Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
胫骨内侧平台大块劈裂骨折手术方式和疗效分析
Hits: 1610   Download times: 1056   Received:February 06, 2018    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张勇 ZHANG Yong 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China zhangberry2011@163.com 
王庆 WANG Qing 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
何贤峰 HE Xian-feng 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
校佰平 XIAO Bai-ping 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
庄云强 ZHUANG Yun-qiang 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
胡勇 HU Yong 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
马维虎 MA Wei-hu 宁波市第六医院创伤骨科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2018年31卷,第9期,第853-857页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.09.014
基金项目:2018宁波市鄞州区农社类科技项目(编号:20180137)


目的:探讨经内侧入路保护内侧结构,两个不同方向内固定治疗以内侧大块劈裂为主的胫骨平台骨折的可行性和有效性。

方法:自2010年1月至2016年1月采用膝内侧切口保护内侧软组织结构,不同方向固定胫骨内侧骨折块治疗涉及大块劈裂的胫骨内侧平台骨折患者21例,男17例,女4例;年龄27~63(39.2±3.2)岁。术前影像学检查(X线或CT)确诊,取膝关节内侧切口入路,保护膝内侧结构同时行内侧和内后侧钢板支撑内固定术;合并外侧平台骨折予外侧或外后侧切口复位固定。术后即刻根据Rasmussen放射学评分标准评价骨折复位情况,术后1年随访时根据美国特种外科医院(Hospital for Special Surgery,HSS)膝关节评分系统评定疗效。术后通过X线及临床检查判断骨折愈合时间,记录并发症及相应转归。

结果:术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,未见明显并发症。21例患者术后均获随访,时间10~24(17.2±1.7)个月。骨折均愈合,愈合时间为9~16(11.1±3.2)周。术后骨折复位Rasmussen放射学评分1~18(16.7±1.5)分;优16例,良3例,可2例。末次随访时HSS膝关节评分60~100(87.3±6.7)分;优18例,良2例,可1例。

结论:对于大块劈裂的胫骨内侧平台骨折,内侧切口、充分保护膝内侧结构、两个不同方向支撑钢板固定方法可行,近期疗效满意。
[关键词]:胫骨骨折  膝关节  骨折固定术,内
 
Surgical methods and curative effect of tibial plateau fracture with medial large block split
Abstract:

Objective: To explore the clinical effects of protecting the internal structure of the knee and internal fixation through two different directions for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures with medial large block split.

Methods: From January 2010 to January 2016,data of 21 patients of tibial plateau with medial large block split fractures who were treated with protecting the internal structure of the knee and internal fixation through two different directions were retrospectively analyzed,including 17 males and 4 females,with an average age of (39.2±3.2) years old ranging from 27 to 63 years. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs as well as computed tomography(CT) images were obtained in the course of preoperative. It was made in the operation to protect medial knee structure,combining with internal fixation via two different directions plates(medial and posteromedial). If the posterolateral condyle fracture was involved,a plate was applied through posterolateral approach. Rasmussen score was used for radiological assessment,and HSS knee score was used for efficacy assessment at 1 year after operation. The fracture healing time was judged by X-ray and clinical examinations,additionally,the complications and corresponding outcomes were also recorded.

Results: All patients were followed up for 10 to 24 months with an average of(17.2±1.7) months. All fractures were healed,the healing time was 9 to 16 weeks with an average of(11.1±3.2) weeks. The Rasmussen score after surgery was 1 to 18 points with an average of(16.7±1.5) points. Sixteen cases got excellent,3 good and 2 fair. At the final follow-up,HSS functional scores ranged from 60 to 100 points with an average of (87.3±6.7) points,the result was excellent in 18 cases,good in 2 cases and fair in 1 case.

Conclusion: For a split fracture of the medial tibial plateau,the medial incision,full protection of the medial knee structure,and two different directions of supporting plate fixation are feasible,and the short-term effect is satisfactory.
KEYWORDS:Tibial fractures  Knee joint  Fracture fixation,internal
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张勇,王庆,何贤峰,校佰平,庄云强,胡勇,马维虎.胫骨内侧平台大块劈裂骨折手术方式和疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2018,31(9):853~857
英文格式:ZHANG Yong,WANG Qing,HE Xian-feng,XIAO Bai-ping,ZHUANG Yun-qiang,HU Yong,MA Wei-hu.Surgical methods and curative effect of tibial plateau fracture with medial large block split[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2018,31(9):853~857
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com