Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
钻孔法制造大鼠胫骨缺损性骨折动物模型初探
Hits: 2282   Download times: 328   Received:January 10, 2012    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张万强 ZHANG Wan-qiang 中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100700  
刘建清 LIU Jian-qing 江苏正大天晴药业股份有限公司  
王萱 WANG Xuan 中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100700  
田海霞 TIAN Hai-xia 北京市顺义区结核病防治中心  
王震 WANG Zhen 中国中医科学院基础理论研究所  
宋庆慧 SONG Qing-hui 中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100700  
朱嘉 ZHU Jia 中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100700  
马渊 MA Yuan 中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100700 Wangjing Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China mayuan_amms@hotmail.com 
赵宏普 ZHAO Hong-pu 中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100700  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2012年25卷,第6期,第509-511页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2012.06.018


目的: 比较两种缺损性骨折动物模型损伤量、愈合时间和愈合方式的差异,为探索建立新型缺损性骨折动物模型提供研究依据.

方法: SPF级雄性SD大鼠60只,随机分为正常组、锯开组和钻孔组3组,每组20只.正常组不做任何处理,其他两组动物经麻醉后,钻孔组用低速骨钻在胫骨平台下外侧钻约1 mm的圆孔缺损,缺损应能达到骨髓腔,但不可钻通对侧皮质(此方法为钻孔法);锯开组用骨锯在胫骨平台下外侧锯约3 mm左右的缺损,缺损应能达到骨髓腔(此方法为钻开法).术后2周和4周两个时间点每组取10只动物,检测大鼠胫骨的骨密度、骨灰重、拍摄胫骨X线片并进行胫骨病理切片观察,检测术后2周时骨Ca、P含量.

结果: 造模后2周,钻孔组和锯开组的骨密度,骨灰重,骨Ca、P含量均明显低于正常组(P<0.05或P<0.01).钻孔组和锯开组胫骨X线片可见骨折线模糊,病变端密度增高,骨痂形成.钻孔组和锯开组病理切片中均可见新生骨小梁形成.造模后4周时,钻孔组、锯开组与正常组相比骨密度、骨灰重无统计学差异(P>0.05),锯开组胫骨X线片中骨痂较钻孔组明显.钻孔组和锯开组动物胫骨病理切片示骨小梁粗大,并逐步融合成板状骨,锯开组动物骨痂处较钻孔组有较多炎性细胞浸润.

结论: 钻孔法和锯开法均可建立大鼠胫骨缺损性骨折模型,并且在损伤量接近的情况下,两种模型的愈合时间和方式相近.钻孔法操作相对简单规范,损伤量较易控制,并且较少出现炎性细胞浸润和骨不愈合.
[关键词]:骨折  胫骨  骨缺损  模型,动物  大鼠
 
Preliminary investigation of animal model of tibial defection fracture made by drilling hole method
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the differences in damage degree,healing time and healing process between two animal models of defection fracture and provide the research data for the estabishment of a new animal model.

Methods: Sixty male SPF Spragur-Dawley rats were divided randomly into control group,sawing group and drilling hole group,with 20 rats in each group. Animals of drilling hole group were treated with bone drill and made an 1 mm hole on tibial plateau;animals of sawing group were treated with saw and made an 3 mm defection on tibial plateau;nothing to do in animals of control group. The rats were respectively killed at 2nd,4th weeks after operation,bone density,bone ash quantity,contents of bone Ca,P were detected.

Results: At the 2nd week after operation,bone density,bone ash quantity,contents of bone Ca,P in drilling hole group and sawing group were significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05 or P<0.01). Two animal models of drilling hole group and sawing group were similar in X-ray films and pathology investigations. At the 4th week after operation,there were no significant defference in bone density and bone ash quantity among three groups(P>0.05). Rats of sawing group showed more poroma and inflammatory infiltration in histological examination.

Conclusion: Drilling hole method and sawing method could be used to make animal model of defection fracture,two methods showed similar damage degree,healing time and healing process,but drilling hole method have advantages of simple operation,easily control damage degree and less inflammatory infiltration and bone disunion.
KEYWORDS:Fractures  Tibia  Bone defections  Models,animal  Rats
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张万强,刘建清,王萱,田海霞,王震,宋庆慧,朱嘉,马渊,赵宏普.钻孔法制造大鼠胫骨缺损性骨折动物模型初探[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(6):509~511
英文格式:ZHANG Wan-qiang,LIU Jian-qing,WANG Xuan,TIAN Hai-xia,WANG Zhen,SONG Qing-hui,ZHU Jia,MA Yuan,ZHAO Hong-pu.Preliminary investigation of animal model of tibial defection fracture made by drilling hole method[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2012,25(6):509~511
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com