Sponsor
  • ·
  • Chinese Association of
    Integrative Medicine;
    China Academy of Chinese
    Medicine Sciences
Editing
  • ·
  • Editorial Board of
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publishing
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Overseas Distributor
  • ·
  • China International Book
    Trading Corporation
    P.O.Box 399,Beijing,China
    Code No.M587
Mail-order
  • ·
  • Publishing House,
    China Journal of
    Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei,
    Beijing 100700,China
    Tel:0086-10-84020925
    Fax:0086-10-84036581
    Http://www.zggszz.com
    E-mail:zggszz@sina.com
股骨颈骨折三种内固定构型的稳定性比较研究
Hits: 2044   Download times: 1536   Received:January 10, 2000    
作者Author单位UnitE-Mail
余昱 YU Yu 中国中医研究院骨伤科研究所,北京100700 Institute of Orthopaedic and Traumatology,China Academe of Traditional Chinese Medicine Beijing,100700  
董福慧 DONG Fu hui 中国中医研究院骨伤科研究所,北京100700 Institute of Orthopaedic and Traumatology,China Academe of Traditional Chinese Medicine Beijing,100700  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2000年13卷,第6期,第331-333页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz


目的:通过力学疲劳实验对30个成人股骨标本进行股骨颈骨折三种内固定构型稳定性比较研究,为临床选择固定构型及能否术后立即承重提供依据。

方法:采用力学疲劳试验来模拟人体行走中的循环加载方式,对股骨颈骨折三针内固定构型进行稳定性的比较研究。

结果:股骨颈头下型骨折三针内固定组刚度明显大于头颈型骨折组(P<0.05);股骨颈头颈型骨折三种三针内固定构型有显着性差异(P<0.05).其中倒三角形固定构型组刚度明显大于直角三角形组;疲劳加载至3倍体重(2.1kN)时,93%骨-三针内固定构件被损坏;疲劳加载达5倍体重(3.5kN)时,所有构件都被损坏。

结论:对于无后侧皮质缺损的股骨颈头颈型骨折,在三种三针内固定构型中以倒三角形固定构型为佳。实验结果不支持股骨颈骨折多针内固定后早期负重行走。
[关键词]:骨折  股骨颈  骨折固定术    生物力学
 
A comparative study of the stability of three configurations of the three pin fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture.
Abstract:

Objective:Thirty human femur specimens were used as mechanical fatigue models to compare the stability of the three configurations for internal fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture,in order to provide a foundation for clincal choice and to delineate whether it is feasible to allow immediate full weight bearing following pins/screws fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Methods: Mechanical fatigue test was used to simulate the circulating loading mode during ambulation.The fixation stability of the three pin configurations was compared.

Results:The stiffness of three pin configurations in the group of subcapital femoral neck fracture (n=15) was much greater than that in the group of transcervcical femoral neck fracture (n=15) ( P<0.05);In the group of transceravical femoral neck fracture the fixation was stronger ( P<0.05)in the inverse triangle configuration compared with the right triangle type.93% of the bone fixation components were damaged when the fatiguing load was three times the normal weight(21 kN);none of the components were intact under the load of five times of the normal weight (35kN).

Conclusion: For the transcervical femoral neck fracture without posterior comminution,the inverse triangle configuration should be the best for clinical selection.Results of the biomechanical study did not support immediate early ambulation with full weight bearing.
KEYWORDS:Fracture femoral neck  Fracture fixation internal  Biomechanics
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:余昱,董福慧.股骨颈骨折三种内固定构型的稳定性比较研究[J].中国骨伤,2000,13(6):331~333
英文格式:YU Yu,DONG Fu hui.A comparative study of the stability of three configurations of the three pin fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture.[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2000,13(6):331~333
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close




版权所有:Editorial Office of China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology京ICP备12048066号  版权声明
地址:No.16A, Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei, Beijing 100700, China
电话:0086-10-84036581 传真:0086-10-84036581 Email:zggszz@sina.com