Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
全关节镜下内引流技术治疗腘窝囊肿
Hits: 2161   Download times: 1119   Received:August 20, 2018    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
倪建龙 NI Jian-long 西安交通大学第二附属医院骨一科, 陕西 西安 710004 The First Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China  
时志斌 SHI Zhi-bin 西安交通大学第二附属医院骨一科, 陕西 西安 710004 The First Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China shizb1001@163.com 
樊立宏 FAN Li-hong 西安交通大学第二附属医院骨一科, 陕西 西安 710004 The First Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China  
李涤尘 LI Di-chen 西安交通大学第二附属医院骨一科, 陕西 西安 710004 The First Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China  
党晓谦 DANG Xiao-qian 西安交通大学第二附属医院骨一科, 陕西 西安 710004 The First Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China  
王坤正 WANG Kun-zheng 西安交通大学第二附属医院骨一科, 陕西 西安 710004 The First Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2019年32卷,第5期,第454-458页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.05.013


目的:对比全关节镜下内引流技术与关节镜联合后方小切口技术治疗腘窝囊肿的临床疗效。

方法:2015年1月至2017年1月收治腘窝囊肿患者60例,男29例,女31例,年龄30~65(47.8±2.5)岁,病程(8.5±4.2)个月。其中30例接受全关节镜下内引流技术治疗(全关节镜组),30例接受关节镜联合后方小切口技术治疗(关节镜联合小切口组)。对两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后Rauschning和Lindgren分级0级恢复率及膝关节Lysholm评分进行对比。

结果:全关节镜组29例和关节镜联合小切口组28例获得随访,时间8~20(12.8±2.1)个月。手术时间:全关节镜组(45.32±5.71)min,关节镜联合小切口组(44.56±3.85)min;术后Rauschning和Lindgren分级0级恢复:全关节镜组23例,关节镜联合小切口组22例;术后膝关节Lysholm评分:全关节镜组84.5±11.2,关节镜联合小切口组83.2±12.7;两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术中出血量:全关节镜组(5.32±1.25)ml,关节镜联合小切口组(20.75±8.18)ml;切口长度:全关节镜组(1.51±0.34)cm,关节镜联合小切口组(7.34±0.75)cm;两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组末次随访均行膝关节MRI检查,无囊肿复发病例。

结论:全关节镜下内引流技术与关节镜联合后方小切口
[关键词]:窝囊肿  关节镜  引流术
 
Total arthroscopic internal drainage technique for the treatment of popliteal cyst
Abstract:

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of total arthroscopic internal drainage and arthroscopic combined with posterior small incision in the treatment of popliteal cyst.

Methods:From January 2015 to January 2017,60 patients with popliteal cyst were treated,including 29 males and 31 females,aged 30 to 65(47.8±2.5) years old,with a course of disease (8.5±4.2) months. Among them,30 cases received total arthroscopic internal drainage for popliteal fossa cyst(total arthroscopic group),30 cases received arthroscopic combined with posterior small incision for popliteal fossa cyst(arthroscopic combined with small incision group). The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,incision length,Rauschning and Lindgren grade 0 recovery rate and Lysholm score were compared between the two groups.

Results:Twenty-nine patients in total arthroscopy group were followed up,and 28 patients in arthroscopy combined with small incision group were followed up for 8 to 20(12.8±2.1) months. Operation time:total arthroscopic group(45.32±5.71) min,arthroscopic combined small incision group (44.56±3.85) min;Rauschning and Lindgren grade 0 recovery:23 cases in total arthroscopic group,22 cases in arthroscopic combined small incision group;postoperative Lysholm score:total arthroscopic group 84.5±11.2,arthroscopic combined small incision group 83.2±12.7;there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Intraoperative bleeding volume:total arthroscopic group(5.32±1.25) ml,arthroscopic combined small incision group(20.75±8.18) ml;incision length:total arthroscopic group (1.51±0.34) cm,arthroscopic combined small incision group (7.34±0.75) cm;the difference between the two groups was significant(P<0.05). At the last follow-up,the knee joint was examined by magnetic resonance imaging,and no recurrence of cyst was found.

Conclusion:Total arthroscopic internal drainage and arthroscopic combined with posterior small incision technique for popliteal fossa cyst with intra-articular lesions have the same clinical effect,but less trauma and faster recovery.
KEYWORDS:Popliteal cyst  Arthroscopes  Drainage
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:倪建龙,时志斌,樊立宏,李涤尘,党晓谦,王坤正.全关节镜下内引流技术治疗腘窝囊肿[J].中国骨伤,2019,32(5):454~458
英文格式:NI Jian-long,SHI Zhi-bin,FAN Li-hong,LI Di-chen,DANG Xiao-qian,WANG Kun-zheng.Total arthroscopic internal drainage technique for the treatment of popliteal cyst[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2019,32(5):454~458
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com