Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
手法与牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察
Hits: 2113   Download times: 1336   Received:August 09, 2002  Revised:November 25, 2002  
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
赵继荣 ZHAO Jirong 甘肃省中医院骨科,甘肃兰州730050 Department of Orthopaedics,Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Gansu Lanzhou 730050  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2003年16卷,第6期,第329-331页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz
基金项目:甘肃省科委科学事业费科研项目(QS002-C33-G34)


目的:观察脊柱定点旋转复位法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果。

方法:310例腰椎间盘突出症患者分为两组,治疗组250例采用脊柱定点旋转复位治疗,对照组60例采用机械床牵引治疗,观察治疗前后症状、体征、影像学变化。

结果:治疗后两组腰背部疼痛不适、下肢疼痛麻木、下肢功能、脊柱活动度与椎旁触压放射痛及直腿抬高和加强试验均有显著改善(P<0.01);手法改善疼痛、麻木症状优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗前后X线示椎间隙变化明显(P<0.01和P<0.05),组间比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。治疗前后CT示突出物位移均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。20例无效患者突出物与椎管面积比值超过40%。

结论:手法、牵引法均为保守治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效方法,改善疼痛麻木症状手法优于牵引法;突出物面积超过椎管面积40%时,不宜保守治疗。
[关键词]:椎间盘移位  正骨手法  牵引术  
 
Comparative analysis of curative effect of maneuver and mechanical traction for the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation
Abstract:

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of the spine fixed point of lumbar rotatory manipulation (LRM) on the treatment of the lumbar intervertebral disc herniation

Methods: 310 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were treated,in which 250 patients used the spine fixed point of LRM (as therapeutic groups) and the others with mechanical traction (as control group).The change of symptom,physical sign,X-ray and CT of the all patients were analyzed.

Results: The changes of the pain and upset of waist and back,lower limb ache and numb,lower limb function,spine activity,radiating pain of paravertebra pressed and leg elevation and strengthen test in the both of groups were significant better (P<0.01) after the treatment.Improvement of ache and numbness in therapeutic groups was better than in the control group (P<0.05). The changes of intervertebral space on X-ray and the migration of protrudent thing on CT were significant after treatment in both groups (P<0.01 ,P<0.05),but there were not difference between two groups (P>0.05).Ratio of the protrudent thing with the area of vertebral canal was more than 40% in 20 cases without effect.

Conclusion: Both of maneuver and mechanical traction are effective way for the lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.Maneuver is better than mechanical traction on improving pain and numb.Traditional therapy can not be used when the area of the protrudent thing is more than 40% of the vertebral canal.
KEYWORDS:Intervertebral disc displacement  Bone setting manipulation  Traction
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:赵继荣.手法与牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J].中国骨伤,2003,16(6):329~331
英文格式:ZHAO Jirong.Comparative analysis of curative effect of maneuver and mechanical traction for the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2003,16(6):329~331
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com