Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
关节镜下清创治疗人工膝关节置换术后早期感染的临床分析
Hits: 2005   Download times: 1183   Received:January 24, 2017    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
宋海波 SONG Hai-bo 海宁市中医院, 浙江 海宁 314400 The TCM Hospital of Haining, Haining 314400, Zhejiang, China heble198567@163.com 
陈洁 CHEN Jie 海宁市中医院, 浙江 海宁 314400 The TCM Hospital of Haining, Haining 314400, Zhejiang, China  
刘宏 LIU Hong 浙江省立同德医院, 浙江 杭州 310006  
周昭辉 ZHOU Zhao-hui 湖南省中医院, 湖南 长沙 410007  
王剑锋 WANG Jian-feng 海宁市中医院, 浙江 海宁 314400 The TCM Hospital of Haining, Haining 314400, Zhejiang, China  
顾豪杰 GU Hao-jie 海宁市中医院, 浙江 海宁 314400 The TCM Hospital of Haining, Haining 314400, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2017年30卷,第4期,第318-321页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.04.007


目的:对比分析关节镜和常规开放清创治疗人工膝关节置换术后早期感染的临床疗效。

方法:回顾性研究2009年10月至2016年9月3家医院收治的膝关节置换术后早期感染的患者11例11膝,术前穿刺抽取关节液行细菌培养及药物敏感试验,分为2组,其中关节镜组5例,关节镜下行清创术;常规组6例,行常规开放清创术。术后两组敏感抗生素持续闭式灌注2~3周,待冲洗液变清后3~5 d拔管,术中记录手术时间、出血量、切口长度。于术后第1、3、7天利用疼痛标尺评分记录患者伤肢疼痛情况,根据美国特种外科医院(the Hospital for Special Surgery,HSS)膝关节评分评价术后疗效。

结果:11例经治疗后局部及全身症状体征消失,血液及关节液检查结果均正常。术后随访6~18个月,关节镜组1例、常规组2例术后3个月感染复发,经再次关节镜清创手术后感染得以控制。随访终末根据HSS膝关节评分进行疗效评定,关节镜组优3例,良2例,中0例,差0例;常规组优3例,良1例,中1例,差1例。

结论:对人工膝关节置换术后早期感染中没有明显骨质感染、破坏,关节周围皮肤没有窦道形成,假体无松动且能找到敏感抗生素的患者,应用关节镜手术后持续灌洗、敏感抗生素应用可以获得较好的疗效,是一种创伤小、疗效较好的方法。
[关键词]:关节镜  关节成形术,置换,膝  手术后并发症  感染
 
Clinical analysis on arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of early infection after total knee replacement
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical effects of arthroscopic debridement versus open debridement on controlling and treatment of infection after total knee replacement.

Methods: From October 2009 to September 2016 in three hospitals,11 patients with 11 joints which were infected after total knee replacement were randomly divided into two groups:5 cases in arthroscopy group and 6 cases in routine group. Patients in arthroscopy group were treated with arthroscopic debridement to remove the necrotic tissues,then closed-type irrigation with sensitive antibiotics by using two sebific ducts were performed continuously for 2 or 3 weeks until the flushing fluid became clear for 3 or 5 days;other 6 patients in routine group were treated with open surgical debridement and the following procedures in keeping with those in the arthroscopy group. Operation time,blood loss and incision length were recorded during the operation,and pain scores were recorded on the 1st,3rd and 7th day after the operation. The curative effects were evaluated according to the Hospital for Special Surgery score system.

Results: The local and general symptoms of the 11 patients disappeared,and the test outcomes of biochemistry,blood and synovial fluid were normal. All patients were followed up,and the duration ranged from 6 to 18 months. Infection recurrences were observed in 1 case of arthroscopy group and 2 cases of routine group 3 months later after operation,and all these patients who underwent the second time operation with arthroscopic debridement were cured. According to the Hospital for Special Surgery score system,3 cases obtained excellent result,2 good,no poor and bad cases in arthroscopy group;3 cases obtained excellent result,1 good,1 poor and 1 bad in routine group.

Conclusion: If the sensitive antibiotics can be found for the infected joints without obvious destruction of bone and no prosthesis loosening,it has a better therapeutic effect by using arthroscopic debridement combined with continuous drainage and irrigation. The method has a better curative effect with smaller trauma.
KEYWORDS:Arthroscopes  Arthroplasty, replacement, knee  Postoperative complications  Infection
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:宋海波,陈洁,刘宏,周昭辉,王剑锋,顾豪杰.关节镜下清创治疗人工膝关节置换术后早期感染的临床分析[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(4):318~321
英文格式:SONG Hai-bo,CHEN Jie,LIU Hong,ZHOU Zhao-hui,WANG Jian-feng,GU Hao-jie.Clinical analysis on arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of early infection after total knee replacement[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2017,30(4):318~321
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com