Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
单纯性腰椎管狭窄症手术方法比较
Hits: 2086   Download times: 1167   Received:November 20, 2001    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
郭立新 GUO Li xin 解放军第309医院,北京100091 The 309th Hospital of PLA Beijing,100091  
黄迅悟 HUANG Xun wu 解放军第309医院,北京100091 The 309th Hospital of PLA Beijing,100091  
马远征 MA Yuan zheng 解放军第309医院,北京100091 The 309th Hospital of PLA Beijing,100091  
曾鸣 吉安市第二人民医院,江西吉安  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2002年15卷,第8期,第459-461页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:比较单纯性腰椎管狭窄症的手术方法,并介绍棘突截骨椎管成形术的临床应用。

方法:对48例单纯性腰椎管狭窄症患者分组进行椎板切除术、椎板开窗术和棘突截骨椎管成形术,术后进行Oswestry疗效评分和影像学观察。

结果:术后1年疗效优良率椎板切除组为819%、椎板开窗组为797%、椎管成形组为82.1%,疗效优良率各组无显著差别。术后4年疗效优良率椎板切除组为74.3%,椎板开窗组为782%,椎管成形组为80.4%。术后4年椎板切除组疗效下降显著,椎板开窗组和椎管成形组疗效下降不显著。术后1年所有患者X线检查未显示腰椎不稳定,术后4年X线显示有5名患者腰椎不稳定或退行性滑脱,其中椎板切除组3例、椎板开窗组和椎管成形组各1例。

结论:椎板切除术、椎板开窗术、椎管成形术治疗单纯性腰椎管狭窄,3组术后近期疗效均满意。术后中期评估表明椎管成形术和椎板开窗术优于椎板切除术,后者腰椎不稳定和交界处再狭窄发生率较高。
[关键词]:椎管狭窄  腰椎  外科手术
 
A comparative study of the surgical techniques for the treatment of simple lumbar spine stenosis
Abstract:

Objective:To compare surgical techniques for the treatment of simple lumbar stenosis and to describe a new procedure of canaloplasty

Methods:Laminectomy,laminotomy and canaloplasty were performed in 48 patients.The surgical outcomes were evaluated with Oswestry Disability Index and radiological findings from one to four years

Results:The satisfactory clinical results was achieved in 81.9% patients of undergone laminectomy group,79.7% of laminotomy group,and 82 1% of canaloplasty group were followed up one year after surgery.The satisfactory clinical result was dropped to 74.3% in laminectomy group,however the results were not changed in the laminotomy and canaloplasty groups four years after surgery.

Conclusion:Short term outcomes of laminectomy,laminotomy and canaloplasty for simple stenosis of lumbar spine were equally satisfactory.Medium term outcomes was better in canaloplasty and laminotomy group,and fair in laminectomy group with clinical and radiological following up.
KEYWORDS:Spinal canal stenosis  Lumbar vertebrae  Surgery,operative
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:郭立新,黄迅悟,马远征,曾鸣.单纯性腰椎管狭窄症手术方法比较[J].中国骨伤,2002,15(8):459~461
英文格式:GUO Li xin,HUANG Xun wu,MA Yuan zheng.A comparative study of the surgical techniques for the treatment of simple lumbar spine stenosis[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2002,15(8):459~461
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com