Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
复杂性腰椎管狭窄症手术方法比较
Hits: 2429   Download times: 1360   Received:July 24, 2001  Revised:November 20, 2001  
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
郭立新 GUO Li-xin 解放军第309医院, 北京 100091 The 309 th Hospital of PLA Beijing, 100091  
常青 CHANG Qing 解放军第309医院, 北京 100091 The 309 th Hospital of PLA Beijing, 100091  
马远征 MA Yuan-zheng 解放军第309医院, 北京 100091 The 309 th Hospital of PLA Beijing, 100091  
张国伟 霸州市开发区专科医院  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2002年15卷,第10期,第587-589页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:评估椎板切除后外侧融合术、椎板切除椎间融合经椎弓根内固定术治疗复杂性腰椎管狭窄患者的术后近、中期疗效。

方法:有21例患者接受椎板切除后外侧融合术,22例患者接受椎板切除椎间融合椎弓根内固定术,术后进行Oswestry疗效评定和腰椎影像学观察。

结果: 术后1年疗效优良率后外侧融合组为81.0%、椎间融合固定组为81.8%,术后1年两组疗效优良率无显著差别。术后4年疗效优良率后外侧融合组为72.2%、椎间融合组为78.9%;术后4后外侧融合组疗效下降显著,椎间融合组疗效下降不显著。

结论: 椎板切除椎间融合经椎弓根内固定术、椎板切除后外侧融合术治疗复杂性腰椎管狭窄症,术后近期疗效均满意。椎板切除后外侧融合组术后中期疗效下降,其腰椎不稳定和腰椎管再狭窄发生率较高。
[关键词]:椎管狭窄  脊柱融合术  外科手术
 
A comparative study of the surgical techniques used for the treatment of complex stenosis of lumbar spine
Abstract:

Objective:To evaluate the surgical techniques and outcomes for complex stenosis of lumbar spine

Methods:Laminectomy and posterolateral fusion were performed in 21 patients. Laminectomy and inter-body fusion with instrumentation were performed in 22 patients. The surgical outcomes were evaluated with Oswestry Disability Index and radiological findings from one to four years postoperatively.

Results:The satisfactory clinical results was achieved in 81.0% of the patients with posterolateral fusion and in 81.8% of the patients undergone interbody fusion one year after surgery. The rate of satisfactory clinical results dropped to 72. 2% in posterolateral fusion group,however it was maintained in 78.9% of the cases undergone interbody fusion groups four years after surgery.

Conclusion:The short-term outcomes of posterolateral fusion,interbody fusion with instrumentation for complex steneosis of lumbar spine were equally satisfactory in both groups. The medium-term surgical outcomes was maintained in patients treated by instrumented fusion,however it was deteriorated in patients with decompression fusion.
KEYWORDS:Spinal stenosis  Spinal fusion  Surgery,operative
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:郭立新,常青,马远征,张国伟.复杂性腰椎管狭窄症手术方法比较[J].中国骨伤,2002,15(10):587~589
英文格式:GUO Li-xin,CHANG Qing,MA Yuan-zheng.A comparative study of the surgical techniques used for the treatment of complex stenosis of lumbar spine[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2002,15(10):587~589
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com