ring fracture of pelvis.

Methods: From January 2013 to June 2017,40 patients with unstable pelvic fractures involving anterior ring were analyzed retrospectively. According to the fixation method,they were divided into two groups,there were 20 patients in percutaneous bridging plate group (plate group) including 9 males and 11 females;according to tile classification,fractures were classified as type B1 in 1 case,type B2 in 14,type B3 in 2,type C1 in 2 and type C2 in 1. There were 20 cases in retrograde suprapubic intramedullary screw group(screw group) including 10 males and 10 females; according to tile classification,there were 1 case of type B1,12 cases of type B2,3 cases of type B3,3 cases of type C1 and 1 case of type C2. The incision length,operation time,times of fluoroscopy,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative Matta score,postoperative complications and the last follow-up Majeed function score of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results: Both groups were followed up for 8 to 15(12.25±2.24) months in the plate group and 6 to 18(12.4±2.6) months in the screw group,there was no significant difference between the two groups. The incision length of screw group was (3.85±0.75) cm shorter than that of steel plate group(7.05±1.39) cm;the operation time of screw group was (27.70±5.36) min longer than that of steel plate group (15.10±2.07) min;the fluoroscopy times of screw group was (6.00±1.83) more than that of steel plate group (3.75±1.33). The bleeding volume was (22.50±10.82) ml in of screw group,(25.00±9.93) ml in steel plate group,there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Matta evaluation and Majeed functional score in the last follow-up. One case of superficial skin infection occurred in screw group,one case of superficial skin infection and one case of transient paralysis of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve occurred in steel plate group.

Conclusion: Percutaneous bridging plate and retrograde suprapubic intramedullary screw fixation of pelvic anterior ring fracture have the same effect. The operation time of the percutaneous plate group was shorter,the times of intraoperative fluoroscopy was less,and the learning curve was shorter,but the variation of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve should be noted during the operation.
KEYWORDS:Pelvis  Fractures  Fracture fixation,internal
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王伟斌,袁欣华,郑轶,扶青松,吴海挺,庞清江.经皮桥接钢板与逆行耻骨上支髓内螺钉固定骨盆前环骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(1):47~52
英文格式:WANG Wei-bin,YUAN Xin-hua,ZHENG Yi,FU Qing-song,WU Hai-ting,PANG Qing-jiang.Comparative study of percutaneous bridging plate and retrograde suprapubic intramedullary screw fixation for anterior pelvic ring fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2020,33(1):47~52
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com