Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
人工髋关节置换和空心钉内固定治疗高龄患者股骨颈骨折的临床疗效对比
Hits: 1887   Download times: 1553   Received:November 20, 2017    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张立志 ZHANG Li-zhi 大连医科大学陆军总医院联合培养基地, 北京 100700  
高杰 GAO Jie 中国人民解放军陆军总医院骨科, 北京 100700 Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of PLA Army, Beijing 100700, China  
张志成 ZHANG Zhi-cheng 中国人民解放军陆军总医院骨科, 北京 100700 Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of PLA Army, Beijing 100700, China  
王晓伟 WANG Xiao-wei 中国人民解放军陆军总医院骨科, 北京 100700 Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of PLA Army, Beijing 100700, China  
张建政 ZHANG Jian-zheng 中国人民解放军陆军总医院骨科, 北京 100700 Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of PLA Army, Beijing 100700, China  
孙天胜 SUN Tian-sheng 中国人民解放军陆军总医院骨科, 北京 100700 Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of PLA Army, Beijing 100700, China suntiansheng-@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2018年31卷,第2期,第103-110页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.002
基金项目:青年科学基金项目(编号:81401846)


目的:研究比较不同的手术方法治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。

方法:选择自2013年1月至2016年6月收治高龄股骨颈患者144例,根据手术方式分为人工髋关节置换组(关节置换组)和空心钉内固定组(内固定组)。其中关节置换组89例,男28例,女61例,平均年龄(84.10±3.10)岁;内固定组55例,男20例,女35例,平均年龄(86.80±2.88)岁。比较两组患者术前基本资料、术后并发症、死亡率及术后髋关节Harris评分等。

结果:144例术后均获得完整随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均18个月。两组患者在性别、骨折侧别、术前合并症、骨质疏松、ASA评分、受伤至手术时间、术后转ICU人数、围手术期死亡人数上差异不明显。但是内固定组较关节置换组年龄更大(t=5.311,P<0.05);关节置换组术前骨折移位程度高于内固定组(χ2=6.894,P=0.009<0.05);内固定组在手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、围手术期输血人次上明显优于关节置换组(P<0.05);关节置换组在术后Harris评分高于内固定组(P<0.05)。

结论:对于高龄股骨颈患者,若骨折存在明显移位(Garden Ⅲ、Ⅳ型),首选人工髋关节置换,其术后并发症相对较少,关节功能恢复满意。若骨折移位不明显(GardenⅠ、Ⅱ型)或患者合并较多内科疾病,身体条件较差,手术耐受差,术后预期寿命不高,首选闭合复位空心钉内固定。
[关键词]:股骨颈骨折  老年人  关节成形术,置换,髋  骨折固定术,内
 
Comparison of clinical effects of total artificial hip replacement and cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients
Abstract:

Objective: To compare of clinical effects of different surgical methods in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures.

Methods: From January 2013 to June 2016,144 elderly patients with femoral neck were treated and divided into artificial hip replacement group and cannulated screw fixation group according to the surgical methods. In the total hip arthroplasty group,there were 89 cases,28 males and 61 females,with an average age of(84.10±3.10) years old;Hollow nail fixation group 55 cases,20 males and 35 females,with an average age of (86.80±2.88) years. Preoperative patients data,postoperative complications,mortality and postoperative Harris hip score were compared between the two groups.

Result: A total of 144 cases were followed up for 12 to 36 months with an average of 18 months. There was no significant difference between two groups in gender,fracture side,preoperative complications,osteoporosis,ASA score,injury to surgery interval,the number of patients admitted to ICU and perioperative death. However,the patients in hollow screw fixation group was older than the joint replacement group(t=5.311,P<0.05);The degree of preoperative fracture displacement in the joint replacement group was higher than that in the hollow nail fixation group(χ2=6.894,P=0.009<0.05);Hollow nail fixation group in operation time,hospital stay,intraoperative blood loss,perioperative blood transfusion was significantly better than the number of joint replacement group(P<0.05);The Harris score of the joint replacement group was higher than that of the hollow screw fixation group(P<0.05).

Conclusion: For elderly femoral neck patients,if there is a significant shift in the fracture (Garden Ⅲ,Ⅳ),the preferred treatment is hip replacement. Postoperative complications are relatively small,satisfactory joint function recovery. If the fracture displacement is not obvious (Garden typeⅠ,Ⅱ) or patients with more medical diseases,poor physical condition,poor surgical tolerance,postoperative life expectancy is not high,the first choice is closed reduction and cannulated screw fixation.
KEYWORDS:Femoral neck fractures  Aged  Arthroplasty,replacement,hip  Fracture fixation,internal
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张立志,高杰,张志成,王晓伟,张建政,孙天胜.人工髋关节置换和空心钉内固定治疗高龄患者股骨颈骨折的临床疗效对比[J].中国骨伤,2018,31(2):103~110
英文格式:ZHANG Li-zhi,GAO Jie,ZHANG Zhi-cheng,WANG Xiao-wei,ZHANG Jian-zheng,SUN Tian-sheng.Comparison of clinical effects of total artificial hip replacement and cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2018,31(2):103~110
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com