Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
针刀疗法治疗颈椎病的Meta分析
Hits: 2150   Download times: 301   Received:January 21, 2013    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
阚丽丽 KAN Li-li 甘肃中医学院中医医疗系, 甘肃 兰州 730000 Gansu Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China  
王海东 WANG Hai-dong 甘肃省中医院风湿骨病科, 甘肃 兰州 730050 Whaidong5895@163.com 
刘安国 LIU An-guo 甘肃中医学院中医医疗系, 甘肃 兰州 730000 Gansu Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2013年26卷,第11期,第935-939页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2013.11.014
基金项目:2012年兰州市科技局社会发展计划项目资助(编号:2012-1-45)


目的:对针刀疗法治疗颈椎病的相关随机对照试验文献进行质量评价,并比较其疗效的优越性。

方法:计算机检索2000年至2012年中国知网(CNKI),万方数据库(WF)数据库中有关针刀治疗颈椎病的临床随机对照试验文献。采用Review Manager 5.1软件进行Meta分析评价疗效,比较优越性。

结果:共纳入临床随机对照试验文献13篇,涉及患者共1 419名。纳入的研究方法学质量评价普遍偏低,主要表现在:缺乏大样本、多中心RCT研究;文献随机分组方法不够准确;纳入标准、诊断标准及疗效评价标准类型繁多;仅少数文献对远期疗效进行了评估,大多数文献未提到不良事件的发生及脱落情况;所有研究均未使用盲法。Meta分析结果显示:与针刺疗法比较,合并后效应指标[RR=0.19,95%CI(0.15,0.24),P<0.00001];与牵引疗法比较,合并后效应指标[RR=1.30,95%CI(1.18,1.42),P<0.00001].

结论:针刀疗法与常规针刺疗法比较,针刀治疗颈椎病的疗效优于针刺疗法;与牵引疗法比较,由于样本量较小,发表偏倚明显,针刀疗法相比牵引疗法的优越性还有待于今后大样本的荟萃分析。
[关键词]:颈椎病  针刀疗法  针刺疗法  牵引术  Meta分析
 
Meta-analysis of needle-knife treatment on cervical spondylosis
Abstract:

Objective: To assess the efficacy of cervical spondylosis by needle-knife treatment according to the correlated literature of RCT,to compare advantages of needle-knife treatment.

Methods: Randomized Controlled Trials about needle-knife treatment of cervical spondylosis were indexed from Chinese HowNet(CNKI) and Wanfang(WF) from 2000 to 2012,then were analyzed the efficacy by Review Manager 5.1 software.

Results: A total of 13 RCT literatures and 1 419 patients were included. The methods of included studies were poor in quality evaluation because of large sample and multi-center RCT studies was lacked,randomization method was not accurate enough,diagnostic criteria and efficacy evaluation were various,only four studies described long-term efficacy,most of the literature didn't describe the adverse event and fall off,all studies did not use the blind method. The Meta analysis outcome showed overall efficiency of needle-knife therapy was better than acupuncture and traction. Needle-knife therapy compared with Acupuncture,the total RR=0.19,95% confidence interval was (0.15,0.24),P<0.000 01. Compared with traction therapy the total RR=1.30,95% confidence interval was(1.18,1.42),P<0.000 01.

Conclusion: Compared with acupuncture therapy,the overall effectiveness of needle-knife therapy is higher;compared with traction therapy,although,needle-knife therapy has a high overall effectiveness,but because of the loss of total sample size,the outcome can not be entirely sure. But its superiority of efficacy is need for large sample,muti-centure,accurate method,high quality RCT researches to confirm.
KEYWORDS:Cervical spondylosis  Needle-knife therapy  Acupuncture therapy  Traction  Meta-Analysis
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:阚丽丽,王海东,刘安国.针刀疗法治疗颈椎病的Meta分析[J].中国骨伤,2013,26(11):935~939
英文格式:KAN Li-li,WANG Hai-dong,LIU An-guo.Meta-analysis of needle-knife treatment on cervical spondylosis[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2013,26(11):935~939
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com