两种骨筋膜室减压方法治疗腘动脉延误伤的比较 |
Hits: 1861
Download times: 1269
Received:August 11, 2003
|
|
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2004年17卷,第3期,第169-170页 |
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz |
|
常规小腿骨筋膜室切开减压虽能达到减压目的,但并发症多,伤口愈合时间长。现就我院采用的小腿坏死肌肉彻底切除、Ⅰ期缝合皮肤的方法与常规切开方法对动脉延误伤的治疗效果和并发症进行回顾性比较。 |
[关键词]:减压术,外科 腘动脉 |
|
Comparison between two methods for decompression of osteofascial compartment in treating popliteal artery injury with delaying management |
KEYWORDS:Decompression,surgical Popliteal artery |
|
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献: |
中文格式: | 丁真奇,康两期,刘晖,翟文亮,洪加源.两种骨筋膜室减压方法治疗腘动脉延误伤的比较[J].中国骨伤,2004,17(3):169~170 |
英文格式: | DING Zhen qi,KANG Liang qi,LIU Hui,ZHAI Wen liang,HONG Jia yuan.Comparison between two methods for decompression of osteofascial compartment in treating popliteal artery injury with delaying management[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2004,17(3):169~170 |
|
View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
Close |
|
|
|