Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
不同方法治疗不稳定骨盆骨折中前环损伤的有限元分析
Hits: 1949   Download times: 1012   Received:April 18, 2018    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
刘敏 LIU Min 温州医科大学附属第三医院骨科, 浙江 温州 325204 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang, China  
周晓赛 ZHOU Xiao-sai 瑞安市中医院放射科, 浙江 温州 325204  
王俊诚 WANG Jun-cheng 温州医科大学附属第三医院骨科, 浙江 温州 325204 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang, China  
刘良乐 LIU Liang-le 温州医科大学附属第三医院骨科, 浙江 温州 325204 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang, China 153043716@qq.com 
王伟良 WANG Wei-liang 温州医科大学附属第三医院骨科, 浙江 温州 325204 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang, China  
蔡春元 CAI Chun-yuan 温州医科大学附属第三医院骨科, 浙江 温州 325204 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang, China  
杨国敬 YANG Guo-jing 温州医科大学附属第三医院骨科, 浙江 温州 325204 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2019年32卷,第2期,第156-160页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.02.012
基金项目:浙江省医药卫生一般研究计划(编号:2014KYB262);温州市科学技术局项目(编号:Y20130330)


目的:比较5种不同固定方法治疗不稳定骨盆骨折中前环损伤的生物力学稳定性,为临床治疗提供参考。

方法:使用三维有限元方法,建立一侧骶髂关节脱位合并耻骨支骨折的不稳定骨盆骨折模型(Tile C型),模拟前方采用5种不同的固定方法,后方统一采用骶髂螺钉进行固定,并在模拟站立状态下比较分析不同组合固定方法治疗后的骨盆环的von Mises应力及应变分布情况。

结果:竖直方向500 N载荷加载后,前方骨折处最大应力3.56 MPa(前方外固定架组),骶髂关节和骨折处总位移和Y轴上垂直位移在应力下均未超过1.5 mm。其中前方经皮入路组和前方外固定架组在内固定、骨折前方、骶髂关节处的最大应力明显大于改良Stoppa入路组、传统的髂腹股沟入路组、空心螺钉组,且在骶髂关节和骨折处的总位移和Y轴上垂直位移也大于其他3组。

结论:不稳定性骨盆骨折中的前环损伤在5种组合方法植入物的固定后均能得到明显的改善,但采用改良Stoppa入路、髂腹股沟入路、前方空心钉固定方法治疗前环损伤在生物力学总体性能要优于前方经皮入路和前方外固定架治疗的方法。
[关键词]:骨盆  骨折  生物力学  骨折固定术,内  有限元分析
 
Finite element analysis of anterior ring injuries in unstable pelvic fractures treated by different methods
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the biomechanical stability of different fixation methods for anterior ring injury of unstable pelvic fractures, and to provide reference for clinical treatment.

Methods: An unstable pelvic fracture model (Tile C) with one side of the sacroiliac joint dislocation and the pubic rami fracture was constructed via three-dimensional finite element analysis. Five different fixation methods were used in the front, and the rear was fixed with sacroiliac screws. The von Mises stress and strain distributions of different combinations of fixation methods were analyzed under mimicking standing conditions.

Results: After being loaded with 500 N vertically, the maximum stress in the anterior fracture was 3.56 MPa in anterior pelvic external fixation (AEF) group, the total displacement and the vertical displacement of the Y axis at the sacroiliac joint and the fracture were not more than 1.5 mm. The maximum stress at fixation, the front of the fracture and sacroiliac joints in the anterior pelvic subcutaneous approach (APA) group and AEF, was significantly higher than anterior modified Stoppa approach (ASA) group, anterior pelvic Ilioinguinal approach (AIA) group, and canulated screw fixation (CSF) group. The total displacement and the vertical displacement of the Y axis at the sacroiliac joint and the fracture in APA group and AEF group were also greater than the other three groups.

Conclusion: Anterior ring injury of unstable pelvic fractures can be significantly improved after the fixation of the implants in the five combined methods. However, overall biomechanical properties of ASA, AIA and CSF group are superior to APA and AEF group.
KEYWORDS:Pelvis  Fractures  Biomechanics  Fracture fixation,internal  Finite element analysis
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:刘敏,周晓赛,王俊诚,刘良乐,王伟良,蔡春元,杨国敬.不同方法治疗不稳定骨盆骨折中前环损伤的有限元分析[J].中国骨伤,2019,32(2):156~160
英文格式:LIU Min,ZHOU Xiao-sai,WANG Jun-cheng,LIU Liang-le,WANG Wei-liang,CAI Chun-yuan,YANG Guo-jing.Finite element analysis of anterior ring injuries in unstable pelvic fractures treated by different methods[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2019,32(2):156~160
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com