Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
小切口经肌间隙与微创经皮入路治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床对比研究
Hits: 2073   Download times: 1166   Received:April 10, 2015    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
程杭清 CHENG Hang-qing 宁波大学医学院, 浙江 宁波 315040  
李国庆 LI Guo-qing 宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China lgqgz0323@163.com 
孙韶华 SUN Shao-hua 宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
马维虎 MA Wei-hu 宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
阮超越 RUAN Chao-yue 宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
赵华国 ZHAO Hua-guo 宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
徐荣明 XU Rong-ming 宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江 宁波 315040 Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2015年28卷,第11期,第1008-1012页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2015.11.007


目的:比较小切口经肌间隙与微创经皮入路椎弓根钉短节段跨伤椎固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的优缺点及疗效。

方法:2009年8月至2012年8月,采用小切口经肌间隙入路或微创经皮入路椎弓根钉短节段跨伤椎固定技术治疗并获得1年以上随访的无神经损伤症状的胸腰椎骨折患者95例,男65例,女30例;年龄16~60岁,平均42岁。小切口经肌间隙入路固定58例(经肌间隙组),微创经皮入路固定37例(微创经皮组).对两种不同入路的手术切口总长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视时间、住院期间费用等围手术期指标,以及手术前后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和影像学结果等指标进行比较分析。

结果:所有患者获得随访,平均随访时间19.6个月。未发现切口感染、椎弓根螺钉内固定松动断裂等并发症。经肌间隙组较微创经皮组术中透视时间短、住院期间费用低(p<0.05);而微创经皮组较经肌间隙组切口总长度小(p<0.05);但在手术时间、术中出血量、术后VAS及术后影像学结果方面两者比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05).术后VAS及影像学指标均较术前改善(p<0.05).

结论:小切口经肌间隙入路与微创经皮入路椎弓根钉治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折具有相似的疗效。小切口经肌间隙入路易于学习掌握,无须增加患者手术费用和遭受过多的医源性辐射,建议优先考虑使用。
[关键词]:脊柱骨折  骨折固定术,内  手术入路  外科手术,微创性
 
Mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular versus percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fractures
Abstract:

Objective:To compare the clinical effects and radiographic outcomes of mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation in treating thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fractures without neurological deficits.

Methods:From August 2009 and August 2012,95 patients with thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fractures without neurological deficits were treated with short-segment pedicle fixation through mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular or percutaneous approach. There were 65 males and 30 females,aged from 16 to 60 years old with an average of 42 years. The mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular approach was used in 58 cases (group A) and the percutaneous approach was used in 37 cases (group B). Total incision length,operative time,intraoperative bleeding,fluoroscopy,hospitalization cost were compared between two groups. Visual analog scale (VAS) and radiographic outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results:All patients were followed up from 12 to 36 months with an average of 19.6 months. No complications such as incision infection,internal fixation loosening and breakage were found. In group A,fluoroscopy time was short and hospitalization cost was lower than that of group B(p<0.05). But the total incision length in group B was smaller than that of group A(p<0.05). There was no significant differences in operative time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative VAS and radiographic outcomes between two groups(p>0.05). Postoperative VAS and radiographic outcomes were improved than that of preoperative(p<0.05).

Conclusion:The mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation have similar clinical effects and radiographic outcomes in treating thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fractures without neurological deficits. However,in this study,the mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular approach has a short learning curve and more advantages in hospitalization cost and intraoperative radiation exposure times,and is recommendable.
KEYWORDS:Spinal fractures  Fracture fixation, internal  Operative approach  Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:程杭清,李国庆,孙韶华,马维虎,阮超越,赵华国,徐荣明.小切口经肌间隙与微创经皮入路治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床对比研究[J].中国骨伤,2015,28(11):1008~1012
英文格式:CHENG Hang-qing,LI Guo-qing,SUN Shao-hua,MA Wei-hu,RUAN Chao-yue,ZHAO Hua-guo,XU Rong-ming.Mini-open trans-spatium intermuscular versus percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2015,28(11):1008~1012
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com