胫骨开放骨折不扩髓交锁髓内钉与外固定支架治疗比较 |
Hits: 2056
Download times: 1342
Received:December 02, 1998 Revised:April 13, 1999
|
|
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2000年13卷,第1期,第14-15页 |
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz |
|
目的:对比外固定支架与不扩髓交锁髓内钉对胫骨Ⅲ型B开放骨折的治疗结果。
方法:33例胫骨Ⅲ型B开放骨折的患者,随机分为两个治疗组,17例采用外固定支架,16例采用髓内钉固定,进行疗效对比分析。
结果:髓内钉组的感染率、不良愈合率、不愈合率及愈合时间均低于支架组,且前者更容易护理,二期创面处理更方便。
结论:我们认为不扩髓交锁髓内钉较之外固定支架更适用于Ⅲ型B胫骨开放骨折。 |
[关键词]:胫骨开放骨折 外固定支架 髓内钉 |
|
Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures:Comparison of Non reamed Interlocking Intramedullary Nail and External Fixator |
|
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the treatment results of non reamed interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixator in Grade Ⅲ B open tibial fractures.
Methods:Of 33 cases,17 were treated with external fixator;16 were treated with non reamed interlocking intramedullary nails.
Results:The nailed group have advantage over the external fixed group as follows:lower rate of infection,delayed union and nonunion;short time of healing;easier care;easier management of the wound.
Conclusion:Compared with external fixation,non reamed interlocking intramedullary nail is more suitable for the treatment of Grade Ⅲ B open tibial fracture. |
KEYWORDS:Open tibial fracture External fixator Intramedullary nail |
|
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献: |
中文格式: | 江敞,唐明杰,施忠民.胫骨开放骨折不扩髓交锁髓内钉与外固定支架治疗比较[J].中国骨伤,2000,13(1):14~15 |
英文格式: | JIANG Chang,TANG Ming jie,SHI Zhong min.Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures:Comparison of Non reamed Interlocking Intramedullary Nail and External Fixator[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2000,13(1):14~15 |
|
View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
Close |