Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
小夹板和石膏托外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的比较研究
Hits: 3041   Download times: 1605   Received:February 25, 2010    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张雄辉 ZHANG Xiong-hui 河源市中医院, 广东 河源 517000 Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Heyuan 517000,Guangdong,China Xiong Hui S@126.com 
肖智青 XIAO Zhi-qing 河源市中医院, 广东 河源 517000 Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Heyuan 517000,Guangdong,China  
王爱明 WANG Ai-ming 河源市中医院, 广东 河源 517000 Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Heyuan 517000,Guangdong,China  
张火林 ZHANG Huo-lin 河源市中医院, 广东 河源 517000 Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Heyuan 517000,Guangdong,China  
黎惠金 LI Hui-jin 河源市中医院, 广东 河源 517000 Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Heyuan 517000,Guangdong,China  
黄少泉 HUANG Shao-quan 河源市中医院, 广东 河源 517000 Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Heyuan 517000,Guangdong,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2010年23卷,第8期,第578-580页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2010.08.06


目的:研究杉树皮夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的优越性。

方法:2006年1月至2008年6月将80例桡骨远端骨折患者分为2组,杉树皮小夹板组40例,男18例,女22例,年龄20~66岁,平均45.2岁;石膏托组40例,男19例,女21例,年龄23~65岁,平均44.1岁。所有病例均行手法复位固定,4周后摄X线片观察骨折固定效果、患肢功能恢复情况、第2掌骨骨密度,并以比正常骨折愈合时间提前多少为疗效判定标准评定疗效。

结果:两组固定效果比较,杉树皮小夹板优于石膏组(Z=-2.844,P=0.004<0.05);功能恢复比较,杉树皮小夹板优于石膏组(Z=-3.196,P=0.001<0.05).第2掌骨骨密度比较,杉树皮小夹板优于石膏组(t=4.56,P<0.001).两组疗效评价结果比较,杉树皮小夹板组优于石膏托组(Z=-2.601,P=0.009<0.05).

结论:杉树皮小夹板能有效地保证固定的稳定,明显促进骨折愈合和功能恢复。
[关键词]:桡骨骨折  外固定器  小夹板固定  石膏,外科  骨密度  临床对照试验
 
Comparison study of small splint fixation and plaster slab fixation for the treatment of distal radius fractures
Abstract:

Objective: To study the advantage of fir bark splint for the treatmet of distal radius fracture.

Methods: From January 2006 to June 2008,80 cases were randomly divided into two groups and treated by fir bark splint fixation or plaster fixation. There were 40 cases in the fir bark splint group,including 18 males and 22 females with an average age of 45.2 years ranging from 20 to 66 years. There were 40 cases in the plaster group, including 19 males and 21 females with an average age of 44.1 years ranging from 23 to 65 years. Four weeks after manipulative reduction and external fixation,the fixtion effect,function recovery,bone mineral density of secondly metacarpus were obsearved by X-ray film,and the clinical effect were evaluated according to healing time ahead of schedule.

Results: As compared between the two groups,the fixation effect of the fir bark splint group was better than that of the plaster group(Z=-2.844,P=0.004<0.05);the function recovery of the fir bark splint group was better than that of the plaster group(Z=-3.196,P=0.001<0.05);the bone mineral density of secondly metacarpus of the fir bark splint group were better than that of plaster group(t=4.56,P<0.001);the curative effect of fir bark splint group was better than that of the plaster group(Z=-2.601,P=0.009<0.05).

Conclusion: Fir bark splint could effectively keep fixation stability and promote fracture healing as well as function recovery.
KEYWORDS:Radius fractures  Externa1 fixators  Small splint fixation  Casts,surgical  Bone density  Controlled clinical trials
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张雄辉,肖智青,王爱明,张火林,黎惠金,黄少泉.小夹板和石膏托外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的比较研究[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(8):578~580
英文格式:ZHANG Xiong-hui,XIAO Zhi-qing,WANG Ai-ming,ZHANG Huo-lin,LI Hui-jin,HUANG Shao-quan.Comparison study of small splint fixation and plaster slab fixation for the treatment of distal radius fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2010,23(8):578~580
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com