Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
带旋髂深血管髂骨瓣和股方肌骨瓣移植治疗青壮年GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折的比较
Hits: 2069   Download times: 1123   Received:November 20, 2014    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张学全 ZHANG Xue-quan 河源市中医院创伤骨科 河源市创伤救治中心, 广东 河源 517000 Department of Orthopaedics, Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heyuan Trauma center, Heyuan 517000, Guangdong, China jpzxq@126.com 
樊仕才 FAN Shi-cai 南方医科大学第三附属医院骨科中心 广东省骨科研究院, 广东 广州 510630  
黎惠金 LI Hui-jin 河源市中医院创伤骨科 河源市创伤救治中心, 广东 河源 517000 Department of Orthopaedics, Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heyuan Trauma center, Heyuan 517000, Guangdong, China  
谢延华 XIE Yan-hua 河源市中医院创伤骨科 河源市创伤救治中心, 广东 河源 517000 Department of Orthopaedics, Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heyuan Trauma center, Heyuan 517000, Guangdong, China  
罗鹏刚 LUO Peng-gang 广东医学院附属高明医院骨科, 广东 佛山 528500  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2015年28卷,第9期,第802-807页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2015.09.006


目的:对比髋关节前侧S-P入路联合带旋髂深血管髂骨瓣植骨及后侧K-L入路联合带股方肌骨瓣植骨治疗青壮年股骨颈GardenⅢ/Ⅳ型骨折的疗效差异.

方法:2004年1月至2011年1月收治46 例青壮年GardenⅢ/Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折患者,其中20例采用前侧S-P入路联合带旋髂深血管髂骨瓣植骨(S-P组),男12例,女8例,年龄(32.1±7.3)岁,骨折GardenⅢ型12例,Ⅳ型8例;26例采用髋关节后侧K-L入路联合应用带股方肌骨瓣植骨(K-L组),男20例,女6例,年龄(37.8±6.9)岁,GardenⅢ型16例,Ⅳ型10例.观察比较两组患者住院观察指标(住院时间、住院总费用、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症)、手术质量指标(骨折复位质量、内固定置入质量、骨折愈合时间、骨折不愈合、股骨头缺血性坏死)以及髋关节功能Harris评分.

结果:46例患者术后获得随访,时间28~41个月,平均32个月.患者术中出血量:S-P组为(92.3±10.4) ml,K-L组为(132.4±11.2) ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术时间:S-P组为(81.4±9.2) min,K-L组为(67.1±4.5) min,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后S-P组有1例患者出现内科并发症,而K-L组有9例;在骨折愈合时间上,S-P组(83.5±7.3) d,K-L组(103.2±12.6) d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后30个月两组Harris 评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).

结论:采用髋关节前侧S-P入路治疗青壮年Ⅲ/Ⅳ股骨颈骨折,具有解剖清晰、操作便利的特点,与后侧K-L入路相比较,该入路能较好的保留股骨颈残留血供,联合带旋髂深血管髂骨瓣植骨能较好重建股骨颈血供,利于骨折愈合.
[关键词]:股骨颈骨折  骨折固定术,内  外科手术
 
Case-control study on the iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery and quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation for the treatment of Garden Ⅲ/Ⅳ femoral neck fracture of young and middle-aged patients
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical effects between hip anterior S-P approach combined with iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery and posterior K-L approach combined with quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture of Garden Ⅲ-Ⅳ in young and middle-aged patients.

Methods: From January 2004 to January 2011, 46 patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by two kinds of operation. Among them, 20 cases were treated with anterior S-P approach combined with iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery, included 12 males and 8 females with an average age of (32.1±7.3) years old, involved 12 cases of Garden Ⅲ and 8 cases of Garden Ⅳ. The other 26 cases were treated with posterior K-L approach combined with quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation, included 20 males and 6 females with an average age of (37.8±6.9) years old, involved 16 cases of Garden Ⅲand 10 cases of Garden Ⅳ. The index of hospitalization (hospitalization time, total cost, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications), the quality index of operation (fracture reduction, position of internal fixation, fracture healing time, nonunion and femoral head necrosis) of two groups were observed and compared. Hip joint function were evaluated by Harris score.

Results: All patients were followed up from 28 to 41 months with an average of 36 months. The intraoperative blood loss of group S-P (92.3±10.4) ml was less than that of group K-L (132.4±11.2) ml, there was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). The operation time of group S-P (81.4±9.2) min was more than that of group K-L (67.1±4.5) min, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). One case in group S-P and 9 cases in group K-L appeared postoperative complications, there was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). The fracture healing time of S-P group (83.5±7.3) d was shorter than that of group K-L (103.2±12.6) d, there was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). At 30 months after operation, there were significant difference in Harris scoring between two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Anterior S-P approach combined with iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery for treatment of femoral neck fracture of Garden Ⅲ-Ⅳ of young and middle-aged patients, it has characteristics in clear anatomic and easy to operate. As compared with K-L approach, S-P approach can better reserve residual blood supply of femoral neck. While combining with the iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery, it could better reconstruct the blood supply of femoral neck to promote fracture healing.
KEYWORDS:Femoral neck fractures  Fracture fixation, internal  Surgical procedures, operative
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张学全,樊仕才,黎惠金,谢延华,罗鹏刚.带旋髂深血管髂骨瓣和股方肌骨瓣移植治疗青壮年GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折的比较[J].中国骨伤,2015,28(9):802~807
英文格式:ZHANG Xue-quan,FAN Shi-cai,LI Hui-jin,XIE Yan-hua,LUO Peng-gang.Case-control study on the iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery and quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation for the treatment of Garden Ⅲ/Ⅳ femoral neck fracture of young and middle-aged patients[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2015,28(9):802~807
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com