Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
椎弓根固定结合经椎间孔椎间融合治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症伴腰椎不稳
Hits: 2524   Download times: 1238   Received:December 11, 2013    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
潘兵 PAN Bing 解放军第117医院骨二科, 浙江 杭州 310013 The 2nd Department of Orthopaedics, the 117th Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang, China minghaifashi@163.com 
符楚迪 FU Chu-di 解放军第117医院骨二科, 浙江 杭州 310013 The 2nd Department of Orthopaedics, the 117th Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang, China  
葛云林 GE Yun-lin 解放军第117医院骨二科, 浙江 杭州 310013 The 2nd Department of Orthopaedics, the 117th Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang, China  
李战友 LI Zhan-you 解放军第117医院骨二科, 浙江 杭州 310013 The 2nd Department of Orthopaedics, the 117th Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang, China  
张志敬 ZHANG Zhi-jing 解放军第117医院骨二科, 浙江 杭州 310013 The 2nd Department of Orthopaedics, the 117th Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang, China  
刘海明 LIU Hai-ming 浙江中医药大学第二临床医学院, 浙江 杭州 310053  
杨刚 YANG Gang 浙江中医药大学第二临床医学院, 浙江 杭州 310053  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2014年27卷,第9期,第712-716页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2014.09.002


目的:探讨经肌间隙入路椎弓根固定结合经椎间孔椎间融合(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症伴腰椎不稳的临床疗效。

方法:2008年3月至2010年5月收治35例复发性腰椎间盘突出症,其中15例行经肌间隙入路单边椎弓根固定结合TLIF术式(单边固定组),20例行后正中入路双边椎弓根固定结合后路椎间植骨融合(posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF)术式(双边固定组).观察手术时间、术中出血量,并比较手术前后两组患者JOA评分、腰痛及腿痛VAS评分及融合情况。

结果:所有患者获得随访,时间6~30个月,平均16.8个月。两组患者腰腿痛等临床症状较术前明显缓解,X线片显示植骨融合良好(双边固定组中1例未融合),无融合器移位、下沉及内固定器械松动或断裂。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后JOA评分均较术前降低(P<0.05).术后1周,两组患者腰痛VAS评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),腿痛VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);末次随访,腰痛及腿痛VAS评分两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).

结论:两种术式在治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症伴腰椎不稳均可达到满意的疗效,经肌间隙入路单边椎弓根固定结合TLIF术式切口较小,手术时间较短,术中出血量较少,术后腰痛缓解较快。
[关键词]:椎间盘移位  复发  腰椎  外科手术  脊柱融合术
 
Unilateral pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through paraspinal muscle approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability
Abstract:

Objective: To explore the clinical effects of unilateral pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) through paraspinal muscle approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability.

Methods: A total of 35 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability were treated between March 2008 and May 2010, including 15 patients managed by the paraspinal muscle approach with unilateral pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (unilateral fixation group) and 20 patients by the posterior midline approach with bilateral pedicle screw fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (bilateral fixation group). Operation time and intraoperative blood loss were observed, preoperative and postoperative JOA score and VAS score in low back pain and legs pain, the interbody fusion condition were compared between two groups.

Results: All patients were followed up from 6 to 30 months with an average 16.8 months. All clinical symptoms had obviously improved postoperatively. X-rays showed good interbody fusion (only 1 case did not obtain fusion in bilateral fixation group) without cage displacement or settlement and implant loosening or breakage. There was significant difference in operation time and the intraoperative blood loss between two groups(P<0.05). Postoperative JOA score had obviously decreased than preoperative one(P<0.05). At 1 week after surgery, there was significant difference in VAS score of low back pain between two groups and there was no significant difference in VAS score of legs pain between two groups(P>0.05);at final follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS score of low back pain and legs pain between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion: Two methods both can obtain satisfactory effect in treating recurrent lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability. Through the paraspinal muscle approach with unilateral pedicle screw fixation and TLIF has advantages of smaller surgical incision, shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, faster relief in low back pain after operation, etc.
KEYWORDS:Intervertebral disk displacement  Recurrence  Lumbar vertebrae  Surgical procedures,operative  Spinal fusion
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:潘兵,符楚迪,葛云林,李战友,张志敬,刘海明,杨刚.椎弓根固定结合经椎间孔椎间融合治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症伴腰椎不稳[J].中国骨伤,2014,27(9):712~716
英文格式:PAN Bing,FU Chu-di,GE Yun-lin,LI Zhan-you,ZHANG Zhi-jing,LIU Hai-ming,YANG Gang.Unilateral pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through paraspinal muscle approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2014,27(9):712~716
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com