Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
单侧经皮关节突椎弓根螺钉联合对侧钉棒固定与双侧钉棒固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较
Hits: 2148   Download times: 526   Received:November 22, 2016    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
邵荣学 SHAO Rong-xue 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China shaorongxue@163.com 
周辉 ZHOU Hui 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
潘浩 PAN Hao 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
乐军 YUE Jun 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
陈惠国 CHEN Hui-guo 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
杨贺杰 YANG He-jie 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
贾高永 JIA Gao-yong 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
王栋 WANG Dong 杭州市中医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310007 Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China  
林焱 LIN Yan 温州医科大学附属第二医院, 浙江 温州 325027  
徐华梓 XU Hua-zi 温州医科大学附属第二医院, 浙江 温州 325027  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2017年30卷,第9期,第817-822页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.09.007


目的:比较单侧经皮关节突椎弓根螺钉联合对侧钉棒固定与双侧钉棒系统固定治疗下腰椎退行性疾病的疗效。

方法:2009年1月至2012年6月,收治46例下腰椎退变性疾病患者,男30例,女16例;年龄32~71岁,平均51.5岁;单节段40例,双节段6例。按固定方式不同分成两组:其中采取单侧经皮关节突椎弓根螺钉联合对侧钉棒固定治疗22例(A组),采用双侧钉棒系统固定治疗24例(B组).比较两种术式术中失血量、手术时间等情况,同时对手术前后腰椎Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分进行比较,评估患者的症状缓解情况。

结果:所有患者获得随访,时间1~3年,平均22个月。两组中各有1例不能明确外,其余均获得骨性融合,未出现内植物移位或断裂等并发症;手术时间和出血量A组优于B组(P<0.05);两组患者ODI评分及JOA评分较术前均得到明显改善(P<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).

结论:对无严重不稳的下腰椎退变性疾病患者,两种内固定方法的效果相似,同时单侧经皮关节突椎弓根螺钉联合对侧钉棒固定术具有创伤小、手术时间短、术中失血量少等优点,是一种安全、可行的手术方法。
[关键词]:腰椎退变性疾病  外科手术  关节突螺钉  椎弓根螺钉  内固定
 
Clinical efficacy of unilateral percutaneous transfacet screws combined with contralateral pedicle screw versus bilateral pedicle screws fixation in the treatment of the degenerative lumbar disease
Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the surgical outcome of unilateral pedicle screw(UPS) after TLIF technique combined with contralateral percutaneous transfacet screw(PTS) fixation vs bilateral pedicle screws(BPS) fixation in treatment of degenerative lumbar disease.

Methods: From January 2009 to June 2012,46 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases,including 30 males and 16 females with an average age of 51.5 years old,who were divided into two groups according to different fixation methods. Twenty-two cases underwent UPS after TLIF technique combined with contralateral PTS fixation (group A),while the others underwent BPS fixation(group B). The relative data were analyzed,such as blood loss volume,operative time,fusion rate,ODI score,JOA score and so on.

Results: All the patients were followed up for 1 to 3 years with an average of 22 months. Except one case of each group was uncertainty fusion,the rest have obtained bony fusion,and the fusion rates in group A and B were 95.5% and 95.8%,respectively. No displacement and breakage of screw were found during follow-up. Operative time and blood loss volume in group A were better than of group B(P<0.05). ODI and JOA scores had improved obviously than preoperation(P<0.05),but the differences had no statistical significance between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclution: Two approaches had similar clinical outcomes for degenerative lumbar disease with no severe instability. Compared with BPS fixation,the UPS after TLIF technique and contralateral PTS fixation has the advantages of less trauma,shorter operative time and less blood loss,and it is a safe and feasible surgical technique.
KEYWORDS:Degenerative lumbar diseases  Surgical procedures,operative  Transfacet screw  Pedicle screw  Internal fixation
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:邵荣学,周辉,潘浩,乐军,陈惠国,杨贺杰,贾高永,王栋,林焱,徐华梓.单侧经皮关节突椎弓根螺钉联合对侧钉棒固定与双侧钉棒固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(9):817~822
英文格式:SHAO Rong-xue,ZHOU Hui,PAN Hao,YUE Jun,CHEN Hui-guo,YANG He-jie,JIA Gao-yong,WANG Dong,LIN Yan,XU Hua-zi.Clinical efficacy of unilateral percutaneous transfacet screws combined with contralateral pedicle screw versus bilateral pedicle screws fixation in the treatment of the degenerative lumbar disease[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2017,30(9):817~822
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com