Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
急性创伤性颈髓损伤患者术前机械通气的危险因素分析
Hits: 1734   Download times: 843   Received:November 19, 2018    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
王荣 WANG Rong 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China  
马鑫文 MA Xin-wen 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China  
杨涛 YANG Tao 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China  
胡炜 HU Wei 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China  
董振宇 DONG Zhen-yu 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China  
刘岩路 LIU Yan-lu 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China  
黄异飞 HUANG Yi-fei 新疆医科大学附属中医医院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000 The Affiliated Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China 779278662@qq.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2019年32卷,第10期,第919-922页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.10.009


目的:分析急性创伤性颈髓损伤(TCSCI)患者术前机械通气的相关危险因素。

方法:将2016年11月至2018年5月期间收治的59例TCSCI患者根据术前是否给予机械辅助通气分为机械通气组(37例)和非机械通气组(22例)。最常见伤因是高处坠落(30例,50.8%),其次是交通事故(22例,37.3%),最常见的神经损伤平面是C1-C4(36例,61%)。运用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤程度和ASIA运动得分(AMS)评估受影响的神经系统平面和脊髓损伤的程度,使用创伤严重程度评分(ISS)来评估损伤的严重程度。运用多变量Logistic回归分析TCSCI机械通气的危险因素。并运用ROC曲线评估AMS和ISS在预测机械通气的价值。

结果:单变量分析结果显示机械通气组的男性、完全损伤、存在相关损伤的比例均显著高于非机械通气组(P<0.05)。机械通气组的AMS评分显著低于无机械通气组(16.4±10.7和39.1±9.5,P<0.001),ISS评分显著高于无机械通气组(31.6±8.0和26.5±6.7,P=0.015)。多变量Logistic回归分析结果显示,AMS[OR=3.340,95% CI(1.321,6.242),P<0.001]和ISS[OR=1.120,95% CI(0.306,3.786),P<0.001]是预测需要机械通气的显著危险因素。ROC分析结果显示AMS的ROC曲线下面积显著高于ISS(0.899和0.685,P<0.05)。

结论:患者入院时的AMS和ISS可以作为早期是否给予机械辅助通气的预测指标。
[关键词]:创伤性颈髓损伤  机械通气  危险因素
 
Analysis of risk factors for preoperative mechanical ventilation in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury
Abstract:

Objective:To analyze the risk factors associated with mechanical ventilation before surgery in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury(TCSCI).

Methods:According to whether preoperative mechanical ventilation,59 patients with TCSCI admitted to our hospital from November 2016 to May 2018 were divided into mechanical ventilation(MV)group (37 cases) and non-mechanical ventilation(non-MV) group (22 cases). Falling from height was the most common causes of injury(30 cases,50.8%),then was traffic accident(22 cases,37.3%). The most common paraplegic plane was in C1-C4(36 cases,61%). American Spinal Cord Injury Association(ASIA) injury degree and ASIA exercise score(AMS) were used to assess the extent of affected neurological plane and spinal cord injury. Trauma severity score(ISS) was used to evaluate the severity of the injury. Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for mechanical ventilation in TCSCI. ROC curves were used to assess the value of AMS and ISS in predicting mechanical ventilation.

Results:Univariate analysis showed that the percentage of male,complete injury and related injuries in the MV group were significantly higher than those in the non-MV group(P<0.05). The AMS score of the MV group was significantly lower than that of the non-MV group (16.4±10.7 vs 39.1±9.5,P<0.001),and the ISS score was significantly higher than that of the non-MV group(31.6±8.0 vs 26.5±6.7,P=0.015). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that AMS[OR=3.340,95% CI(1.321,6.242),P<0.001] and ISS[OR=1.120,95% CI(0.306,3.786),P<0.001] were significant risk factors on predicting the need for mechanical ventilation.The ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC) of AMS was significantly higher than that of ISS(0.899 vs 0.685,P<0.05).

Conclusion:AMS and ISS at admission can be used as predictors of early mechanically assisted ventilation.
KEYWORDS:Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury  Mechanical ventilation  Risk factors
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王荣,马鑫文,杨涛,胡炜,董振宇,刘岩路,黄异飞.急性创伤性颈髓损伤患者术前机械通气的危险因素分析[J].中国骨伤,2019,32(10):919~922
英文格式:WANG Rong,MA Xin-wen,YANG Tao,HU Wei,DONG Zhen-yu,LIU Yan-lu,HUANG Yi-fei.Analysis of risk factors for preoperative mechanical ventilation in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2019,32(10):919~922
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com