Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
锁扣带袢钛板与传统螺钉治疗踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤疗效比较
Hits: 2551   Download times: 1611   Received:January 07, 2017    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
叶永志 YE Yong-zhi 台州市中西医结合医院骨科, 浙江 温岭 317500 Department of Orthopaedics, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Taizhou, Wenling 317500, Zhejiang, China 173343662@qq.com 
张隆英 ZHANG Long-ying 台州市中西医结合医院骨科, 浙江 温岭 317500 Department of Orthopaedics, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Taizhou, Wenling 317500, Zhejiang, China  
陈榆 CHEN Yu 台州市中西医结合医院骨科, 浙江 温岭 317500 Department of Orthopaedics, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Taizhou, Wenling 317500, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2017年30卷,第5期,第441-445页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.05.010


目的:比较锁扣带袢钛板与传统螺钉治疗踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤的临床效果。

方法:对2014年5月至2016年2月采用锁扣带袢钛板重建和传统螺钉固定治疗的68例踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方法分为锁扣带袢钛板组和传统螺钉组,锁扣带袢钛板组33例采用锁扣带袢钛板重建下胫腓联合,其中男18例,女15例;年龄20~55岁,平均(32.4±5.2)岁;Lauge-Hansen 分型为旋前外旋Ⅲ度12例,Ⅳ度21例。传统螺钉组35例采用传统螺钉固定下胫腓联合治疗,其中男19例,女16例;年龄21~54岁,平均(32.8±5.5)岁;Lauge-Hansen 分型为旋前外旋Ⅲ度13例,Ⅳ度21例,旋前外展1例。观察并比较两组患者手术复位固定下胫腓联合的时间、并发症情况,并于术后3、6个月及末次随访采用AOFAS评分进行功能评价。

结果:所有病例获得随访,时间8~24个月,平均(16.3±3.8)个月。下胫腓联合固定时间锁扣带袢钛板组(10.1±2.8)min,传统螺钉组(9.5±2.3)min,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者并发症比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组患者术后3、6个月AOFAS评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).末次随访锁扣带袢钛板组优23例,良9例,中1例;传统螺钉组优18例,良12例,中5例;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).

结论:锁扣带袢钛板治疗下胫腓联合韧带损伤,操作方便,可早期负重锻炼而无断钉风险,为治疗踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤提供了新的选择。但仍需进一步研究总结纽扣钢板置入的角度、方向及张力的调节。
[关键词]:踝损伤  下胫腓联合损伤  骨折固定术,内
 
Clinical outcomes Tight rope versus traditional screw fixation for the treatment of injury of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fracture
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness for Tight rope fixation and traditional screw fixation in treating injury of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures.

Methods: A retrospective study was carried out in patients with injury of distal syndesmosis in ankle fractures who received 2 surgical operations(observation group:33 cases with Tight rope fixation;control group:35 cases with traditional screw fixation) from May 2014 to February 2016. There were 18 males and 15 females,aged from 20 to 55 years old with an average of(32.4±5.2) years old in observation group;of them,19 cases were caused by traffic accidents,10 by sprain,and 4 by falling; according to Lauge-Hansen typing of ankle fractures,all of the 33 cases were pronation-extorsion fracture,12 cases were Ⅲ degree and 21 cases were Ⅳ degree. There were 19 males and 16 females,aged from 21 to 54 years old with an average of (32.8±5.5) years old in control group;of them,20 cases were caused by traffic accidents,11 by sprain,4 by falling;according to Lauge-Hansen typing of ankle fractures,1 case was with pronation-outreach,34 cases with pronation-extorsion,13 cases were Ⅲ degree and 21 cases were Ⅳ degree. Fixation time and complication were compared between two groups and AOFAS scores were observed in two groups 3 and 6 months after the operation as well as final follow-up.

Results: All the patients were followed up from 8 to 24 months with an average of (16.3±3.8) months. Fixation time of observation group and control group were (10.1±2.8) min and (9.5±2.3) min(P>0.05) respectively. There were significant difference in complication and AOFAS of 3,6 months postoperatively between two groups(P<0.05). In observation group,23 case got excellent result,9 good,1 fair;and in control group,18 cases got excellent results,12 good,5 fair;there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion: Tight rope for the treatment of injury of distal tibiofibular ligament union in ankle fractures has advantages such as easier techniques,earlier weight-bearing exercises without risk of screw breakage,thus is a new choice. However,it is still necessary to further study the angle,direction and tension of button steel plate.
KEYWORDS:Ankle injuries  Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries  Fracture fixation,internal
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:叶永志,张隆英,陈榆.锁扣带袢钛板与传统螺钉治疗踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(5):441~445
英文格式:YE Yong-zhi,ZHANG Long-ying,CHEN Yu.Clinical outcomes Tight rope versus traditional screw fixation for the treatment of injury of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2017,30(5):441~445
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com