Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
三种交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较
Hits: 2025   Download times: 1344   Received:January 03, 2004    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
罗国良 LUO Guo-Liang 天河区中医医院, 广东广州510655 Tianhe District Hospital of TCM Lw2000n.163.net 
刘晓虹 LIU Xiao-hong 天河区中医医院, 广东广州510655 Tianhe District Hospital of TCM  
罗昌军 LUO Chang-jun 天河区中医医院, 广东广州510655 Tianhe District Hospital of TCM  
黎友允 LI You-yun 天河区中医医院, 广东广州510655 Tianhe District Hospital of TCM  
方磊 FANG Lei 天河区中医医院, 广东广州510655 Tianhe District Hospital of TCM  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2004年17卷,第7期,第411-413页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:评价静力扩髓型、动力扩髓型和动力不扩髓型三种类型的交锁髓内钉对胫骨骨折的疗效。

方法:骨折类型采用AO骨折分型法,A型18例,B型32例,C型12例,共62例,均采用切开复位内固定治疗方法。

结果:62例均获得随访,平均随访时间为13个月。根据胫骨干骨折治疗最终效果的评价标准评价术后功能,优46例,良11例,一般4例,差1例。

结论:A型骨折三种髓内钉比较,骨折愈合时间有非常显著性差异;B型骨折三种髓内钉愈合时间比较,其中扩髓型与不扩髓型有非常显著性差异,而扩髓型中静力型与动力型间无显著性差异;C型骨折静力扩髓型与动力不扩髓型愈合时间比较,有非常显著性差异。术中宜尽量避免扩髓,并以采用不扩髓钛合金三角形交锁钉为佳。
[关键词]:胫骨骨折  骨折固定术,内  交锁髓内钉
 
Comparison of therapeutic effect of tibial fracture with three different methods for locked intramedullary nail
Abstract:

Objective:To compare the therapeutic effect of tibial fracture with different methods for locked intramedullary nail.

Methods:62 cases of tibial and fibularis fracture were treated with open reduction and different internal fixation,of which effect were analyzed.

Results:All the cases were followed up for an average of 13 months after operation.According to the criteria of Johner-Wruhs,therapeutic effectiveness was excellent in 46 cases,good in 11 cases,fair in 4 cases and poor in 1 case.The satisfactory rate was 91.9%.

Conclusion:The difference of the union time is obviously significant in the three kinds of nails for type A fracture.For the treatment of type B fracture,the union time of EMC nails differs from that of non-EMC nails and the union time of static nails does not differ from that of dynamic nails.The difference of the union time is obviously significant between EMC static nails and non-EMC dynamic nails in the treatment of type C fracture.Enlarging medullary cavity should be avoided during the operation and it will be better to choosing titanium alloy triangular locked nail without enlarging medullary cavity.
KEYWORDS:Fracture of tibia  Fracture fixation,internal  Locked intramedullary nail
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:罗国良,刘晓虹,罗昌军,黎友允,方磊.三种交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2004,17(7):411~413
英文格式:LUO Guo-Liang,LIU Xiao-hong,LUO Chang-jun,LI You-yun,FANG Lei.Comparison of therapeutic effect of tibial fracture with three different methods for locked intramedullary nail[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2004,17(7):411~413
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com