Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
股骨粗隆间骨折不同内固定方法的回顾性比较
Hits: 2520   Download times: 1562   Received:August 20, 2007    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
金永明 JIN Yong-ming 浙江省人民医院骨科,浙江 杭州 310014 Department of Orthopaedics of Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,Zhejiang,China kingym78@hotmail.com 
陈锦平 CHEN Jin-ping 浙江省人民医院骨科,浙江 杭州 310014 Department of Orthopaedics of Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,Zhejiang,China  
李晓林 LI Xiao-lin 浙江省人民医院骨科,浙江 杭州 310014 Department of Orthopaedics of Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,Zhejiang,China  
黄亚增 HUANG Ya-zeng 浙江省人民医院骨科,浙江 杭州 310014 Department of Orthopaedics of Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,Zhejiang,China  
杨迪 YANG Di 浙江省人民医院骨科,浙江 杭州 310014 Department of Orthopaedics of Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,Zhejiang,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2008年21卷,第5期,第329-332页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:比较不同内固定方法在治疗股骨粗隆间骨折中的优缺点,探讨股骨粗隆间骨折内固定选择的策略。

方法:股骨粗隆间骨折患者326例行内固定手术,其中动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip screw)固定(DHS组)165例,男78例,女87例,年龄38~98岁;股骨近端解剖钢板(anatomic plate)固定(AP组)103例,男48例,女55例,年龄39~89岁;可膨胀股骨近端钉(proximal femoral nail)固定(PFN组)58例,男31例,女27例,年龄41~92岁。根据Evans股骨粗隆间骨折分型分为I、II、III、IV型及逆粗隆间骨折共5型,各组病例数分别为DHS组(12、35、61、42、15),AP组(9、23、38、25、8),PFN组(6、13、21、13、5).比较上述3组在手术时间、术中出血量、术中X线暴露次数、术后引流量、骨折临床愈合时间、术后功能评分、手术并发症等方面的结果。

结果:DHS、AP和PFN组在手术时间、术中出血量、术中X线暴露次数、术后引流量、骨折临床愈合时间、术后功能评分等方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),PFN组较DHS、AP组手术时间缩短、术中出血量和术后引流量少、骨折临床愈合时间缩短、术后功能恢复好,但术中X线暴露次数明显多。各组手术并发症的差异无统计学意义(P=0.05).

结论:可膨胀股骨近端钉在治疗股骨粗隆间骨折中具有一定的优势。
[关键词]:髋骨折  骨折固定术,内  回顾性研究
 
Retrospective study of comparing the different internal fixation methods in treating intertrochanteric fracture of femur
Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the selective strategy of the internal fixation methods in treating intertrochanteric femoral fracture by comparing the different methods.

Methods: Data of 326 cases of intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with different internal fixation methods were concluded. One hundred and sixty-five cases were treated with the dynamic hip screws(DHS group),78 ma1e,87 female,age 38 to 98 years. One hundred and three cases were treated with the anatomical plates of proximal femur(AP group),48 ma1e,55 female,age 39 to 89 years. Fifty-eight cases were treated with the fixation expandable proximal femoral nails (PFN group),31 male,27 female,age 41 to 92 years. According to Evans classification of intertrochanteric femoral fractures,fractures were divided into type I, II, III, IV and retro-intertrochanteric type. The cases of each type of three groups were DHS(12,35,61,42,15);AP(9,23,38,25,8);PFN(6,13,21,13,5). Data of each group was collected for statistical analysis on the following aspects:operation time,blood loss,fluoroscopy exposures,drainage,clinical healing time of fracture,post-operative restored function and the total complications.

Results: The difference of operation time,blood loss,fluoroscopy exposures,drainage,clinical healing time of fracture,post-operative restored function were of statistical significance(P<0.01). In comparing with group DHS and AP,group PFN was of less operation time,blood loss,drainage,clinical healing time of fracture,but more fluoroscopy exposures,and the post-operative restored function of group PFN was more satisfied. The difference of operative complications were of no statistical significance(P=0.05).

Conclusion: The fixation expa- ndable proximal femoral nail is a good choice for intertrochanteric femoral fracture.
KEYWORDS:Hip fractures  Fracture fixation,internal  Retrospective studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:金永明,陈锦平,李晓林,黄亚增,杨迪.股骨粗隆间骨折不同内固定方法的回顾性比较[J].中国骨伤,2008,21(5):329~332
英文格式:JIN Yong-ming,CHEN Jin-ping,LI Xiao-lin,HUANG Ya-zeng,YANG Di.Retrospective study of comparing the different internal fixation methods in treating intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2008,21(5):329~332
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com