Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
双矩形髓内钉与加压钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的生物力学比较及疗效分析
Hits: 1827   Download times: 1214       
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
李康养 LI Kang yang 南山人民医院,广东深圳518052 Nanshan Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen,518025  
马楚平 MA Chu ping 南山人民医院,广东深圳518052 Nanshan Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen,518025  
林阳 LIN Yang 南山人民医院,广东深圳518052 Nanshan Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen,518025  
王利 南山人民医院,广东深圳518052 Nanshan Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen,518025  
马文松 南山人民医院,广东深圳518052 Nanshan Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen,518025  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2001年14卷,第1期,第22-24页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:通过双矩形髓内钉和加压钢板两种不同内固定物治疗肱骨干骨折的生物力学对比, 探讨有利于肱骨干骨折后的骨修复的内固定方法。

方法:以成人尸体湿骨制备骨折模型, 随机用双矩形髓内钉和加压钢板两种方法固定后进行四点弯曲试验、扭转试验和拉伸试验, 并结合临床疗效分析。

结果:测试数据经统计学检验, 矩形髓内钉组的四点弯曲试验和扭转试验均优于钢板组(P<0.01), 结果有显著差异, 而拉伸试验中矩形髓内钉和加压钢板组无显著差异(P>0.05).

结论:在肱骨干骨折的治疗中, 双矩形髓内钉固定较加压钢板内固定更适合骨折愈合所需的生物力学环境, 且临床效果较后者优。
[关键词]:骨折固定术,内  肱骨骨折  生物力学  
 
A comparative study of biomechanics and clinical results of double rectangle intramedullary nail and compressed plate for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture
Abstract:

Objective:To search for a better internal fixation method in the treatment of humeral shaft fracture by comparing biomechanics and clinical results of double rectangle intramedullary nail and compressed plate.

Methods:Fracture models were produced in 12 wet humeral bones specimens of adult cadavers.The models were randomly divided into two groups.Three bones of each group were fixed with double rectangle intramedullary and other three bones of each group were fixed with compressed plate.Three point bending test,twisting test and stretching test were done and analysed.

Results:The results of bending test and torsion test revealed that the double rectangle intramedullary nail was better than the compressed plate for the fixation of humeral shaft fracture.However,in strething test,the two fixation methods showed no significant difference.

Conclusion:The rectangle intramedullary nail is more suitable than compressed plate for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture.
KEYWORDS:Fracture fixation  internal Humeral fracture Biomechanics
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:李康养,马楚平,林阳,王利,马文松.双矩形髓内钉与加压钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的生物力学比较及疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2001,14(1):22~24
英文格式:LI Kang yang,MA Chu ping,LIN Yang.A comparative study of biomechanics and clinical results of double rectangle intramedullary nail and compressed plate for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2001,14(1):22~24
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com