Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
网球肘的分型及针刀治疗体会
Hits: 2251   Download times: 1643   Received:March 26, 2013    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
朱胤晟 ZHU Yin-sheng 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院, 浙江 杭州 310053  
姚新苗 YAO Xin-miao 浙江中医药大学附属第三医院, 浙江 杭州 310005 The Third Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang, China yxmtcm@yahoo.com.cn 
吕一 LU Yi 浙江中医药大学附属第三医院, 浙江 杭州 310005 The Third Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2013年26卷,第8期,第659-662页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2013.08.012


目的: 观察对不同分型网球肘运用小针刀给予不同治疗的临床疗效。

方法: 2011年3月至2012年12月共治疗网球肘100例(123肘),男36例,女64例;年龄29~76岁,平均49岁;病史3个月~2年,平均7.2个月。根据患者临床症状和体征将网球肘分为3型:关节外型46例,关节内型34例,关节内外混合型20例。采用针刀根据不同类型分别进行治疗。

结果: 所有患者获随访,时间6~12个月,平均8.2个月,患者症状体征治疗前后比较,差异有统计学意义。根据Verhaar肘关节疗效评估标准,关节外型46例,优35例,良9例,可2例;关节内型34例,优24例,良9例,可1例;混合型20例,优9例,良8例,可3例。

结论: 在临床工作中不能用单一的发病机制来解释网球肘的病因,应将网球肘进行分型,并针对不同的分型给予不同的治疗,从而提高网球肘的治愈率。
[关键词]:针刀  网球肘  分类法  肘关节
 
Small needle-knife for the treatment of tennis elbow according to its classification
Abstract:

Objective: To observe clinical effect of different treatments for tennis elbow with small needle-knife according to its classification.

Methods: From March 2011 to December 2012,100 patients with 123 tennis elbows were treated with small needle-knife,including 36 males and 64 females,ranging in age from 29 to 76 years old (averaged,49 years old). The course of disease ranged from 3 months to 2 years (averaged,7.2 months). According to the classification,46 elbows were with extra-articular type,34 elbows with intra-articular type,20 elbows with mixed type. All the patients were treated with small needle-knife by using different methods according to its classification.

Results: All patients were followed up for 6 to12 months with an average of 8.2 months. After treatment,the symptoms and signs of the patients improved significantly (P<0.01). According to the criteria of the Verhaar scoring system,35 of 46 patients with extra-articular type got an excellent result,9 good,2 fair; 24 of 34 patients with intra-articular type got an excellent result,9 good,1 fair;9 of 20 patients with mixed type got an excellent result,8 good,3 fair.

Conclusion: The causes of tennis elbow can not be explained by single pathogenesy,the patients with tennis elbow should be treated with different methods according to its classification,and the therapeutic effects can be improved.
KEYWORDS:Needle-knife  Tennis elbow  Classification  Elbow joint
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:朱胤晟,姚新苗,吕一.网球肘的分型及针刀治疗体会[J].中国骨伤,2013,26(8):659~662
英文格式:ZHU Yin-sheng,YAO Xin-miao,LU Yi.Small needle-knife for the treatment of tennis elbow according to its classification[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2013,26(8):659~662
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com