Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
手法及中药辅助治疗腰椎间盘突出症慢性阶段的病例对照研究
Hits: 2488   Download times: 1493   Received:May 30, 2011    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张宇 ZHANG Yu 中国中医科学院望京医院脊柱一科,北京 100102 Department of the First Spinal Surgery, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China  
吴冠男 WU Guan-nan 中国中医科学院望京医院脊柱一科,北京 100102 Department of the First Spinal Surgery, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China  
李星 LI Xing 中国中医科学院望京医院脊柱一科,北京 100102 Department of the First Spinal Surgery, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China 271267062@qq.com 
章永东 ZHANG Yong-dong 中国中医科学院望京医院脊柱一科,北京 100102 Department of the First Spinal Surgery, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China  
黎作旭 LI Zuo-xu 中国中医科学院望京医院脊柱一科,北京 100102 Department of the First Spinal Surgery, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China  
马明 MA Ming 中国中医科学院望京医院脊柱一科,北京 100102 Department of the First Spinal Surgery, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China  
雷仲民 LEI Zhong-min 北京中医医院  
李俊杰 LI Jun-jie 北京电力医院  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2011年24卷,第11期,第926-929页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2011.11.013


目的:观察以手法配合中药和以牵引配合西药两种治疗手段对腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)慢性阶段的治疗效果,对比两者疗效。

方法:采用多中心、中央区组的研究方法,对2008年11月28日至2010年5月7日收治的200例LDH患者进行临床研究,其中治疗组100例,男45例,女55例;平均年龄(43.43±9.18)岁;应用“手法加中药导入加口服汤药”治疗,疗程3周。对照组100例,脱落5例,男38例,女57例;平均年龄(42.29±9.78)岁,应用“牵引加理疗加口服西药”治疗,疗程3周。应用VAS、M-JOA、LMS及分级疗效评定进行组间及治疗前后观察指标比较和疗效评价。

结果:治疗前后比较:治疗组治疗后较治疗前VAS及M-JOA改善,治疗前后LMS差异无统计学意义;对照组治疗后较治疗前VAS及M-JOA改善,治疗前后LMS差异无统计学意义。组间比较:治疗后治疗组VAS及M-JOA的改善优于对照组,两组间LMS差异无统计学意义。疗效评价:治疗组优41例,良34例,可13例,差12例;对照组优35例,良16例,可19例,差25例,治疗组疗效优于对照组。

结论:两种治疗方法均能改善LDH患者的VAS及M-JOA,且治疗组的改善情况好于对照组,两种治疗方法对下肢肌力的改善均不明显。
[关键词]:椎间盘移位  手法,骨科  牵引术  中草药  前瞻性研究  病例对照研究
 
Case-control study on manipulation combined with Chinese herbs for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation within chronic stage
Abstract:

Objective: To observe and compare the therapeutic effects of two methods to lumbar disc herniation treated by manipulation combined with Chinese herbs and traction with Western medicine.

Methods: A multi-center with a central district unit was used to study the patients with lumbar disc herniation from November 28th, 2008 to May 7th, 2010. All the patients were divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment group had 100 cases, including 45 males and 55 females, averaged(43. 43±9. 18) years. The treatment group was treated by manipulation combined with Chinese herbs;Control group had 100 cases (5 cases were fall off), including 38 males and 57 females, averaged(42. 29±9. 78) years. The control group was treated by traction with Western medicine. The course of treatment was 3 weeks. VAS, M-JOA, LMS(lower limb muscle strength) and classification efficacy was used to evaluate outcome and therapeutic effects before and after treatment.

Results: VAS and M-JOA were improved after the treatment both in treatment group and control group; there was no significant difference in LMS before and after treatment in both groups. VAS and M-JOA in treatment group was superior to those of control group after treatment. There was no significant difference in LMS. According to classification efficacy, 41 cases got excellent result, 34 good, 13 fair and 12 poor in treatment group; in control group, 35 cases obtained excellent results, 16 good, 19 fair and 25 poor. The effect of treatment group was better than that of control group.

Conclusion: Both of two methods can improve the score of VAS, M-JOA, and treatment group is better than that of control group. While for the improvement of LMS, both of two methods have no obvious effects.
KEYWORDS:Intervertebral disk displacement  Manipulation, Orthopedic  Traction  Drugs, Chinese herbal  Prospective studies  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张宇,吴冠男,李星,章永东,黎作旭,马明,雷仲民,李俊杰.手法及中药辅助治疗腰椎间盘突出症慢性阶段的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(11):926~929
英文格式:ZHANG Yu,WU Guan-nan,LI Xing,ZHANG Yong-dong,LI Zuo-xu,MA Ming,LEI Zhong-min,LI Jun-jie.Case-control study on manipulation combined with Chinese herbs for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation within chronic stage[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2011,24(11):926~929
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com