| 闭合复位加压空心螺钉内固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的疗效观察 |
|
Hits: 1924
Download times: 1411
Received:May 20, 2017
|
| 作者 | Author | 单位 | Unit | E-Mail |
| 胡翔 |
HU Xiang |
甘肃中医药大学, 甘肃 兰州 73000 |
|
|
| 刘保健 |
LIU Bao-jian |
甘肃中医药大学附属医院关节外科, 甘肃 兰州 730000 |
Department of Jiont Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China |
lbj@zyxyfy.com |
| 温孝明 |
WEN Xiao-ming |
甘肃中医药大学附属医院关节外科, 甘肃 兰州 730000 |
Department of Jiont Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China |
|
| 郑永浩 |
ZHENG Yong-hao |
甘肃中医药大学, 甘肃 兰州 73000 |
|
|
| 贾柯 |
JIA Ke |
甘肃中医药大学, 甘肃 兰州 73000 |
|
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2018年31卷，第2期，第111-114页 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.003 |
| 基金项目:兰州市科技发展计划项目（项目编号：2014-1-26） |
|
目的：探讨闭合复位加压空心螺钉内固定在中青年股骨颈骨折治疗的临床疗效。
方法：自2013年6月至2016年12月采用闭合复位加压空心螺钉内固定治疗33例中青年股骨颈骨折，其中男17例，女16例，年龄19~59岁，平均38.5岁；左侧20例，右侧13例；受伤至手术时间为2~5 d，平均3 d。按照Garden分型：Ⅰ型1例，Ⅱ型11例，Ⅲ型18例，Ⅳ型3例。术后定期随访，复查髋关节X线片，了解骨愈合和股骨头坏死情况，末次随访采用髋关节Harris功能评分进行疗效评价。
结果：手术时间30~50 min，术中出血量20~70 ml。33例患者均获得随访，时间8~42个月，平均24个月。末次随访髋关节Harris功能评分：优18例，良10例，中2例，差3例，其中疼痛（40.61±5.08）分，功能（38.94±6.78）分，畸形（3.88±0.69）分，运动范围（3.70±0.64）分，总分（87.12±11.98）分。30例达到骨性愈合，愈合时间4~12个月，平均7.5个月，2例患者出现骨折不愈合（均为Garden Ⅳ型），1例患者发生股骨头坏死（Garden Ⅳ型），所有患者未出现术后感染、内固定松动、再骨折等并发症。
结论：闭合复位加压空心螺钉内固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折具有方法简单、创伤小、固定牢靠等优势，骨折愈合率高，股骨头坏死风险低，临床疗效满意。 |
| [关键词]:股骨颈骨折 闭合复位 空心加压螺钉 骨折固定术,内 |
| |
| Clinical observation of closed reduction and compression cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients |
|
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of internal fixation with closed reduction and hollow compression screws for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients.
Methods: From June 2013 to December 2016,33 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures were treated with hollow compression screws fixation including 17 males and 16 females with an average age of 38.5 years old ranged from 19 to 59 years old;20 cases were on the left side and 13 cases on the right side;the time from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 5 days with an average of 3 days. According to Garden classification,1 case were type Ⅰ,11 cases were type Ⅱ,18 cases were type Ⅲ,3 cases were type Ⅳ. During regular follow-up after operation,through the hip joint X-ray,the healing situation of bone and osteonecrosis were observed. The Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of the final follow-up.
Results: The operation time was from 30 to 50 minutes,the blood loss during operation was 20 to 70 ml. All patients were followed up for 8 to 42 months with an average of 24 months. At the final follow-up,the Harris score of hip joint was excellent in 18 cases,good in 10 cases,fair in 2 cases and poor in 3 cases. Among them,the pain scores were 40.61±5.08,function scores were 38.94±6.78,malformation scores were 3.88±0.69,motion range scores were 3.70±0.64 and the total scores were 87.12±11.98. Thirty cases achieved bone healing,the healing time was 4 to 12 months with an average of 7.5 months,2 patients occurred with nonunion (Garden type Ⅳ),1 patient with femoral head necrosis (Garden type Ⅳ). All patients had no postoperative infection,internal fixation loosening,refracture and other complications.
Conclusion: In treating the young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fracture,closed reduction and hollow compression screw fixation has advantages of simple,stable fixation,less trauma,high rate of fracture healing,osteonecrosis of the femoral head with low risk and satisfactory clinical effect. |
| KEYWORDS:Femoral neck fracture Closed reduction Hollow compression screws Fracture fixation,internal |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 胡翔,刘保健,温孝明,郑永浩,贾柯.闭合复位加压空心螺钉内固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J].中国骨伤,2018,31(2):111~114 |
| 英文格式: | HU Xiang,LIU Bao-jian,WEN Xiao-ming,ZHENG Yong-hao,JIA Ke.Clinical observation of closed reduction and compression cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2018,31(2):111~114 |
|
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
