Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
掌侧“T”形钢板和外固定支架治疗尺桡骨远端复杂骨折的疗效分析
Hits: 2346   Download times: 1221   Received:December 23, 2009    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张传毅 ZHANG Chuan-yi 台州医院骨科, 浙江 临海 317000 Department of Orthopaedics,Taizhou Hospital,Linhai 317000,Zhejiang,China Zhangchuanyi@yahoo.com.cn 
马毅 MA Yi 台州医院骨科, 浙江 临海 317000 Department of Orthopaedics,Taizhou Hospital,Linhai 317000,Zhejiang,China  
王章富 WANG Zhang-fu 台州医院骨科, 浙江 临海 317000 Department of Orthopaedics,Taizhou Hospital,Linhai 317000,Zhejiang,China  
洪正华 HONG Zheng-hua 台州医院骨科, 浙江 临海 317000 Department of Orthopaedics,Taizhou Hospital,Linhai 317000,Zhejiang,China  
陈海啸 CHEN Hai-xiao 台州医院骨科, 浙江 临海 317000 Department of Orthopaedics,Taizhou Hospital,Linhai 317000,Zhejiang,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2010年23卷,第8期,第575-577页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2010.08.005


目的:比较掌侧“T”形钢板和外固定支架治疗尺桡骨远端复杂骨折的疗效,探讨治疗该型骨折的有效手术方法。

方法:2005年7月至2007年7月,分别采用切开复位桡骨掌侧“T”形钢板内固定、外固定支架结合克氏针有限内固定两种手术方法治疗48例尺桡骨远端复杂骨折。其中内固定组男21例,女9例,年龄22~52岁,平均(38.4±1.5)岁;外固定支架组男10例,女8例,年龄25~56岁,平均(40.5±2.3)岁。术后复查X线片,测量桡骨高度和掌倾角、尺偏角,比较两组患者的差异。分别于术后6、12个月采用改良Gartland -Werley(GW)评分方法评定两组患者的腕关节功能。

结果:所有患者均得到随访,时间12~18个月,平均14.2个月。术后测量影像学参数,桡骨高度:内固定组平均(8.82±0.55) mm,外固定支架组平均(8.25±0.36) mm;掌倾角:内固定组平均(9.23±0.86)°,外固定支架组平均(8.56±0.72)°;尺偏角:内固定组平均(19.66±1.38)°,外固定支架组平均(18.82±1.42)°。内固定组均优于外固定支架组,但两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).6个月时内固定组中优16例,良7例,可5例,差2例;外固定支架组优4例,良2例,可8例,差4例;内固定组GW评分低于外固定支架组, 两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).12个月时内固定组优17例,良7例,可5例,差1例;外固定组优5例,良9例,可2例,差2例;内固定组GW评分也低于外固定支架组,但两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).

结论:切开复位掌侧钢板内固定相对于外固定支架的方法,功能恢复快,并发症少,短期疗效前者明显优于后者。但是从远期疗效看,两种方法治疗后腕关节功能无明显差异。
[关键词]:桡骨骨折  外固定器  骨折固定术,内  临床对照试验
 
Comparative study of two operation methods on complicated fractures of the distal radius and ulna
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the differences between external fixator and volar T-shaped plate in the treatment of complicated fractures of the distal radius and ulna,and evaluate the appropriate operation method for the fractures.

Methods: From July 2005 to July 2007,forty-eight cases of complicated fractures of the distal radius and ulna were treated with operation. There were 21 males and 9 females in the internal fixator group,ranged from 22 to 52 years old(with an average of 38.4±1.5 years). There were 10 mals and 8 femals in the external fixator group,ranged from 25 to 56 years old (with an average of 40.5±2.3 years). The X-ray films were measured to acquire radial length,palmar tilt and radial inclination after operations. The functional evaluation were scored with a modified Gartland and Werley's(GW) scoring system at 6 and 12 months after operation.

Results: The patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months with an average of 14.2 months. The radial length was (8.82±0.55) mm,palmar tilt (9.23±0.86)°,radial inclination(19.66±1.38)° in the internal fixator group,while those were(8.25±0.36) mm,(8.56±0.72)°,(18.82±1.42)° in the external fixator group. The film parameter of internal fixator group was better than the external fixator group,but with no statistical significance(P>0.05). In the internal fixator group,16 cases obtained excellent,7 good,5 fair,2 poor,while in the external fixator group,4 cases obtained excellent,2 good,8 fair,4 poor in 6 months. The GW scores of internal fixator group were lower than that of the external fixator group(P<0.05). At 12 months after surgery,in the internal fixator group,17 cases obtained excellent,7 good,5 fair,1 poor;while in the external fixator group,5 cases obtained excellent,9 good,2 fair,2 poor. The GW score was similar between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion: The volar T-shaped plate fixation may offer effective stability,the short-term outcome is better than the external fixator group,and there are relatively fewer complications. But the treatment outcome of the two operation methods are similar for the long time follow up.
KEYWORDS:Radius fractures  External fixators  Fracture fixation,internal  Controlled clinical trials
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张传毅,马毅,王章富,洪正华,陈海啸.掌侧“T”形钢板和外固定支架治疗尺桡骨远端复杂骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(8):575~577
英文格式:ZHANG Chuan-yi,MA Yi,WANG Zhang-fu,HONG Zheng-hua,CHEN Hai-xiao.Comparative study of two operation methods on complicated fractures of the distal radius and ulna[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2010,23(8):575~577
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com