Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
胸腔镜辅助小切口手术与传统脊柱前路手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的病例回顾分析
Hits: 2031   Download times: 989   Received:November 15, 2011    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
彭明 PENG Ming 青岛市市立医院骨科,山东 青岛 266011 Department of Orthopaedics,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266011,Shandong,China  
曹新峰 CAO Xin-feng 青岛市市立医院骨科,山东 青岛 266011 Department of Orthopaedics,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266011,Shandong,China caoxf0101@sina.com 
彭国栋 PENG Guo-dong 青岛市市立医院骨科,山东 青岛 266011 Department of Orthopaedics,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266011,Shandong,China  
马晓程 MA Xiao-cheng 青岛市市立医院骨科,山东 青岛 266011 Department of Orthopaedics,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266011,Shandong,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2012年25卷,第9期,第747-750页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2012.09.010


目的:探讨胸腔镜辅助小切口手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的安全性与有效性.

方法:对2000年10月至2009年12月应用胸腔镜辅助小切口手术和传统脊柱前路手术治疗的44例胸腰椎骨折患者进行回顾性分析.胸腔镜辅助组23例,男15例,女8例;年龄19~76岁,平均41.4岁.传统手术组21例,男14例,女7例;年龄20~74岁,平均39.3岁.两组患者均行伤椎椎管前路减压、自体髂骨植骨、前路内固定术.平均随访时间18个月(6~36个月).比较两组患者的手术时间、出血量、术后伤椎椎管侵占率的下降值、Cobb角矫正度、Cobb角丢失度、ASIA评分改善情况的差异.

结果:手术时间、术中出血量、伤椎椎管侵占率的下降值、Cobb角的矫正度、Cobb角的丢失度、ASIA评分改善级数传统手术组分别为:(150.0±19.4) min、(970.0±72.0) ml、(35.5±6.4)%、(25.1±4.8)°、(1.0±0.7)°、(1.8±0.9)级;胸腔镜辅助组分别为(170.0±20.8) min、(650.0±65.4) ml、(33.2±8.0)%、(23.6±5.4)°、(1.1±0.8)°、(2.0±1.1)级. 两组患者术中出血量差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);而手术时间、术后伤椎椎管侵占率的下降值、Cobb角的矫正度、Cobb角的丢失度、ASIA评分改善级数无明显差异(P ﹥ 0.05).术后1年两组融合率均为100%.

结论:胸腔镜辅助小切口手术与传统脊柱前路手术相比,切口小,术中出血少,手术创伤小,疗效相似,是治疗胸腰椎骨折的一种有效、安全的手术方式.
[关键词]:胸腔镜  脊柱骨折  外科手术  回顾性研究
 
Retrospective study on treating thoracolumbar fractures with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and traditional anterior approach surgery
Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and the efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in treating thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods: From October 2000 to December 2009,the data of 44 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were retrospetively analyzed. All patients were treated with anterior decompression,auto-iliac bone graft and anterior internal fixation system. They were divided into thoracoscopic group(23 cases,treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) and traditional group (21 cases,treated with traditional anterior approach surgery). In the thoracoscopic group,there were 15 males and 8 females with an average age of 41.4 years (ranged,19 to 76);and in the traditional group,there were 14 males and 7 females with an average age of 39.3 years (ranged,20 to 74). All patients were followed up from 6 to 36 months with an average of 18 months. The operative time,volume of the blood loss,the decreased value of the occupation ratio of spinal canal (OR),the corrected and loss degree of Cobb angle,the improved condition of ASIA classification were compared between two groups.

Results: In traditional group,operative time,volume of the blood loss,the decreased value of the occupation ratio of spinal canal (OR),the corrected and loss degree of Cobb angle,the improved grade of ASIA classification were (150.0±19.4) min,(970.0±72.0) ml,(35.5±6.4)%,(25.1±4.8) °,(1.0±0.7)°,(1.8±0.9) grades,respectively;and in thoracoscopic group,the above items were (170.0±20.8) min,(650.0±65.4) ml,(33.2±8.0)%,(23.6±5.4) °,(1.1±0.8)°,(2.0±1.1) grades,respectively. There was significant difference in volume of the blood loss between two groups(P < 0.05);there was no significant difference in operative time,the decreased value of the occupation ratio of spinal canal(OR),the corrected and loss degree of Cobb angle,the improved grade of ASIA classification between two groups(P > 0.05). The rate of fusion of all patients was 100%.

Conclusion: Compared with the traditional anterior approach surgery,video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has advantages of little incision,less blood loss,less trauma,can obtain same clinical outcome and is a safe,effective method in treating thoracolumbar fractures.
KEYWORDS:Thoracoscopes  Spinal fractures  Surgical procedures,operative  Retrospective studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:彭明,曹新峰,彭国栋,马晓程.胸腔镜辅助小切口手术与传统脊柱前路手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的病例回顾分析[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(9):747~750
英文格式:PENG Ming,CAO Xin-feng,PENG Guo-dong,MA Xiao-cheng.Retrospective study on treating thoracolumbar fractures with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and traditional anterior approach surgery[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2012,25(9):747~750
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com