Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
漂浮肩不同治疗方式的疗效评价
Hits: 1689   Download times: 372   Received:April 15, 2016    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
周青 ZHOU Qing 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China kingzq86@163.com 
李坤 LI Kun 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China  
陈波 CHEN Bo 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China  
周耀东 ZHOU Yao-dong 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China  
陈豪 CHEN Hao 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China  
王振 WANG Zhen 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China  
刘进炼 LIU Jin-lian 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科, 江苏 苏州 215021 Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloom Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2016年29卷,第9期,第847-852页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.09.015


目的:探讨采用非手术治疗、手术固定锁骨、手术固定锁骨和肩胛骨3种不同方式治疗漂浮肩的临床疗效。

方法:对2006年2月至2014年8月56例采用3种不同方式治疗漂浮肩患者的临床疗效行回顾性分析:其中A组12例,男7例,女5例,平均年龄(45.08±13.47)岁,均采用非手术治疗法;B组29例,男18例,女11例,平均年龄(37.28±10.43)岁,均采用手术治疗单独固定锁骨法;C组15例,男11例,女4例,平均年龄(36.20±9.50)岁,均采用手术治疗固定锁骨和肩胛骨法。分别采用Herscovici标准和Constant-Murley肩关节评分对3种不同方式治疗后的肩关节功能进行评分,并对3组患者术后的临床疗效进行分析。

结果:B组患者的手术时间、术中出血量均少于C组(P=0.000)。分别采用Herscovici标准和Constant-Murley肩关节评分比较3种方式治疗漂浮肩患者的临床疗效,A组与B组、A组与C组的临床疗效差异有统计学意义(P=0.000),B组与C组的临床疗效差异无统计学意义。

结论:手术治疗对漂浮肩损伤患者的肩关节功能恢复有明显优势,且单独固定锁骨风险更低。
[关键词]:肩胛骨  锁骨  骨折  肩关节
 
Comparative study on curative effects of different methods for the treatment of the“floating shoulder injuries”
Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the clinical curative effects of different methods for the treatment of"floating shoulder injuries".

Methods: A total of 56 patients with "floating shoulder injuries" from February 2006 to August 2014 were enrolled in the study,including 12 patients[7 males and 5 females with an average age of(45.08±13.47)years old]treated by non-operation (group A),29 patients[18 males and 11 females with an average age of(37.28±10.43) years old]treated by internal plate fixation of the fracture of the clavicle(group B),15 patients(11 males,4 females; average age of 36.20±9.50 years) treated by internal plate fixation of the fracture of the clavicle and the scapular(group C). Functional outcomes of injured shoulder joints were assessed using Herscovici and Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score.

Results: There was a significant difference on operative time and intra-operative blood loss between group B and group C(P=0.000). There were significant differences of functional outcomes among three groups(P=0.000). The shoulder joint function of group A and group B,group A and group C were significantly different(P=0.000),while there was no significant difference between Group B and Group C.

Conclusion: Operation treatment for"floating shoulder injuries"has obvious advantages for the functional recovery of shoulder joint,and the risk for the single fixation treatment of clavicle is lower.
KEYWORDS:Scapula  Clavicle  Fractures  Shoulder joint
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:周青,李坤,陈波,周耀东,陈豪,王振,刘进炼.漂浮肩不同治疗方式的疗效评价[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(9):847~852
英文格式:ZHOU Qing,LI Kun,CHEN Bo,ZHOU Yao-dong,CHEN Hao,WANG Zhen,LIU Jin-lian.Comparative study on curative effects of different methods for the treatment of the“floating shoulder injuries”[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2016,29(9):847~852
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com