Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
桥式钢丝夹板外固定与Bryant牵引治疗小儿股骨干骨折的病例对照研究
Hits: 2926   Download times: 1347   Received:July 27, 2010    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
周炎 ZHOU Yan 罗田县人民医院骨科,湖北 罗田 438600 Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Luotian County,Luotian 438600,Hubei,China zy_0827@yahoo.com.cn 
瞿新丛 QU Xin-cong 罗田县人民医院骨科,湖北 罗田 438600 Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Luotian County,Luotian 438600,Hubei,China  
方祖怡 FANG Zu-yi 罗田县人民医院骨科,湖北 罗田 438600 Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Luotian County,Luotian 438600,Hubei,China  
刘祥 LIU Xiang 罗田县人民医院骨科,湖北 罗田 438600 Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Luotian County,Luotian 438600,Hubei,China  
潘晓辉 PAN Xiao-hui 罗田县人民医院骨科,湖北 罗田 438600 Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Luotian County,Luotian 438600,Hubei,China  
丰峰 FENG Feng 罗田县人民医院骨科,湖北 罗田 438600 Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Luotian County,Luotian 438600,Hubei,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2011年24卷,第3期,第236-239页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2011.03.017


目的:回顾性研究桥式钢丝夹板外固定治疗小儿股骨干骨折的临床疗效,并与传统Bryant牵引的疗效进行比较。

方法:2006年6月至2009年6月收治的小儿股骨干骨折38例,采用桥式钢丝夹板外固定及Bryant牵引两种方法治疗。桥式钢丝夹板组21例中男15例,女6例;年龄8个月~5.3岁,平均(2.3±0.6)岁;按骨折部位分类,股骨上1/3骨折5例,中1/3骨折9例,下1/3骨折7例。Bryant牵引组中男10例,女7例;年龄10个月~3.2岁,平均(2.2±0.4)岁;按骨折部位分类,股骨上1/3骨折4例,中1/3骨折10例,下1/3骨折3例。对两组临床功能、X线愈合时间、负重时间及并发症等进行比较。

结果:桥式钢丝夹板组与Bryant牵引组骨折平均愈合时间分别为(6.0±0.3)、(6.2±0.4)周,负重时间分别为(6.1±1.0)、(6.4±1.2)周,两组比较差异无统计学意义。桥式钢丝夹板组软组织并发症3例,Bryant牵引组13例,两组比较差异有统计学意义。根据临床疗效标准,桥式钢丝夹板组优17例,良3例,可1例,Bryant牵引组优12例,良4例,可1例;两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义。

结论:桥式钢丝夹板外固定及传统Bryant牵引治疗小儿股骨干骨折均能获得较为理想的疗效,与Bryant牵引相比,桥式钢丝夹板外固定具有操作简单、护理方便、疗效安全可靠等优点。
[关键词]:股骨骨折  外固定器  牵引术  儿童  病例对照研究
 
Comparison of efficacy between bridge wire splints and Bryant traction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children
Abstract:

Objective: To compare clinical effects between bridge wire splint fixation and traditional Bryant traction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children.

Methods: From June 2006 to June 2009,38 children with femoral shaft fractures were treated with bridge wire splint fixation and Bryant traction. In bridge wire splint group,there were 15 males and 6 females,ranging in age from 8 months to 5.3 years,with an average of (2.3±0.6) years. According to fracture site classification,5 patients were upper 1/3 femoral fractures,9 patients were middle 1/3 femoral fractures,and 7 patients were lower 1/3 femoral fractures. In Bryant traction group,there were 10 males and 7 females,ranging in age from 10 months to 3.2 years,with an average of(2.2±0.4)years. According to fracture site classification,4 cases were upper 1/3 femoral fractures,10 patients were middle 1/3 femoral fractures,3 patients were lower 1/3 femoral fractures. The clinical features,X-ray healing time,weight-bearing time and complications of the two groups were compared.

Results: Comparison of fracture healing time:bridge wire splint group was(6.0±0.3) weeks and Bryant traction group was(6.2±0.4) weeks;the time of weight-bearing in bridge wire splint group was (6.1±1.0) weeks and in Bryant traction group was (6.4±1.2) weeks;there was no significant difference between two groups. There was a significant difference in soft tissue complication between bridge wire splint group occurred in 3 cases and 13 cases in Bryant traction group. According to the criteria of clinical efficacy,in Bryant traction group,12 patients got an excellent result,4 good and 1 fair;in bridge wire splint group,the data were 17,3 and 1 respectively,and there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion: Both of bridge wire splint fixation and traditional Bryant traction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children have good efficacy. Compared with Bryant traction,bridge wire splint fixation is simple,safe and has reliable effect.
KEYWORDS:Femoral fractures  External fixators  Traction  Child  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:周炎,瞿新丛,方祖怡,刘祥,潘晓辉,丰峰.桥式钢丝夹板外固定与Bryant牵引治疗小儿股骨干骨折的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(3):236~239
英文格式:ZHOU Yan,QU Xin-cong,FANG Zu-yi,LIU Xiang,PAN Xiao-hui,FENG Feng.Comparison of efficacy between bridge wire splints and Bryant traction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2011,24(3):236~239
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com