Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
切吸联合不同溶核疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症
Hits: 2012   Download times: 1196   Received:April 12, 2005    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
余庆阳 YU Qing-yang 龙岩市博爱医院骨伤科, 福建龙岩364000 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,the Humanity Hospital of Longyan,Longyan 364000,Fujian,China bayqy@163.com 
何斌 HE Bin 南京医科大学第二附属医院骨科  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2005年18卷,第10期,第593-596页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:分析比较3种不同联合疗法治疗突出型L4,5椎间盘突出症的临床疗效,并观察其不良反应。

方法:本组59例,男36例,女23例;年龄19~69岁,平均(38.18±10.24)岁。将所有病例随机分为3组进行相应治疗切吸+盘内法组(A组)15例,切吸+盘外法组(B组)26例,切吸+盘内外法组(C组)18例。

结果:59例术后进行了4个月以上的随访,近期总优良率72.88%,总有效率96.61%;远期总优良率72.88%,总有效率86.44%。但各组间近、远期疗效差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05)。

结论:以上3种不同联合疗法均是临床治疗突出型腰椎间盘突出的有效方法,且不良反应少。
[关键词]:椎间盘移位  椎间盘切除术,经皮  椎间盘化学溶解术
 
Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with percutaneous lumbar discectomy and different collagenase injections
Abstract:

Objective: To compare and evaluate effects and adverse reaction of three different methods in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Methods:Fifty-nine patients of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,involving 36 cases of male and 23 cases of female with age from 19 to 69 (averagely 38.18±10.24) years,were divided randomly into three groups:Group A in which patients were treated with percutaneous lumbar discectomy and intervertebral disc injection (15 cases);group B,treated with percntaneous lumbar discectomy and epidural injection (26 cases);group C,treated by percntaneous lumbar discectomy,intervertebral disc and epidural injection (18 cases).

Results:All the patients were followed up for more than 4 months.There were no significant difference in near-term and long-term clinical effects among the three different treatments.The total rates of excellent and good clinical effects were the same,i.e.72.88%,in the near-term and the long-term evaluations.The total effective rate was 96.61% in the near-term evaluation,and 86.44% in the long-term evaluation.

Conclusion:The three different methods are effective for lumbar disc herniation,of which adverse reaction is few.
KEYWORDS:Intervertebral disk displacement  Diskectomy,percutaneous  Intervertebral disk chemolysis
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:余庆阳,何斌.切吸联合不同溶核疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国骨伤,2005,18(10):593~596
英文格式:YU Qing-yang,HE Bin.Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with percutaneous lumbar discectomy and different collagenase injections[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2005,18(10):593~596
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com