Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
股骨远端骨折3种内固定方法的生物力学研究比较
Hits: 1874   Download times: 1092   Received:May 20, 2010    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
韩擎天 HAN Qing-tian 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院嘉定分院骨科, 上海 201800 Department of Orthopaedic,Jiading Area Central Hospital,Shanghai 201800,China thwgmy@hotmail.com 
王以进 WANG Yi-jin 上海大学生物学研究所  
汤红伟 TANG Hong-wei 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院嘉定分院骨科, 上海 201800 Department of Orthopaedic,Jiading Area Central Hospital,Shanghai 201800,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2010年23卷,第8期,第601-604页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2010.08.013


目的:对股骨远端骨折三种内固定方法进行定量生物力学比较,为临床选择有效的内固定方法提供理论依据。

方法:取12具新鲜尸体股骨标本,制成股骨髁间骨折模型(AO分类的C1型),采用股骨交锁髓内钉(A)、“L”形髁钢板(B)、加压钢板(C)3种内固定方法,观察股骨髁上应变、位移、刚度、强度,对股骨远端3种内固定方法进行生物力学分析,并以有限元理论分析论证它的结果。

结果:试验发现在受同等载荷条件下,髁上交锁髓内钉固定强度、刚度最佳,而采用“L”形髁钢板和加压钢板固定股骨髁强度、刚度较差。3组应力和髁间位移均有显着差异性(P<0.05).

结论:采用股骨髁上交锁髓内钉固定方法优于其他内固定方法,具有操作简单、锁钉定位准确、固定牢靠等优点,是治疗股骨远端骨折较好的内固定方法。
[关键词]:股骨骨折  骨折固定术,内  生物力学
 
Biomechanical comparison of three methods of internal fixation for distal femoral fractures
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the biomechanics of three internal fixations for distal femoral fractures,and to choose suitable clinical internal fixation according to experimental date.

Methods: The fracture models of femoral condydle were made on 12 fresh cadaver femurs (C1 type of AO classification). The fractures were fixed by supracondylar intramedullary interlocking nails(A),L-shaped condyle plates(B)and compressed plates(C)respectively. The straining,displacement,rigidity and intensity of femoral supracondyla of the three internal fixations of distal femoral fractures were observed and analyzed by biomechanics. These three different internal fixation methods were compared by experimental stress analysis. These results were further confirmed by theoretical analysis using finite element method(FFM).

Results: Under the same load condition,supracondylar intramedullary interlocking nail fixation was the best on the intensity and rigidity,while for compressed plate and L- shaped condyle plate,the femoral condyle intensity and rigidity were worse(P<0.05). There were distinct differences in stress and displacement among three methods(P<0.01).

Conclusion: Supracondylar intermedullary interlocking nail is the best method among the three internal fixation methods. It has advantage such as screw location,solid fixation and less complication. It is a good internal fixation method for distal femoral fracture.
KEYWORDS:Femoral fractures  Fracture fixation,internal  Biomechanics
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:韩擎天,王以进,汤红伟.股骨远端骨折3种内固定方法的生物力学研究比较[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(8):601~604
英文格式:HAN Qing-tian,WANG Yi-jin,TANG Hong-wei.Biomechanical comparison of three methods of internal fixation for distal femoral fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2010,23(8):601~604
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com