| 经皮椎间孔镜下选择性减压治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析 |
|
Hits: 2297
Download times: 1348
Received:November 05, 2013
|
| 作者 | Author | 单位 | Unit | E-Mail |
| 胡德新 |
HU De-xin |
杭州市红十字会医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310003 |
Department of Orthopaedics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China |
huhudexin@163.com |
| 郑琦 |
ZHENG Qi |
杭州市红十字会医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310003 |
Department of Orthopaedics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China |
|
| 朱博 |
ZHU Bo |
杭州市红十字会医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310003 |
Department of Orthopaedics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China |
|
| 应小樟 |
YING Xiao-zhang |
杭州市红十字会医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310003 |
Department of Orthopaedics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China |
|
| 汪翼凡 |
WANG Yi-fan |
杭州市红十字会医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310003 |
Department of Orthopaedics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China |
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2014年27卷，第3期，第194-198页 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2014.03.006 |
|
目的：评价经皮椎间孔镜治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果。
方法：对2006年7月至2011年7月收治的60例老年性腰椎管狭窄症患者进行回顾性分析，其中男32例，女28例；年龄72～83岁，平均（66.7±2.5）岁。根据手术方法不同分为传统手术组和椎间孔镜组，每组30例。记录比较两组患者围手术期观察指标、手术切口VAS评分（术后12、24、48、72 h），采用Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI评分）对两组患者术前，术后6、24个月的日常生活能力进行评定。
结果：在手术时间、术中出血量、术后使用镇痛药物例数和住院时间的比较上，椎间孔镜组明显优于传统手术组（P<0.05）.术后椎间孔镜组切口疼痛程度较传统手术组明显降低（P<0.05）.60例患者均获得至少24个月的随访，两组患者于术后1、24个月时ODI评分均较术前明显改善，但椎间孔镜组患者ODI评分改善明显优于传统手术组患者（P<0.05）.
结论：腰椎经皮椎间孔镜技术在手术切口、术中出血量、住院时间等方面具有微创优越性，对脊柱稳定结构破坏小，患者术后恢复快，是治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症的一种新的有效的微创手术方式。 |
| [关键词]:腰椎 椎管狭窄 老年人 内窥镜 外科手术，微创性 |
| |
| Percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic lumbar discectomy decompression for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome |
|
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic lumbar discectomy for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome.
Methods: From July 2006 to July 2011,60 elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome were treated with surgical operation,including 32 males and 28 females with an average age of(66.7±2.5) years old ranging from 72 to 83 years. These patients were divided into the traditional surgery group and percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic discectomy groups(PTED group),30 cases in each group. The index of the preoperative and postoperative,operative incision visual analogue scale(VAS) of two groups were compared. The Oswestry disability index(ODI) of two groups at 6,24 months of the follow-up were also evaluated on activity of daily living.
Results: The average operative time,the average blood loss,the number of cases using analgesic drug,hospitalization time of PTED group were better than those of the traditional surgery group(P<0.05). The improvement of incision VAS in PTED group was better than that in the traditional surgery group(P<0.05). All patients were followed up for 24 months at least. The ODI at 1,24 month after operation were better than that of preoperative in two group respectively(P<0.05),but the improvement of PTED group was better than that of the traditional surgery group(P<0.05).
Conclusion: PTED has the advantages of smaller incision,less bleeding,less postoperative stay and hospitalization time,tissue trauma and quicker recovery. It is a safe and efficacious minimally invasive surgical technique for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome. |
| KEYWORDS:Lumbar vertebrae Spinal stenosis Aged Endoscopes Surgical procedures,minimally invasive |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 胡德新,郑琦,朱博,应小樟,汪翼凡.经皮椎间孔镜下选择性减压治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2014,27(3):194~198 |
| 英文格式: | HU De-xin,ZHENG Qi,ZHU Bo,YING Xiao-zhang,WANG Yi-fan.Percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic lumbar discectomy decompression for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2014,27(3):194~198 |
|
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
