Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
带锁髓内针与旋入髓内针治疗股骨干骨折的病例对照研究
Hits: 2448   Download times: 1451   Received:June 05, 2008    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
张满江 ZHANG Man-jiang 吉林大学第二医院骨科,吉林 长春 130041 Department of Orthopaedics,the Second Hospital Affiliated of Jinlin University,Changchun 130041,Jilin,China  
孙树东 SUN Shu-dong 吉林大学第二医院骨科,吉林 长春 130041 Department of Orthopaedics,the Second Hospital Affiliated of Jinlin University,Changchun 130041,Jilin,China  
张欣 ZHANG Xin 吉林大学第二医院骨科,吉林 长春 130041 Department of Orthopaedics,the Second Hospital Affiliated of Jinlin University,Changchun 130041,Jilin,China  
杨东昭 YANG Dong-zhao 吉林油田总医院骨科  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2008年21卷,第10期,第766-768页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:就带锁髓内针与旋入式髓内针治疗股骨干新鲜骨折的临床疗效等方面进行对比,以供临床参考。

方法:回顾性分析带锁髓内针和旋入髓内针治疗的股骨干骨折患者60例,男 49 例,女 11 例; 年龄 12~68 岁,平均 33.5 岁;其中稳定型骨折(股骨干狭窄段以上的横断、短斜或短螺旋骨折)41例,不稳定型骨折(狭窄段破坏粉碎大于直径 50%的长斜及螺旋骨折、髓腔扩大的中下 1/3骨折、多段骨折等) 19例;均为新鲜骨折,不合并重要神经血管损伤。手术时间为伤后 2 h~7 d .采用上述两种髓内针进行内固定。带锁髓内针治疗组患者术后即刻开始邻近关节功能活动,4~5 d后开始患肢10~15 kg的部分负重。旋入髓内针治疗组切口愈合后开始关节活动,6周后开始部分负重功能练习。然后,分别就其生物力学特点、手术操作、术后并发症、骨折愈合时间、患肢功能恢复以及手术适应证等方面进行分析、比较。

结果:平均随访13个月,带锁髓内针组: 闭和性骨折平均骨性愈合时间为 16 周,开放性骨折平均骨性愈合时间为 20 周。愈合率 100%,畸形愈合率为 7.9% .下肢功能恢复优 27 例,良1 例,中 1 例,差 1 例,优良率93.3% .旋入髓内针组: 闭和性骨折平均骨性愈合时间为 16周,开放性骨折平均骨性愈合时间为 23 周。愈合率 87%,畸形愈合率为 18.2% .下肢功能恢复优 23 例,良 2例,中 3 例,差 2 例,优良率 83.3% .两组术后均未见金属断裂和骨不连现象。两组疗效在骨折愈合时间、畸形愈合率、再次手术率及术后功能恢复优良率等项指标差异明显。

结论:带锁髓内针与旋入髓内针相比较对不同类型不同部位的股骨干骨折更具有可靠性、可操作性,并且可以降低主要并发症的发生率。旋入髓内针在其适应证内有较好疗效。
[关键词]:股骨骨折  骨折固定术,髓内  外科手术
 
The comparisive study of the clinical effect of rotary self-locking intramedullary nail and intramedullary interlocking nail for the treatment of femur fracture
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical effect of rotary self-locking intramedullary nail (RSIN) and intramedullary interlocking nail(IIN) for the treatment of fresh femoral shaft fracture.

Methods: The radiological records of 60 fresh femoral shaft fractures(41 stable fractures and 19 unstable fractures) were retrospectively analyzed. Among them,49 were male and 11 were female. The average age was 33.5 years old(range from 12 to 68 years old). All cases were fresh fracture with no important blood vessel or nerve injury,which were taken operation with RSIN on IIN respectively in 2 h-7 d after injury. The patients in IIN group began functional movements at postoperative 4 to 5 days and could bear the weight of 10-15 kg. The patients in RSIN group could began functional exercises after the wound healed and bear partly weight after 6 weeks. Both groups were contrasted on the biomechanics,operation procedure,fracture healing time,functional recovery and operative indication.

Results: Both groups were followed-up for average 13 months. IIN group:the average healing time of closed femur fracture was 16 weeks while that of open fracture was 20 weeks. The healing rate was 100% and the malunion rate was 7.9%. The excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 93.3% including excellent in 27 cases, good in 1,fair in 1 and bad in 1. RSIN group: the average healing time of closed femur fracture was 16 weeks while open fracture was 23 weeks. The healing rate was 87% and the malunion rate was 18.2%. The excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 83.3% including excellent in 23 cases,good in 2,fair in 3 and bad in 2. No implant break and nonunion happened. The differences between two groups in healing time,deformity-union rate and the rate of the twice operation were statistically significant.

Conclusion: IIN provides a reliable and practical alternative method for the treatment of all kinds of femoral shaft fracture and its important complication is fewer than RSIN group. RSIN also has a good curative effect in its own indication.
KEYWORDS:Femoral fractures  Fracture fixation,intramedullary  Surgical procedures,operative
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:张满江,孙树东,张欣,杨东昭.带锁髓内针与旋入髓内针治疗股骨干骨折的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2008,21(10):766~768
英文格式:ZHANG Man-jiang,SUN Shu-dong,ZHANG Xin,YANG Dong-zhao.The comparisive study of the clinical effect of rotary self-locking intramedullary nail and intramedullary interlocking nail for the treatment of femur fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2008,21(10):766~768
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com