Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
两种止血材料在颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术中的止血效果观察
Hits: 2225   Download times: 553   Received:March 20, 2017    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
李广州 LI Guang-zhou 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
洪瑛 HONG Ying 四川大学华西医院手术室, 四川 成都 610041 Department of Operation, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China hongyin518@163.com 
刘浩 LIU Hao 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
马立泰 MA Li-tai 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
杨毅 YANG Yi 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
丁琛 DING Chen 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
王贝宇 WANG Bei-yu 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
陈华 CHEN Hua 四川大学华西医院骨科, 四川 成都 610041  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2017年30卷,第9期,第849-852页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.09.013


目的:比较可吸收止血流体明胶(HFG)和可吸收明胶海绵(GS)在颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术中的止血效果。

方法:回顾性分析2014年2月至2016年5月接受颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗的患者83例,根据患者术中使用不同止血材料分两组:HFG组41例,男30例,女11例;年龄29~81岁,平均(55.6±11.6)岁;其中14例为单纯颈椎管狭窄症,9例合并后纵韧带骨化,18例合并多节段颈椎间盘突出。GS组42例,男32例,女10例;年龄36~78岁,平均(55.4±11.1)岁;其中12例为单纯颈椎管狭窄症,10例合并后纵韧带骨化,20例合并多节段颈椎间盘突出。两组患者性别、年龄及病变类型等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后不良事件及术后并发症。

结果:HFG组和GS组患者手术时间分别为(137.2±30.0)、(154.8±33.5)min(P<0.05);术中出血量分别为(156.1±74.6)、(242.9±120.7)ml(P<0.001);术后引流量分别为(212.1±67.6)、(303.3±115.5)ml(P<0.001).HFG组手术时间、术中出血量及术后引流量均少于GS组。两组患者均未发生术后切口急性血肿及其他止血相关并发症。

结论:颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术中,HFG操作简单,可以减少手术时间、术中出血量和术后引流量,是一种安全并且效果优于传统止血方式的止血材料。
[关键词]:可吸收止血流体明胶  可吸收明胶海绵  颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术  止血
 
Analysis of clinical effects of absorbable hemostatic fluid gelatin and absorbable gelatin sponge on the hemostasis during operation of unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the hemostatic effect between absorbable hemostatic fluid gelatin (HFG) and absorbable gelatin sponge(GS) during operation of unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty.

Methods: The clinical data of 83 patients underwent unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty from February 2014 to May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the used hemostatic materials,patients were divided into two groups. In HFG group,there were 30 males and 11 females,ranging in age from 29 to 81 years,with an average of(55.6±11.6)years;14 cases were simple cervical spinal stenosis,9 were cervical spinal stenosis and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament,and 18 were cervical spinal stenosis complicated with multiple cervical disc herniation. And in GS group,there were 32 males and 10 females,ranging in age from 36 to 78 years,with an average of (55.4±11.1) years;12 cases were simple cervical spinal stenosis,10 were cervical spinal stenosis complicated with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament,and 20 were cervical spinal stenosis complicated with multiple cervical disc herniation. There was no significant difference in the age,gender,and disease categories of patients between two groups (P>0.05). The operative time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative drainage,and postoperative complications were compared between two groups.

Results: The average operative time,intraoperative bleeding,and postoperative drainage in HFG group were(137.2±30.0) min,(156.1±74.6) ml,and (212.1±67.6) ml,respectively;and in GS group were (154.8±33.5) min,(242.9±120.7) ml,and(303.3±115.5) ml,respectively. There were significantly differences in above items between two groups(P<0.05). No acute heamatoma or related complications was found postoperatively.

Conclusion: Compared with GS,HFG can obviously decrease operative time,intraoperative bleeding,and postoperative drainage. It is a safe and effective hemostatic material for the operation of unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty.
KEYWORDS:Absorbable hemostatic fluid gelatin  Absorbable gelatin sponge  Unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty  Hemostasis
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:李广州,洪瑛,刘浩,马立泰,杨毅,丁琛,王贝宇,陈华.两种止血材料在颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术中的止血效果观察[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(9):849~852
英文格式:LI Guang-zhou,HONG Ying,LIU Hao,MA Li-tai,YANG Yi,DING Chen,WANG Bei-yu,CHEN Hua.Analysis of clinical effects of absorbable hemostatic fluid gelatin and absorbable gelatin sponge on the hemostasis during operation of unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2017,30(9):849~852
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com