Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
多模式镇痛与静脉自控镇痛对类风湿关节炎全膝关节置换术围手术期镇痛效果的病例对照研究
Hits: 2104   Download times: 1122   Received:December 02, 2016    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
高华利 GAO Hua-li 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China  
肖涟波 XIAO Lian-bo 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China 13701888178@163.com 
翟伟韬 ZHAI Wei-tao 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China  
何勇 HE Yong 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China  
朱飞 ZHU Fei 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China  
郑林 ZHENG Lin 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China  
韩秀伟 HAN Xiu-wei 上海市光华中西医结合医院关节矫形外科, 上海 200052 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Guanghua Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200052, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2017年30卷,第4期,第356-359页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.04.015
基金项目:上海市长宁区卫计委课题(编号:20144Y008);上海中医药大学后备业务专家(培育)项目(编号:2005005)


目的:比较多模式镇痛与静脉自控镇痛对类风湿关节炎患者全膝关节置换围手术期的镇痛效果。

方法:自2015年6月至2016年6月对40例类风湿关节炎患者行单侧全膝关节置换术治疗,分为2组。静脉自控镇痛组20例,男3例,女17例,平均年龄(59.6±2.3)岁;多模式镇痛组20例,男2例,女18例,平均年龄(56.3±1.3)岁。静脉自控镇痛组采用静脉镇痛泵控制性滴入舒芬太尼镇痛,多模式镇痛组采用连续股神经阻滞、膝关节局部注射及丁丙诺啡贴剂联合镇痛方案,比较两组患者全膝关节置换术后48 h内VAS评分及不良反应发生率,术后1周HSS评分,评价两种镇痛模式的优劣。

结果:术后6、24 h,多模式镇痛组患者VAS评分低于静脉自控镇痛组;术后48 h在运动和静止状态下,多模式镇痛组患者VAS评分均低于静脉自控镇痛组。术后1周多模式镇痛组HSS评分高于静脉自控镇痛组,HSS评分中的功能、疼痛及活动度评分,多模式镇痛组优于静脉自控镇痛组,但肌力评分两组差异无统计学意义。

结论:多模式镇痛效果好,不良反应少,是类风湿关节炎患者全膝关节置换围手术期理想的镇痛方案。
[关键词]:关节炎,类风湿  关节成形术,置换,膝  镇痛  围手术期  病例对照研究
 
Comparison of analgesic effects between multimodal and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the perioperative period of total knee arthroplasty
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the analgesic effect between multimodal and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA) in the perioperative period of knee joint replacement.

Methods: From June 2015 to June 2016,40 RA patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly divided into two groups. There were 20 patients in PCIA group,including 3 males and 17 females,with an average age of(59.6±2.3) years old,who received controlled instillation of sufentanil analgesia controlled by an intravenous analgesia pump. There were 20 patients in multiple model analgesia group,including 2 males and 18 females,with an average age of(56.3±1.3) years old,who were treated with continuous femoral nerve block,local injection of knee joint and combined buprenorphine patches. The VAS score and the incidence of adverse reactions and HSS score were compared between the two groups after operation. The advantages and disadvantages of the two modes of analgesia were evaluated.

Results: On the 6 th and 24 th hours after surgery,the VAS scores of the multimodal analgesia group were significantly lower than those of the PCIA group(P<0.01). On the 48 th hour after surgery,the VAS scores was significantly lower in the multimodal analgesia group than those in PCIA group(P<0.000 1),both in the state of motion and at rest. On the 1 st week after surgery,the HSS score of the multimodal analgesia group was significantly higher than that in the PCIA group(P<0.000 1). The pain score and the degree of activity in HSS score of the multimodal analgesia group were better than those in PCIA group (P<0.05). The functional score of multimodal analgesia group was significantly better than that of PCIA group(P<0.01). But there was no significant difference in muscle strength scores between two groups.

Conclusion: Multimodal analgesia is an ideal analgesic plan for total knee arthroplasty TKA patients with RA in perioperative period,which has good effects and little adverse reaction.
KEYWORDS:Arthritis, rheumatoid  Arthroplasty, replacement, knee  Analgesia  Perioperative period  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:高华利,肖涟波,翟伟韬,何勇,朱飞,郑林,韩秀伟.多模式镇痛与静脉自控镇痛对类风湿关节炎全膝关节置换术围手术期镇痛效果的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(4):356~359
英文格式:GAO Hua-li,XIAO Lian-bo,ZHAI Wei-tao,HE Yong,ZHU Fei,ZHENG Lin,HAN Xiu-wei.Comparison of analgesic effects between multimodal and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the perioperative period of total knee arthroplasty[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2017,30(4):356~359
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com